ImageImageImageImageImage

Jazz / Clippers

Moderators: og15, TrueLAfan

sendai91
Rookie
Posts: 1,247
And1: 14
Joined: Apr 02, 2006

Jazz / Clippers 

Post#1 » by sendai91 » Mon May 19, 2008 3:51 pm

How reasonable is an offer that centers around Okur, Ronnie Brewer and either Morris Almond or the Jazz 2008 #1 pick and the 2010 NY unprotected #1 pick for Kaman and Brevin Knight? Or, Okur, Harpring, Brewer and either Almond or 2008 #1 and the NY 2010 for Kaman and Mobley?
loflin3hree5ive
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 7,342
And1: 67
Joined: Aug 27, 2003
Location: Clipperland

 

Post#2 » by loflin3hree5ive » Mon May 19, 2008 5:23 pm

Pretty reasonable. I don't see the Clippers trading Kaman, but it's a respectable offer.
User avatar
JJ LoDuca
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,834
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 18, 2007
Location: SoCal

 

Post#3 » by JJ LoDuca » Mon May 19, 2008 5:44 pm

It's not laughable, but the Clippers wouldn't give up Kaman for that. Since good centers are hard to come by in this day, I think Kaman may be the only untradable player on the team. Yup, I said it...even before EB (just because his contract is expiring). I think Kaman is too valuable for the Clippers to give him up, unless we are "overpaid" in a trade for him.
-Ms. JJ
User avatar
ClipperEric
Rookie
Posts: 1,065
And1: 5
Joined: Jan 03, 2008
Location: Long Beach

 

Post#4 » by ClipperEric » Mon May 19, 2008 6:24 pm

I agree with all of the above.

Okur's not bad but he's not a real center. Maybe you should look for a big bruiser/rebounder type, you don't need a scorer.
mkwest
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,910
And1: 5,728
Joined: Dec 18, 2005
   

 

Post#5 » by mkwest » Tue May 20, 2008 7:23 am

I like what Okur brings to the table. I also think that Utah is giving up quite a bit which could sway the overall value in our favor depending on how those picks play out (primarily the Knicks). At the same time, as long as Kaman stays focused he will be a top 5ish center in the league at a reasonable salary. I'm in agreement with everyone else here and would have to decline the offer.
jgustav1
Analyst
Posts: 3,367
And1: 21
Joined: Jul 29, 2003

Re: Jazz / Clippers 

Post#6 » by jgustav1 » Wed May 21, 2008 4:07 am

sendai91 wrote:How reasonable is an offer that centers around Okur, Ronnie Brewer and either Morris Almond or the Jazz 2008 #1 pick and the 2010 NY unprotected #1 pick for Kaman and Brevin Knight? Or, Okur, Harpring, Brewer and either Almond or 2008 #1 and the NY 2010 for Kaman and Mobley?


I'd probably take either trade you've proposed although I like the second one better. The Clippers could end up trading Mehmut Okur to Chicago for Kirk Hinrich and possibly move Maggette and Morris Almond to Portland for Joel Pyrzbilla and Martell Webster. The 7th pick could be used for either a C such as Brook Lopez (doubtful he would be there) or DeAndre Jordan. The NY 2010 pick is what sways this one in the Clippers favor.
User avatar
mj_shoefanatic
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,113
And1: 104
Joined: Dec 23, 2007
Location: Lob Angeles
       

 

Post#7 » by mj_shoefanatic » Wed May 21, 2008 8:28 pm

Respectable offer but IMHO not worth it in the long run.

Kaman>Okur

CAT>Brewer/Harpring

Knight>Almond
Tucker74
Senior
Posts: 617
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 20, 2001
Location: With every positive move inching closer to Sec 215...

 

Post#8 » by Tucker74 » Wed May 21, 2008 11:44 pm

I would take either deal in a heartbeat simply to get out of Kaman's contract. Okur has only 1 year + PO compared to Kaman's which runs for the next billion years. And after watching the Jazz in the playoffs, Harpring/Brewer is definitely an upgrade over Cat at relatively the same money.

Not sure why Utah would touch this deal as it adds to their long-term payroll, doesn't solve their need for a slasher (Corey!) and replaces one of their best perimeter shooters/mismatches with a traditional center that will clog the lane for Boozer.
Hype97
Freshman
Posts: 67
And1: 10
Joined: Jul 06, 2006

 

Post#9 » by Hype97 » Thu May 22, 2008 2:05 am

Tucker74 wrote:I would take either deal in a heartbeat simply to get out of Kaman's contract. Okur has only 1 year + PO compared to Kaman's which runs for the next billion years. And after watching the Jazz in the playoffs, Harpring/Brewer is definitely an upgrade over Cat at relatively the same money.

Not sure why Utah would touch this deal as it adds to their long-term payroll, doesn't solve their need for a slasher (Corey!) and replaces one of their best perimeter shooters/mismatches with a traditional center that will clog the lane for Boozer.


Youre crazy.


And on the topic, if we picked up Okur (let alone at the expense of Kaman) Id have to question my fanhood.
jgustav1
Analyst
Posts: 3,367
And1: 21
Joined: Jul 29, 2003

 

Post#10 » by jgustav1 » Thu May 22, 2008 4:20 am

Tucker74 wrote:I would take either deal in a heartbeat simply to get out of Kaman's contract. Okur has only 1 year + PO compared to Kaman's which runs for the next billion years. And after watching the Jazz in the playoffs, Harpring/Brewer is definitely an upgrade over Cat at relatively the same money.

Not sure why Utah would touch this deal as it adds to their long-term payroll, doesn't solve their need for a slasher (Corey!) and replaces one of their best perimeter shooters/mismatches with a traditional center that will clog the lane for Boozer.


It is good to see another rational viewpoint on this thread. Too many people have forgotten we only one 23 games this season, Kaman had career high statistics with Brand out but it doesn't matter if you consistently lose games. Kaman isn't worth Okur, 2 or 3 rotation players and a Knicks future #1 pick.
User avatar
SportsFan215
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,992
And1: 60
Joined: Jun 23, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

 

Post#11 » by SportsFan215 » Fri May 23, 2008 9:06 pm

mj_shoefanatic wrote:Respectable offer but IMHO not worth it in the long run.

Kaman>Okur

CAT>Brewer/Harpring

Knight>Almond


How can you say Cat Mobley is better than Ronnie Brewer and Matt Harpring? Brewer is young and plays great defense. Harpring is a very good role player.
User avatar
ClipperEric
Rookie
Posts: 1,065
And1: 5
Joined: Jan 03, 2008
Location: Long Beach

 

Post#12 » by ClipperEric » Fri May 23, 2008 9:18 pm

SportsFan215 wrote:How can you say Cat Mobley is better than Ronnie Brewer and Matt Harpring? Brewer is young and plays great defense. Harpring is a very good role player.


I know Brewer is known for his Defense, and in college he certainly looked the part. But did you see the way Kobe manhandled him? He got worked all over the floor, there was nothing Brewer could do to stop him.

That being said, Mobley is not better than both of those guys combined.
User avatar
mj_shoefanatic
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,113
And1: 104
Joined: Dec 23, 2007
Location: Lob Angeles
       

 

Post#13 » by mj_shoefanatic » Fri May 23, 2008 11:41 pm

SportsFan215 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



How can you say Cat Mobley is better than Ronnie Brewer and Matt Harpring? Brewer is young and plays great defense. Harpring is a very good role player.


Neither one of those guys can knock down a consistent jumper or score 20+ in a game and their D is mediocre. Just ask Kobe! :roll:
User avatar
ClipperDomination
Veteran
Posts: 2,804
And1: 2
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Los Angeles

 

Post#14 » by ClipperDomination » Sat May 24, 2008 12:16 am

Yeah, I'd take both Brewer and Harpring over Cat.
User avatar
SportsFan215
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,992
And1: 60
Joined: Jun 23, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

 

Post#15 » by SportsFan215 » Tue May 27, 2008 11:39 pm

ClipperEric wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I know Brewer is known for his Defense, and in college he certainly looked the part. But did you see the way Kobe manhandled him? He got worked all over the floor, there was nothing Brewer could do to stop him.

That being said, Mobley is not better than both of those guys combined.


Kobe can manhandle just about anybody in the NBA.
yougottoloveitbaby
Sophomore
Posts: 193
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

 

Post#16 » by yougottoloveitbaby » Wed May 28, 2008 2:09 am

Ok, you guys come up with a fair trade
I'd give anybody but D-Will. Boozer and filler
sounds fair to me but you guys have Brand so
maybe a three way with Chicago?
I WANT KAMAN!
User avatar
ClipperDomination
Veteran
Posts: 2,804
And1: 2
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Los Angeles

 

Post#17 » by ClipperDomination » Wed May 28, 2008 3:14 am

Kaman isn't going anywhere for some time.
Tucker74
Senior
Posts: 617
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 20, 2001
Location: With every positive move inching closer to Sec 215...

 

Post#18 » by Tucker74 » Sat May 31, 2008 3:13 pm

yougottoloveitbaby wrote:I WANT KAMAN!

You can have him and his bloated contract. Where do we sign?!

Return to Los Angeles Clippers