With reigning NBA Most Valuable Player Derrick Rose missing nearly half the season with physical ailments, Miami’s LeBron James has become a heavy favorite to regain possession of the trophy he won in 2008 and 2009.
If he wins, as I suspect he will, James will be just the eighth player in league history to take home the league’s most prestigious award a third time. This would place him with such luminaries as Michael Jordan, Magic Johnson, Larry Bird, Wilt Chamberlain, Bill Russell, Kareem Abdul-Jabbar and Moses Malone.
Not that it should influence voters, but he also would be the lone member of such select company without a championship ring.
Until recently, Oklahoma City’s Kevin Durant had authored a compelling case as an alternative for the No. 1 spot on the official MVP ballot that requires voters to rank five players. The league’s No. 2 scorer, Durant had his team with a comfortable lead atop the Western Conference from the first week of the season.
Team success counts for plenty in MVP consideration.
But something went awry in Oklahoma City of late — and it wasn’t injuries. The Thunder lost its winning magic and its lead in the West. With that, Durant may have lost any chance of edging James for the award.
Doesn’t that make James a slam-dunk choice for the top spot on every ballot?
Call me a contrarian, but neither James nor Durant will be on the No. 1 spot when I e-vote on Friday. This has everything to do with how I define value and places less weight on statistical analysis.
If you believe a player’s true value is defined by his ability to optimize the talents of each of his teammates, I contend no player is more worthy than Clippers point guard Chris Paul.
http://blog.mysanantonio.com/spursnatio ... clear-mvp/