Dynamix wrote:I never spit on Trez, actually gave him props, for a time he was the player I enjoyed watching the most. He definitely wasn't to blame for the bubble, Doc was the one that played him too much, just like he enabled all his bad habbits that eventually caught up with him.
Only brought that up because sometimes even casual fans have the right to be obsessed about certain players getting too many minutes. Just like with Avery Bradley, before the FO mercifully stepped in. I'm guessing they tried the same with Mook, but couldn't find any takers.
It's not even a Mann vs. Mook issue, they're playing different positions. Mann could easily take some minutes away from Russ, especially in the 4th, and there should have been an actual competition between Mook and RoCo throughout the season, not just have one of them as a locked starter, while the other one is only thrown out there when we're desperate.
Yes, the casual fans will rely on the eye test more than whatever metric fits the narrative best at a certain moment. No, Mann isn't a perfect player and has had his fair share of struggles, especially when being bounced around between different lineups. Not everyone has the privilege to share most of their minutes with Kawhi and PG.
All I know is that Mann more often than not brings a ton of energy, just like last night, before that shady ref went on a power trip. His absence was definitely missed for the rest of the game. Meanwhile, Mook getting tossed against Golden State (or when he was out for a bunch of games we happened to win) didn't exactly hurt our chances.
I'm not going to sit through every single posession to try and make sense of exactly who Mann/Mook play with or against. Like I said, different positions and lineups. You're the one that keeps bringing up +/- (other than as a joke, the way everyone else does) like it's some Holy Grail that trumps everything. Not saying it's not a meaningful stat, just that you could put me out there next to Kawhi, I'll take a couple seconds to tie my shoes, he gets a steal and a dunk, and we both get +2. That's it.
And for the record, I do think Mook is actually trying his best out there, sometimes even looks decent, and him being out of the rotation wouldn't magically turn us into a contender. It's just that his tank seems running on empty, and it might be too late before Ty finally accepts it.
But hey, looking forward to being proven wrong on this matter. We could definitely use every single player overachieving right about now.
Not a Holy Grail but a stat that tells us what's working and what's not working more than any other stat. And in the other thread, I said the same thing, that playing with PG or KL is gonna lift your plus/minus. Also noted is that for his $16M salary, Morris is a gross disappointment. Ty is just trying to mine him for useful minutes that don't kill us out there.
And by all indications, if KL and PG wanted Mann or RoCo out there as starters with them, they would be. If they wanted Mook buried, he would be.
And BTW, Batum is slumping lately, also as maxed out as Mook is. I remember Barkley saying that when you get older, you can still have a good game but it can take you a week to recover. Batum has been struggling since he played 37 minutes EIGHT GAMES AGO, shooting 33%/32% and near the bottom in plus/minus.
https://www.nba.com/stats/players/traditional?LastNGames=7&TeamID=1610612746&dir=A&sort=PLUS_MINUSBut hey, looking forward to being proven wrong on this matter. We could definitely use every single player overachieving right about now.
You're not wrong, it's just that the alternatives to Mook suck worse. Covington went 1-8 last night in only 7 minutes. Where every minute of every game counts now for playoff seeding, Ty can't afford the luxury.
Yes, I'm actually pumping T-Mann. He turns 27 in October. He's not a kid anymore and he starts making $10M+ next year. His time is now.