esqtvd wrote:Sal Cap expert Eric Pincus on the radio today--said Lakers best bet if CP is bought out--Lakers the better match for basketball reasons and maybe political too if he plays for the minimum.
But the Lakers have nothing to trade and as a family business, not a huge inclination to be a repeat lux taxpayer at CP's salary.
And CP is not averse to getting PAID. The Clippers have Ballmer Bucks and plenty of expiring contracts and pretty much what I wrote above, something like Boston or the #30 to sweeten the pot. And VERY motivated to dump Marcus's contract and I think DGAF if Gordon or RoCo stays or goes. [We're so far over the cap it doesn't make any difference, and neither is a needle-mover on the court.]
I don't think we need to throw *anything* into a trade. Washington just picked up a boatload of second rounders that they're unlikely to use except as trade capital ... like here. This is where expiring contracts like Mook and RoCo are nice. CP3 is more valuable than those two combined--but that ultimately doesn't help the Wiz, who are going to spend 2-3 years (minimum) rebuilding. The big deal is that CP3 has 2 years left on his deal. If he gets bought out ($15.8 million), the Wiz spend $16 million and count it against the cap for--nothing. If he's traded for Coffey, RoCo and Mook, they spend $14 million for three NBA quality players. If RoCo and Mook get some minutes, they have value as mid-season trade targets for playoff teams wanting bench strength or teams looking for expiring deals. Far as I can see, the Wiz are the ones who should sweeten the deal just a bit. They got 6 second round picks from the Suns. We'll take two, thanks.
About CP3 and Westbrook together ... like I said, I think it could work. We have to ask them. And this is where I give priority to the lesser player. Westbrook came here, fit in, played hard, helped us in the playoffs. (Last time he did that--Washington! The irony is not lost on me.) He should be asked first.