ImageImageImageImageImage

Game 55: Los Angeles Clippers (37-17) @ Boston Celtics (37-16) - 8:00 PM ET

Moderators: og15, TrueLAfan

User avatar
esqtvd
RealGM
Posts: 12,090
And1: 4,829
Joined: Jun 24, 2017
Location: LA LA LA LAND
Contact:
     

Re: Game 55: Los Angeles Clippers (37-17) @ Boston Celtics (37-16) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#121 » by esqtvd » Sat Feb 15, 2020 8:36 pm

og15 wrote:
esqtvd wrote:
og15 wrote:
Spoiler:

Interesting points about the Lou/Shamet/Harrell combination and defense. Making up for three players on defense is too much though. Ideally you only want to be making up for one guy, and at most two. If there are more players on the floor to make up for than there are guys anchoring the defense, then it's very unlikely those lineups will consistently perform well on defense.

Or if you do have to make up for more than two guys on defense, one of those guys probably shouldn't be your big.

All that said, I don't ever feel it is fair to evaluate with perception and no data. I've been eyeing Harrell's on/off Drtg all season to see how the team performs on defense with him on the court (while of course understanding that he's not the only factor).

As of this moment:
Harrell on: 108.2 Drtg
Harrell off: 107.2 Drtg

Defense is a little bit better when he's off, but not significant, and who else he's playing with factors in.

What was evident before and is no longer evident is the offensive boost with him vs without.

At this moment:
Harrell on: 113.5 Ortg
Harrell off: 113.0 Ortg

This means that as of now, Harrell net on/off is -0.5, this does not mean he is bad or negative or anything like that. What it does mean is that the team so far is performing just as well (0.5 is such a small difference) with him on the court than without.

Zubac is obviously the big question when it comes to who should be playing instead.

Zubac on: 107.1 Drtg
Zubac off: 108.2 Drtg

Zubac on: 113.4 Ortg
Zubac off: 113.2 Drtg

His NetRtg is, +1.3. Small differences, there's some noise there, but at the least we can theorize that it's pretty much a wash as to which on is on the court at this moment. This gives great support to those who are calling for a greater use of Zubac, especially in moments where Harrell is playing long extended minutes and maybe starts to look winded or unable to give second and third efforts.

There's nothing in his play or the numbers suggesting that the team would start bleeding points if Zubac played more and more consistently, especially to give Harrell a breather. Now of course on/off data is just one piece, it's not taking into account teammates. Zubac plays more (most) of his minutes with better defenders than Harrell does, but then Harrell plays more minutes against bench lineups than Zubac does and those lineups are more often inferior on offense though maybe not on defense to their starter counterparts.



Good analysis, rather than opinions and rancid emotions, LOL. But put Zubac out there with the second team instead of the first and you'll see everything including his numbers go to hell.

His numbers are good with the first team because most of those minutes are with Kawhi, who makes everybody look good. And as you saw in a typical case like in Boston when he's having a bad game, we started getting killed at the beginning of the 3rd quarter and Doc gave him the hook. This not only preserved Zu's stats [although he was still a team-worst minus-13 for the game] but also it stopped the bleeding on the court.

Trezz was the only reason we were still in that game, that and Lou's 35 points. And yet this game thread turns into bashing them. Unreal. :roll:

That’s of course the second question, and maybe a harder one to figure out, or maybe not. One way we can attempt to hypothesize is look at two and three man lineups such as Kawhi/Zubac vs Kawhi/Harrell and Lou/Zubac vs Lou/Harrell and Kawhi/George/Zubac vs Kawhi/George/Harrell and try and get a feel for what’s happening there. Of course sample sizes might not be sufficient to make conclusions. Here’s some of that.

With Leonard:
Zubac: 698 mins, 112.5 Ortg, 105.3 Drtg, +7.2 NetRtg
Harrell: 635 mins, 116.8 Ortg, 100.4 Drtg, +16.5 NetRtg

With Williams:
Zubac: 299 mins, 103.1 Ortg, 107.2 Drtg, -4.2 NetRtg
Harrell: 1222 mins, 110.9 Ortg, 106.5 Drtg, +4.4 NetRtg

With Leonard and George:
Zubac: 355 mins, 114.7 Ortg, 104.9 Drtg, +9.8 NetRtg
Harrell: 199 mins, 109.7 Ortg, 97.4 Drtg, +12.3 NetRtg

So the first thing to notice is that when they are on the floor with Kawhi, a combination that has good and similar sample sizes for both, the units with Harrell is really moping the floor with the units that have Zubac. This is certainly a good argument for the coaching staffs use of Harrell. That unit is also 5 points/100 better on defense.

Second is that when you isolate each with Williams, we see that Harrell is actually still winning on both ends, but also that Zubac does not provide enough offensive help and there’s a drastic drop off offensively. Overall there’s a 8.2 point/100 difference in team production, and again, defensively, you’re still getting a better result with Harrell. Large discrepancy in sample size here though.

Now we look at with both George and Leonard, and we see something different offensively, we get a drop there, and maybe surprising to some, but defensively again, the lineups with Harrell win by a large margin, this time 7.5 pts/100 better on defense, and still having a better NetRtg despite being inferior on offense.

That’s a lot of data pointing in one direction and should certainly be analyzed and taken into account.

The Bench Lineups
In terms of the bench struggling defensively, SlayrofDynasties mentioning of the 3 man combination of Williams/Shamet/Harrell is telling, and obviously it makes sense. Two smaller guards like that can be trouble on defense depending on who the players are. With Williams, Shamet will get forced to guard less favourable matchups for him, reducing his defensive effectiveness, and Williams is just not a good defender either way.

Williams/Harrell/Shamet: 460 mins, 110.0 Ortg, 110.9 Drtg, -1.0 NetRtg

BUT, If we add Leonard to the Williams/Shamet combo:
Williams/Leonard/Shamet: 249 mins, 112.9 Ortg, 107.5 Drtg, +5.3 NetRtg

So Kawhi is able to balance out that combination when he plays with them.

Okay, what about having Leonard on with Williams and Harrell?
Leonard/Williams/Harrell: 464 mins, 114.8 Ortg, 98.8 Drtg, +16.0 NetRtg

The lineups with Leonard/Williams/Harrell is actually one of the strongest 3 man combinations on the team. So Kawhi has been a balancing force for the Williams/Harrell combo in a whole season sense, they are elite both on offense and defense for their 464 minutes. If we look at 3 man lineups with 150+ mins, out of the top 15 in Drtg, Harrell is part of 7 of them. In the top 20, he’s part of 10 of the 20. Zubac on the other hand is part of just 1 of the top 15, and that is 12th, and just two in the top 20. Harrell is part of the best 3 man unit with 150+ minutes, Beverley/Leonard/Harrell (246 mins, 122.5 Ortg, 91.1 Drtg, +31.4 NetRtg).


Since January
Piggy backing off the other thread about Williams and Harrell in the New Year, since January:

With Leonard:
Zubac: 293 mins, 115.9 Ortg, 110.5 Drtg, +5.5 NetRtg
Harrell: 225 mins, 120.5 Ortg, 108.8 Drtg, +11.8 NetRtg

With Williams:
Zubac: 121 mins, 103.0 Ortg, 109.3 Drtg, -6.3 NetRtg
Harrell: 456 mins, 110.2 Ortg, 111.7 Drtg, -1.5 NetRtg

With George and Leonard:
Zubac: 83 mins, 114.0 Ortg, 110.7 Drtg, +3.3 NetRtg
Harrell: 32 mins, 113.6 Ortg, 102.9 Drtg, +10.7 NetRtg

Williams/Leonard/Harrell: 171 mins, 118.4 Ortg, 107.6 Drtg, +10.8 NetRtg

I’ll have to say that I did not necessarily expect the numbers to look like this, but if we’re using lineup data and normalizing to an extent for who is on the court with the bigs (Zubac vs Harrell), lineups with Harrell are winning by a landslide when it comes to defense and overall net per possession production. This is both for the season as a whole and since the start of the new year.

So even in that sample size since January, you’re still getting a better result both offensive and defensively when you pair Kawhi and Harrell vs pairing Kawhi and Zubac. Playing either with Williams suggest that you are still getting a better overall result with Harrell, and then combined with the w/Leonard and w/George+Leonard data suggests that Harrell on his own is not giving an inferior defensive result to Zubac, but it is the pieces around them making the difference. The data is actually leaning towards Harrell giving a superior defensive contribution altogether, though it is not comprehensive and complete data to make a definitive statement like that. We also see that the Williams/Leonard/Harrell lineup even in January has been performing very well.




Great work, G, and it seems to have hushed up Planet Zubac. For how long, I don't know, LOL.

Facts are stubborn things. My first assumption is always that Doc Rivers knows more about basketball than I do, so I look for stats that explain his reasoning. The stats uncannily always seem to back Doc up when you dig below the surface.

He looks at the stats too, you know. First and foremost, he wants to win. The personal attacks are silly.

I was confident that Trezz would come through clean but even I am surprised that Lou--who is provably a minus defender and lately has been less than his best offensively--would still come out so positively. But you just proved that any apparent suckage can be attributed the crud they've been obliged to be out on the floor with--McGruder, Green, Robinson, and assorted G Leaguers. We should be toasting Trezz and Lou, not trashing them. We'd be dead meat without them.
Image Are We Having Fun Yet?
User avatar
esqtvd
RealGM
Posts: 12,090
And1: 4,829
Joined: Jun 24, 2017
Location: LA LA LA LAND
Contact:
     

Re: Game 55: Los Angeles Clippers (37-17) @ Boston Celtics (37-16) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#122 » by esqtvd » Sat Feb 15, 2020 8:41 pm

50CalClips wrote:
esqtvd wrote:
50CalClips wrote:We're f&cken Coachless.

driveby scapegoating is bogus, bro

please do tell us what you would have done instead

coaching is the only reason we were ever in this game starting with pulling Zubac for Trezz [minus-13] after we fell behind by 10 within 3 minutes of the 3rd quarter

Trezz played 44 minutes and finished plus+4 with 24 points and 13 rebounds

what magic trick would you have pulled out of your hat?

tell us, Mr. Wizard
:wizard:

the floor's all yours

me, I think this was one of our best games of the year and I'm not gonna douchebag anybody about it


Just an honest assessment.



Not questioning your honesty, only your accuracy. I hope maybe OG has given you a fresh look at the situation.
Image Are We Having Fun Yet?
User avatar
50CalClips
Rookie
Posts: 1,066
And1: 324
Joined: Jul 25, 2019
   

Re: Game 55: Los Angeles Clippers (37-17) @ Boston Celtics (37-16) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#123 » by 50CalClips » Sat Feb 15, 2020 8:42 pm

og15 wrote:
50CalClips wrote:Glen plays "accidental Basketball"

At 28:50...


I looked at 28:50 and I don't think that's what you meant to cite, lol

What, did you listened to 3 seconds of it? They're finishing up talking about the significance of the number "24" just before.

That's when they when they start talking about style of play, game-planning, running plays, structure(and freedom), counters (aka, "options"), well-coached, well-informed, well-discipline, team basketball, etc... a GREAT chuck of the podcast... 28:50 is right around they start the topic. They finish up/change topics again at around 31:00.

    The Great Kobe Bryant - "That helped me game-plan. These players now play accidental basketball. It drives me and Phil crazy, cuz it's all penetrate and pitch... it's accidental basketball, we played basketball with purpose" He then gives a specific example.

Glen runs a loose Clippers ship.


(P.S. - I'm not suggesting that Kobe said it specifically about Glen, to be clear. It's that the idea of "accidental basketball" juxtaposed to disciplined, structured, informed basketball)
User avatar
50CalClips
Rookie
Posts: 1,066
And1: 324
Joined: Jul 25, 2019
   

Re: Game 55: Los Angeles Clippers (37-17) @ Boston Celtics (37-16) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#124 » by 50CalClips » Sat Feb 15, 2020 9:03 pm

esqtvd wrote:
50CalClips wrote:
esqtvd wrote:driveby scapegoating is bogus, bro

please do tell us what you would have done instead

coaching is the only reason we were ever in this game starting with pulling Zubac for Trezz [minus-13] after we fell behind by 10 within 3 minutes of the 3rd quarter

Trezz played 44 minutes and finished plus+4 with 24 points and 13 rebounds

what magic trick would you have pulled out of your hat?

tell us, Mr. Wizard
:wizard:

the floor's all yours

me, I think this was one of our best games of the year and I'm not gonna douchebag anybody about it


Just an honest assessment.


Not questioning your honesty, only your accuracy. I hope maybe OG has given you a fresh look at the situation.


og15? What... player ratings and lineups?

Coaching is the underlying problem. Preparation, structure, informed-team ball (lack-there-of)... that's the GLARING issue, and there's been no improvement. That has to fall on Coaching. No way around it.

I like Glen, I'd like for him (and the staff) to do well, I don't take pleasure in pointing out his(/their) shortcoming... but to me it's self-evident at this point.
User avatar
esqtvd
RealGM
Posts: 12,090
And1: 4,829
Joined: Jun 24, 2017
Location: LA LA LA LAND
Contact:
     

Re: Game 55: Los Angeles Clippers (37-17) @ Boston Celtics (37-16) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#125 » by esqtvd » Sat Feb 15, 2020 9:08 pm

well, as they say, you can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into
Image Are We Having Fun Yet?
User avatar
50CalClips
Rookie
Posts: 1,066
And1: 324
Joined: Jul 25, 2019
   

Re: Game 55: Los Angeles Clippers (37-17) @ Boston Celtics (37-16) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#126 » by 50CalClips » Sat Feb 15, 2020 9:22 pm

esqtvd wrote:well, as they say, you can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into


You don't see it.

Spoiler:
It's called a mental scotoma
User avatar
50CalClips
Rookie
Posts: 1,066
And1: 324
Joined: Jul 25, 2019
   

Re: Game 55: Los Angeles Clippers (37-17) @ Boston Celtics (37-16) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#127 » by 50CalClips » Sat Feb 15, 2020 9:31 pm

Yogatti wrote:doc rivers is basically a glorified tyronn lue. He's the "mark jackson" and Jerry West needs to find the "steve kerr" to elevate this team to another level.

I'm honestly fine if Clippers get bounced in the 1st round because that's the only way the FO can be convinced to get rid of doc rivers


Chris Paul covered the warts for some time :-?

I still think the players could overcome things and Contend for the Title, regardless. Kawhi has to be more demanding, George has to exert his defensive will (more), Lou has to check himself and be more selective with his shots... Morris, 3 and D and back Kawhi, idk.
User avatar
esqtvd
RealGM
Posts: 12,090
And1: 4,829
Joined: Jun 24, 2017
Location: LA LA LA LAND
Contact:
     

Re: Game 55: Los Angeles Clippers (37-17) @ Boston Celtics (37-16) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#128 » by esqtvd » Sat Feb 15, 2020 9:49 pm

50CalClips wrote:
esqtvd wrote:well, as they say, you can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into


You don't see it.

It's called a mental scotoma



:dontknow: I see OG spending an hour rounding up the facts and you sitting on your couch d-bagging Doc

rock on
Image Are We Having Fun Yet?
Captain Ballmer
Rookie
Posts: 1,205
And1: 982
Joined: Jul 14, 2015
Location: Istanbul
   

Re: Game 55: Los Angeles Clippers (37-17) @ Boston Celtics (37-16) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#129 » by Captain Ballmer » Sun Feb 16, 2020 10:50 am

og15 wrote:
esqtvd wrote:
og15 wrote:
Spoiler:

Interesting points about the Lou/Shamet/Harrell combination and defense. Making up for three players on defense is too much though. Ideally you only want to be making up for one guy, and at most two. If there are more players on the floor to make up for than there are guys anchoring the defense, then it's very unlikely those lineups will consistently perform well on defense.

Or if you do have to make up for more than two guys on defense, one of those guys probably shouldn't be your big.

All that said, I don't ever feel it is fair to evaluate with perception and no data. I've been eyeing Harrell's on/off Drtg all season to see how the team performs on defense with him on the court (while of course understanding that he's not the only factor).

As of this moment:
Harrell on: 108.2 Drtg
Harrell off: 107.2 Drtg

Defense is a little bit better when he's off, but not significant, and who else he's playing with factors in.

What was evident before and is no longer evident is the offensive boost with him vs without.

At this moment:
Harrell on: 113.5 Ortg
Harrell off: 113.0 Ortg

This means that as of now, Harrell net on/off is -0.5, this does not mean he is bad or negative or anything like that. What it does mean is that the team so far is performing just as well (0.5 is such a small difference) with him on the court than without.

Zubac is obviously the big question when it comes to who should be playing instead.

Zubac on: 107.1 Drtg
Zubac off: 108.2 Drtg

Zubac on: 113.4 Ortg
Zubac off: 113.2 Drtg

His NetRtg is, +1.3. Small differences, there's some noise there, but at the least we can theorize that it's pretty much a wash as to which on is on the court at this moment. This gives great support to those who are calling for a greater use of Zubac, especially in moments where Harrell is playing long extended minutes and maybe starts to look winded or unable to give second and third efforts.

There's nothing in his play or the numbers suggesting that the team would start bleeding points if Zubac played more and more consistently, especially to give Harrell a breather. Now of course on/off data is just one piece, it's not taking into account teammates. Zubac plays more (most) of his minutes with better defenders than Harrell does, but then Harrell plays more minutes against bench lineups than Zubac does and those lineups are more often inferior on offense though maybe not on defense to their starter counterparts.



Good analysis, rather than opinions and rancid emotions, LOL. But put Zubac out there with the second team instead of the first and you'll see everything including his numbers go to hell.

His numbers are good with the first team because most of those minutes are with Kawhi, who makes everybody look good. And as you saw in a typical case like in Boston when he's having a bad game, we started getting killed at the beginning of the 3rd quarter and Doc gave him the hook. This not only preserved Zu's stats [although he was still a team-worst minus-13 for the game] but also it stopped the bleeding on the court.

Trezz was the only reason we were still in that game, that and Lou's 35 points. And yet this game thread turns into bashing them. Unreal. :roll:

That’s of course the second question, and maybe a harder one to figure out, or maybe not. One way we can attempt to hypothesize is look at two and three man lineups such as Kawhi/Zubac vs Kawhi/Harrell and Lou/Zubac vs Lou/Harrell and Kawhi/George/Zubac vs Kawhi/George/Harrell and try and get a feel for what’s happening there. Of course sample sizes might not be sufficient to make conclusions. Here’s some of that.

With Leonard:
Zubac: 698 mins, 112.5 Ortg, 105.3 Drtg, +7.2 NetRtg
Harrell: 635 mins, 116.8 Ortg, 100.4 Drtg, +16.5 NetRtg

With Williams:
Zubac: 299 mins, 103.1 Ortg, 107.2 Drtg, -4.2 NetRtg
Harrell: 1222 mins, 110.9 Ortg, 106.5 Drtg, +4.4 NetRtg

With Leonard and George:
Zubac: 355 mins, 114.7 Ortg, 104.9 Drtg, +9.8 NetRtg
Harrell: 199 mins, 109.7 Ortg, 97.4 Drtg, +12.3 NetRtg

So the first thing to notice is that when they are on the floor with Kawhi, a combination that has good and similar sample sizes for both, the units with Harrell is really moping the floor with the units that have Zubac. This is certainly a good argument for the coaching staffs use of Harrell. That unit is also 5 points/100 better on defense.

Second is that when you isolate each with Williams, we see that Harrell is actually still winning on both ends, but also that Zubac does not provide enough offensive help and there’s a drastic drop off offensively. Overall there’s a 8.2 point/100 difference in team production, and again, defensively, you’re still getting a better result with Harrell. Large discrepancy in sample size here though.

Now we look at with both George and Leonard, and we see something different offensively, we get a drop there, and maybe surprising to some, but defensively again, the lineups with Harrell win by a large margin, this time 7.5 pts/100 better on defense, and still having a better NetRtg despite being inferior on offense.

That’s a lot of data pointing in one direction and should certainly be analyzed and taken into account.

The Bench Lineups
In terms of the bench struggling defensively, SlayrofDynasties mentioning of the 3 man combination of Williams/Shamet/Harrell is telling, and obviously it makes sense. Two smaller guards like that can be trouble on defense depending on who the players are. With Williams, Shamet will get forced to guard less favourable matchups for him, reducing his defensive effectiveness, and Williams is just not a good defender either way.

Williams/Harrell/Shamet: 460 mins, 110.0 Ortg, 110.9 Drtg, -1.0 NetRtg

BUT, If we add Leonard to the Williams/Shamet combo:
Williams/Leonard/Shamet: 249 mins, 112.9 Ortg, 107.5 Drtg, +5.3 NetRtg

So Kawhi is able to balance out that combination when he plays with them.

Okay, what about having Leonard on with Williams and Harrell?
Leonard/Williams/Harrell: 464 mins, 114.8 Ortg, 98.8 Drtg, +16.0 NetRtg

The lineups with Leonard/Williams/Harrell is actually one of the strongest 3 man combinations on the team. So Kawhi has been a balancing force for the Williams/Harrell combo in a whole season sense, they are elite both on offense and defense for their 464 minutes. If we look at 3 man lineups with 150+ mins, out of the top 15 in Drtg, Harrell is part of 7 of them. In the top 20, he’s part of 10 of the 20. Zubac on the other hand is part of just 1 of the top 15, and that is 12th, and just two in the top 20. Harrell is part of the best 3 man unit with 150+ minutes, Beverley/Leonard/Harrell (246 mins, 122.5 Ortg, 91.1 Drtg, +31.4 NetRtg).


Since January
Piggy backing off the other thread about Williams and Harrell in the New Year, since January:

With Leonard:
Zubac: 293 mins, 115.9 Ortg, 110.5 Drtg, +5.5 NetRtg
Harrell: 225 mins, 120.5 Ortg, 108.8 Drtg, +11.8 NetRtg

With Williams:
Zubac: 121 mins, 103.0 Ortg, 109.3 Drtg, -6.3 NetRtg
Harrell: 456 mins, 110.2 Ortg, 111.7 Drtg, -1.5 NetRtg

With George and Leonard:
Zubac: 83 mins, 114.0 Ortg, 110.7 Drtg, +3.3 NetRtg
Harrell: 32 mins, 113.6 Ortg, 102.9 Drtg, +10.7 NetRtg

Williams/Leonard/Harrell: 171 mins, 118.4 Ortg, 107.6 Drtg, +10.8 NetRtg

I’ll have to say that I did not necessarily expect the numbers to look like this, but if we’re using lineup data and normalizing to an extent for who is on the court with the bigs (Zubac vs Harrell), lineups with Harrell are winning by a landslide when it comes to defense and overall net per possession production. This is both for the season as a whole and since the start of the new year.

So even in that sample size since January, you’re still getting a better result both offensive and defensively when you pair Kawhi and Harrell vs pairing Kawhi and Zubac. Playing either with Williams suggest that you are still getting a better overall result with Harrell, and then combined with the w/Leonard and w/George+Leonard data suggests that Harrell on his own is not giving an inferior defensive result to Zubac, but it is the pieces around them making the difference. The data is actually leaning towards Harrell giving a superior defensive contribution altogether, though it is not comprehensive and complete data to make a definitive statement like that. We also see that the Williams/Leonard/Harrell lineup even in January has been performing very well.


My conclusion form your analysis that Bench Zu and Start Harrell will work. Starters doesn't have problem with defending opponent perimeter players and helping rebounding while bench guys(Shamet-Lou-Mcgruder) does. Enter Zubac to clean the boards. Harrell can Start-Finish game with Kawhi-PG duo. Scoring distribution would be spreaded.
2024-25 Clippers W/L Count against OKC, HOU, PHX, MIN (0-14)
2024-25 Clippers W/L Count against rest of NBA (43-18)
TheNewEra
RealGM
Posts: 28,946
And1: 10,672
Joined: Aug 28, 2008
Location: Lob City
       

Re: Game 55: Los Angeles Clippers (37-17) @ Boston Celtics (37-16) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#130 » by TheNewEra » Sun Feb 16, 2020 2:30 pm

DieHardFan wrote:
og15 wrote:
esqtvd wrote:

Good analysis, rather than opinions and rancid emotions, LOL. But put Zubac out there with the second team instead of the first and you'll see everything including his numbers go to hell.

His numbers are good with the first team because most of those minutes are with Kawhi, who makes everybody look good. And as you saw in a typical case like in Boston when he's having a bad game, we started getting killed at the beginning of the 3rd quarter and Doc gave him the hook. This not only preserved Zu's stats [although he was still a team-worst minus-13 for the game] but also it stopped the bleeding on the court.

Trezz was the only reason we were still in that game, that and Lou's 35 points. And yet this game thread turns into bashing them. Unreal. :roll:

That’s of course the second question, and maybe a harder one to figure out, or maybe not. One way we can attempt to hypothesize is look at two and three man lineups such as Kawhi/Zubac vs Kawhi/Harrell and Lou/Zubac vs Lou/Harrell and Kawhi/George/Zubac vs Kawhi/George/Harrell and try and get a feel for what’s happening there. Of course sample sizes might not be sufficient to make conclusions. Here’s some of that.

With Leonard:
Zubac: 698 mins, 112.5 Ortg, 105.3 Drtg, +7.2 NetRtg
Harrell: 635 mins, 116.8 Ortg, 100.4 Drtg, +16.5 NetRtg

With Williams:
Zubac: 299 mins, 103.1 Ortg, 107.2 Drtg, -4.2 NetRtg
Harrell: 1222 mins, 110.9 Ortg, 106.5 Drtg, +4.4 NetRtg

With Leonard and George:
Zubac: 355 mins, 114.7 Ortg, 104.9 Drtg, +9.8 NetRtg
Harrell: 199 mins, 109.7 Ortg, 97.4 Drtg, +12.3 NetRtg

So the first thing to notice is that when they are on the floor with Kawhi, a combination that has good and similar sample sizes for both, the units with Harrell is really moping the floor with the units that have Zubac. This is certainly a good argument for the coaching staffs use of Harrell. That unit is also 5 points/100 better on defense.

Second is that when you isolate each with Williams, we see that Harrell is actually still winning on both ends, but also that Zubac does not provide enough offensive help and there’s a drastic drop off offensively. Overall there’s a 8.2 point/100 difference in team production, and again, defensively, you’re still getting a better result with Harrell. Large discrepancy in sample size here though.

Now we look at with both George and Leonard, and we see something different offensively, we get a drop there, and maybe surprising to some, but defensively again, the lineups with Harrell win by a large margin, this time 7.5 pts/100 better on defense, and still having a better NetRtg despite being inferior on offense.

That’s a lot of data pointing in one direction and should certainly be analyzed and taken into account.

The Bench Lineups
In terms of the bench struggling defensively, SlayrofDynasties mentioning of the 3 man combination of Williams/Shamet/Harrell is telling, and obviously it makes sense. Two smaller guards like that can be trouble on defense depending on who the players are. With Williams, Shamet will get forced to guard less favourable matchups for him, reducing his defensive effectiveness, and Williams is just not a good defender either way.

Williams/Harrell/Shamet: 460 mins, 110.0 Ortg, 110.9 Drtg, -1.0 NetRtg

BUT, If we add Leonard to the Williams/Shamet combo:
Williams/Leonard/Shamet: 249 mins, 112.9 Ortg, 107.5 Drtg, +5.3 NetRtg

So Kawhi is able to balance out that combination when he plays with them.

Okay, what about having Leonard on with Williams and Harrell?
Leonard/Williams/Harrell: 464 mins, 114.8 Ortg, 98.8 Drtg, +16.0 NetRtg

The lineups with Leonard/Williams/Harrell is actually one of the strongest 3 man combinations on the team. So Kawhi has been a balancing force for the Williams/Harrell combo in a whole season sense, they are elite both on offense and defense for their 464 minutes. If we look at 3 man lineups with 150+ mins, out of the top 15 in Drtg, Harrell is part of 7 of them. In the top 20, he’s part of 10 of the 20. Zubac on the other hand is part of just 1 of the top 15, and that is 12th, and just two in the top 20. Harrell is part of the best 3 man unit with 150+ minutes, Beverley/Leonard/Harrell (246 mins, 122.5 Ortg, 91.1 Drtg, +31.4 NetRtg).


Since January
Piggy backing off the other thread about Williams and Harrell in the New Year, since January:

With Leonard:
Zubac: 293 mins, 115.9 Ortg, 110.5 Drtg, +5.5 NetRtg
Harrell: 225 mins, 120.5 Ortg, 108.8 Drtg, +11.8 NetRtg

With Williams:
Zubac: 121 mins, 103.0 Ortg, 109.3 Drtg, -6.3 NetRtg
Harrell: 456 mins, 110.2 Ortg, 111.7 Drtg, -1.5 NetRtg

With George and Leonard:
Zubac: 83 mins, 114.0 Ortg, 110.7 Drtg, +3.3 NetRtg
Harrell: 32 mins, 113.6 Ortg, 102.9 Drtg, +10.7 NetRtg

Williams/Leonard/Harrell: 171 mins, 118.4 Ortg, 107.6 Drtg, +10.8 NetRtg

I’ll have to say that I did not necessarily expect the numbers to look like this, but if we’re using lineup data and normalizing to an extent for who is on the court with the bigs (Zubac vs Harrell), lineups with Harrell are winning by a landslide when it comes to defense and overall net per possession production. This is both for the season as a whole and since the start of the new year.

So even in that sample size since January, you’re still getting a better result both offensive and defensively when you pair Kawhi and Harrell vs pairing Kawhi and Zubac. Playing either with Williams suggest that you are still getting a better overall result with Harrell, and then combined with the w/Leonard and w/George+Leonard data suggests that Harrell on his own is not giving an inferior defensive result to Zubac, but it is the pieces around them making the difference. The data is actually leaning towards Harrell giving a superior defensive contribution altogether, though it is not comprehensive and complete data to make a definitive statement like that. We also see that the Williams/Leonard/Harrell lineup even in January has been performing very well.


My conclusion form your analysis that Bench Zu and Start Harrell will work. Starters doesn't have problem with defending opponent perimeter players and helping rebounding while bench guys(Shamet-Lou-Mcgruder) does. Enter Zubac to clean the boards. Harrell can Start-Finish game with Kawhi-PG duo. Scoring distribution would be spreaded.


Trez can’t handle the full size and talent difference of starter level players consistently we tried it. That’s why you have to use numbers in context and Trez is usually going against weaker competition off the bench.
User avatar
esqtvd
RealGM
Posts: 12,090
And1: 4,829
Joined: Jun 24, 2017
Location: LA LA LA LAND
Contact:
     

Re: Game 55: Los Angeles Clippers (37-17) @ Boston Celtics (37-16) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#131 » by esqtvd » Sun Feb 16, 2020 9:24 pm

TheNewEra wrote:Trez can’t handle the full size and talent difference of starter level players consistently we tried it. That’s why you have to use numbers in context and Trez is usually going against weaker competition off the bench.



In the larger sense, yes. Trezz is not an NBA starting center. But what OG just proved is that Zubac is not the answer and the Planet Zubac argument [more Zu, therefore less Trezz] is provably contrary to the facts and stats.

Thanks to OG, the numbers ARE in context:


DieHardFan wrote:
og15 wrote:That’s of course the second question, and maybe a harder one to figure out, or maybe not. One way we can attempt to hypothesize is look at two and three man lineups such as Kawhi/Zubac vs Kawhi/Harrell and Lou/Zubac vs Lou/Harrell and Kawhi/George/Zubac vs Kawhi/George/Harrell and try and get a feel for what’s happening there. Of course sample sizes might not be sufficient to make conclusions. Here’s some of that.

With Leonard:
Zubac: 698 mins, 112.5 Ortg, 105.3 Drtg, +7.2 NetRtg
Harrell: 635 mins, 116.8 Ortg, 100.4 Drtg, +16.5 NetRtg

With Williams:
Zubac: 299 mins, 103.1 Ortg, 107.2 Drtg, -4.2 NetRtg
Harrell: 1222 mins, 110.9 Ortg, 106.5 Drtg, +4.4 NetRtg

With Leonard and George:
Zubac: 355 mins, 114.7 Ortg, 104.9 Drtg, +9.8 NetRtg
Harrell: 199 mins, 109.7 Ortg, 97.4 Drtg, +12.3 NetRtg

So the first thing to notice is that when they are on the floor with Kawhi, a combination that has good and similar sample sizes for both, the units with Harrell is really mopping the floor with the units that have Zubac. This is certainly a good argument for the coaching staffs use of Harrell. That unit is also 5 points/100 better on defense.

Second is that when you isolate each with Williams, we see that Harrell is actually still winning on both ends, but also that Zubac does not provide enough offensive help and there’s a drastic drop off offensively. Overall there’s a 8.2 point/100 difference in team production, and again, defensively, you’re still getting a better result with Harrell. Large discrepancy in sample size here though.

Now we look at with both George and Leonard, and we see something different offensively, we get a drop there, and maybe surprising to some, but defensively again, the lineups with Harrell win by a large margin, this time 7.5 pts/100 better on defense, and still having a better NetRtg despite being inferior on offense.

That’s a lot of data pointing in one direction and should certainly be analyzed and taken into account.

The Bench Lineups
In terms of the bench struggling defensively, SlayrofDynasties mentioning of the 3 man combination of Williams/Shamet/Harrell is telling, and obviously it makes sense. Two smaller guards like that can be trouble on defense depending on who the players are. With Williams, Shamet will get forced to guard less favourable matchups for him, reducing his defensive effectiveness, and Williams is just not a good defender either way.

Williams/Harrell/Shamet: 460 mins, 110.0 Ortg, 110.9 Drtg, -1.0 NetRtg

BUT, If we add Leonard to the Williams/Shamet combo:
Williams/Leonard/Shamet: 249 mins, 112.9 Ortg, 107.5 Drtg, +5.3 NetRtg

So Kawhi is able to balance out that combination when he plays with them.

Okay, what about having Leonard on with Williams and Harrell?
Leonard/Williams/Harrell: 464 mins, 114.8 Ortg, 98.8 Drtg, +16.0 NetRtg

The lineups with Leonard/Williams/Harrell is actually one of the strongest 3 man combinations on the team. So Kawhi has been a balancing force for the Williams/Harrell combo in a whole season sense, they are elite both on offense and defense for their 464 minutes. If we look at 3 man lineups with 150+ mins, out of the top 15 in Drtg, Harrell is part of 7 of them. In the top 20, he’s part of 10 of the 20. Zubac on the other hand is part of just 1 of the top 15, and that is 12th, and just two in the top 20. Harrell is part of the best 3 man unit with 150+ minutes, Beverley/Leonard/Harrell (246 mins, 122.5 Ortg, 91.1 Drtg, +31.4 NetRtg).


Since January
Piggy backing off the other thread about Williams and Harrell in the New Year, since January:

With Leonard:
Zubac: 293 mins, 115.9 Ortg, 110.5 Drtg, +5.5 NetRtg
Harrell: 225 mins, 120.5 Ortg, 108.8 Drtg, +11.8 NetRtg

With Williams:
Zubac: 121 mins, 103.0 Ortg, 109.3 Drtg, -6.3 NetRtg
Harrell: 456 mins, 110.2 Ortg, 111.7 Drtg, -1.5 NetRtg

With George and Leonard:
Zubac: 83 mins, 114.0 Ortg, 110.7 Drtg, +3.3 NetRtg
Harrell: 32 mins, 113.6 Ortg, 102.9 Drtg, +10.7 NetRtg

Williams/Leonard/Harrell: 171 mins, 118.4 Ortg, 107.6 Drtg, +10.8 NetRtg

I’ll have to say that I did not necessarily expect the numbers to look like this, but if we’re using lineup data and normalizing to an extent for who is on the court with the bigs (Zubac vs Harrell), lineups with Harrell are winning by a landslide when it comes to defense and overall net per possession production. This is both for the season as a whole and since the start of the new year.

So even in that sample size since January, you’re still getting a better result both offensive and defensively when you pair Kawhi and Harrell vs pairing Kawhi and Zubac. Playing either with Williams suggest that you are still getting a better overall result with Harrell, and then combined with the w/Leonard and w/George+Leonard data suggests that Harrell on his own is not giving an inferior defensive result to Zubac, but it is the pieces around them making the difference. The data is actually leaning towards Harrell giving a superior defensive contribution altogether, though it is not comprehensive and complete data to make a definitive statement like that. We also see that the Williams/Leonard/Harrell lineup even in January has been performing very well.


My conclusion form your analysis that Bench Zu and Start Harrell will work. Starters doesn't have problem with defending opponent perimeter players and helping rebounding while bench guys(Shamet-Lou-Mcgruder) does. Enter Zubac to clean the boards. Harrell can Start-Finish game with Kawhi-PG duo. Scoring distribution would be spreaded.




Everything I've been saying is borne out by the facts. A big HT to OG for digging beneath the surface stats looking for the truth, and surprising both of us that the case for Trezz [and even Lou] is even stronger than you'd think.
Image Are We Having Fun Yet?
User avatar
esqtvd
RealGM
Posts: 12,090
And1: 4,829
Joined: Jun 24, 2017
Location: LA LA LA LAND
Contact:
     

Re: Game 55: Los Angeles Clippers (37-17) @ Boston Celtics (37-16) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#132 » by esqtvd » Sun Feb 16, 2020 9:32 pm

DieHardFan wrote:
og15 wrote:Since January
Piggy backing off the other thread about Williams and Harrell in the New Year, since January:

With Leonard:
Zubac: 293 mins, 115.9 Ortg, 110.5 Drtg, +5.5 NetRtg
Harrell: 225 mins, 120.5 Ortg, 108.8 Drtg, +11.8 NetRtg

With Williams:
Zubac: 121 mins, 103.0 Ortg, 109.3 Drtg, -6.3 NetRtg
Harrell: 456 mins, 110.2 Ortg, 111.7 Drtg, -1.5 NetRtg

With George and Leonard:
Zubac: 83 mins, 114.0 Ortg, 110.7 Drtg, +3.3 NetRtg
Harrell: 32 mins, 113.6 Ortg, 102.9 Drtg, +10.7 NetRtg

Williams/Leonard/Harrell: 171 mins, 118.4 Ortg, 107.6 Drtg, +10.8 NetRtg

I’ll have to say that I did not necessarily expect the numbers to look like this, but if we’re using lineup data and normalizing to an extent for who is on the court with the bigs (Zubac vs Harrell), lineups with Harrell are winning by a landslide when it comes to defense and overall net per possession production. This is both for the season as a whole and since the start of the new year.

So even in that sample size since January, you’re still getting a better result both offensive and defensively when you pair Kawhi and Harrell vs pairing Kawhi and Zubac. Playing either with Williams suggest that you are still getting a better overall result with Harrell, and then combined with the w/Leonard and w/George+Leonard data suggests that Harrell on his own is not giving an inferior defensive result to Zubac, but it is the pieces around them making the difference. The data is actually leaning towards Harrell giving a superior defensive contribution altogether, though it is not comprehensive and complete data to make a definitive statement like that. We also see that the Williams/Leonard/Harrell lineup even in January has been performing very well.


My conclusion form your analysis that Bench Zu and Start Harrell will work. Starters doesn't have problem with defending opponent perimeter players and helping rebounding while bench guys(Shamet-Lou-Mcgruder) does. Enter Zubac to clean the boards. Harrell can Start-Finish game with Kawhi-PG duo. Scoring distribution would be spreaded.




I'll go so far as to defend the status quo. We need 18-20 minutes from Zubac, as we don't want Trezz at more that 28-30, and less if possible. I like Zubac as the placeholder starter, and IMO you can NOT play him with the 2nd unit, without Kawhi and with Lou [Lou and Zu together just doesn't work and the stats prove it]. But there are many games Zubac does just fine and can safely be given minutes on the high end of his range. If he gets 24 minutes, it's undoubtedly a win. If he gets less than 18, we're probably in trouble.

But it's Zubac, not Doc, who determines how many minutes he gets.
Image Are We Having Fun Yet?
TheNewEra
RealGM
Posts: 28,946
And1: 10,672
Joined: Aug 28, 2008
Location: Lob City
       

Re: Game 55: Los Angeles Clippers (37-17) @ Boston Celtics (37-16) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#133 » by TheNewEra » Mon Feb 17, 2020 12:26 am

esqtvd wrote:
TheNewEra wrote:Trez can’t handle the full size and talent difference of starter level players consistently we tried it. That’s why you have to use numbers in context and Trez is usually going against weaker competition off the bench.



In the larger sense, yes. Trezz is not an NBA starting center. But what OG just proved is that Zubac is not the answer and the Planet Zubac argument [more Zu, therefore less Trezz] is provably contrary to the facts and stats.

Thanks to OG, the numbers ARE in context:


DieHardFan wrote:
og15 wrote:That’s of course the second question, and maybe a harder one to figure out, or maybe not. One way we can attempt to hypothesize is look at two and three man lineups such as Kawhi/Zubac vs Kawhi/Harrell and Lou/Zubac vs Lou/Harrell and Kawhi/George/Zubac vs Kawhi/George/Harrell and try and get a feel for what’s happening there. Of course sample sizes might not be sufficient to make conclusions. Here’s some of that.

With Leonard:
Zubac: 698 mins, 112.5 Ortg, 105.3 Drtg, +7.2 NetRtg
Harrell: 635 mins, 116.8 Ortg, 100.4 Drtg, +16.5 NetRtg

With Williams:
Zubac: 299 mins, 103.1 Ortg, 107.2 Drtg, -4.2 NetRtg
Harrell: 1222 mins, 110.9 Ortg, 106.5 Drtg, +4.4 NetRtg

With Leonard and George:
Zubac: 355 mins, 114.7 Ortg, 104.9 Drtg, +9.8 NetRtg
Harrell: 199 mins, 109.7 Ortg, 97.4 Drtg, +12.3 NetRtg

So the first thing to notice is that when they are on the floor with Kawhi, a combination that has good and similar sample sizes for both, the units with Harrell is really mopping the floor with the units that have Zubac. This is certainly a good argument for the coaching staffs use of Harrell. That unit is also 5 points/100 better on defense.

Second is that when you isolate each with Williams, we see that Harrell is actually still winning on both ends, but also that Zubac does not provide enough offensive help and there’s a drastic drop off offensively. Overall there’s a 8.2 point/100 difference in team production, and again, defensively, you’re still getting a better result with Harrell. Large discrepancy in sample size here though.

Now we look at with both George and Leonard, and we see something different offensively, we get a drop there, and maybe surprising to some, but defensively again, the lineups with Harrell win by a large margin, this time 7.5 pts/100 better on defense, and still having a better NetRtg despite being inferior on offense.

That’s a lot of data pointing in one direction and should certainly be analyzed and taken into account.

The Bench Lineups
In terms of the bench struggling defensively, SlayrofDynasties mentioning of the 3 man combination of Williams/Shamet/Harrell is telling, and obviously it makes sense. Two smaller guards like that can be trouble on defense depending on who the players are. With Williams, Shamet will get forced to guard less favourable matchups for him, reducing his defensive effectiveness, and Williams is just not a good defender either way.

Williams/Harrell/Shamet: 460 mins, 110.0 Ortg, 110.9 Drtg, -1.0 NetRtg

BUT, If we add Leonard to the Williams/Shamet combo:
Williams/Leonard/Shamet: 249 mins, 112.9 Ortg, 107.5 Drtg, +5.3 NetRtg

So Kawhi is able to balance out that combination when he plays with them.

Okay, what about having Leonard on with Williams and Harrell?
Leonard/Williams/Harrell: 464 mins, 114.8 Ortg, 98.8 Drtg, +16.0 NetRtg

The lineups with Leonard/Williams/Harrell is actually one of the strongest 3 man combinations on the team. So Kawhi has been a balancing force for the Williams/Harrell combo in a whole season sense, they are elite both on offense and defense for their 464 minutes. If we look at 3 man lineups with 150+ mins, out of the top 15 in Drtg, Harrell is part of 7 of them. In the top 20, he’s part of 10 of the 20. Zubac on the other hand is part of just 1 of the top 15, and that is 12th, and just two in the top 20. Harrell is part of the best 3 man unit with 150+ minutes, Beverley/Leonard/Harrell (246 mins, 122.5 Ortg, 91.1 Drtg, +31.4 NetRtg).


Since January
Piggy backing off the other thread about Williams and Harrell in the New Year, since January:

With Leonard:
Zubac: 293 mins, 115.9 Ortg, 110.5 Drtg, +5.5 NetRtg
Harrell: 225 mins, 120.5 Ortg, 108.8 Drtg, +11.8 NetRtg

With Williams:
Zubac: 121 mins, 103.0 Ortg, 109.3 Drtg, -6.3 NetRtg
Harrell: 456 mins, 110.2 Ortg, 111.7 Drtg, -1.5 NetRtg

With George and Leonard:
Zubac: 83 mins, 114.0 Ortg, 110.7 Drtg, +3.3 NetRtg
Harrell: 32 mins, 113.6 Ortg, 102.9 Drtg, +10.7 NetRtg

Williams/Leonard/Harrell: 171 mins, 118.4 Ortg, 107.6 Drtg, +10.8 NetRtg

I’ll have to say that I did not necessarily expect the numbers to look like this, but if we’re using lineup data and normalizing to an extent for who is on the court with the bigs (Zubac vs Harrell), lineups with Harrell are winning by a landslide when it comes to defense and overall net per possession production. This is both for the season as a whole and since the start of the new year.

So even in that sample size since January, you’re still getting a better result both offensive and defensively when you pair Kawhi and Harrell vs pairing Kawhi and Zubac. Playing either with Williams suggest that you are still getting a better overall result with Harrell, and then combined with the w/Leonard and w/George+Leonard data suggests that Harrell on his own is not giving an inferior defensive result to Zubac, but it is the pieces around them making the difference. The data is actually leaning towards Harrell giving a superior defensive contribution altogether, though it is not comprehensive and complete data to make a definitive statement like that. We also see that the Williams/Leonard/Harrell lineup even in January has been performing very well.


My conclusion form your analysis that Bench Zu and Start Harrell will work. Starters doesn't have problem with defending opponent perimeter players and helping rebounding while bench guys(Shamet-Lou-Mcgruder) does. Enter Zubac to clean the boards. Harrell can Start-Finish game with Kawhi-PG duo. Scoring distribution would be spreaded.




Everything I've been saying is borne out by the facts. A big HT to OG for digging beneath the surface stats looking for the truth, and surprising both of us that the case for Trezz [and even Lou] is even stronger than you'd think.



The starters have also been dealing with injuries and constant rotation swaps all season. The fact Zubac has been the one constant game in and out on a contender at 22 years old can’t be overlooked. No one expects Zubac to be light years better than Harrell who is entering his prime but the fact the numbers are close and it’s his first full year as a starter is encouraging.

It’s also obvious the more Harrell plays the less productive he becomes from fatigue. So play Zu, Green, the ball boy or whoever more and stop overplaying Trez
TheNewEra
RealGM
Posts: 28,946
And1: 10,672
Joined: Aug 28, 2008
Location: Lob City
       

Re: Game 55: Los Angeles Clippers (37-17) @ Boston Celtics (37-16) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#134 » by TheNewEra » Mon Feb 17, 2020 12:32 am

esqtvd wrote:
DieHardFan wrote:
og15 wrote:Since January
Piggy backing off the other thread about Williams and Harrell in the New Year, since January:

With Leonard:
Zubac: 293 mins, 115.9 Ortg, 110.5 Drtg, +5.5 NetRtg
Harrell: 225 mins, 120.5 Ortg, 108.8 Drtg, +11.8 NetRtg

With Williams:
Zubac: 121 mins, 103.0 Ortg, 109.3 Drtg, -6.3 NetRtg
Harrell: 456 mins, 110.2 Ortg, 111.7 Drtg, -1.5 NetRtg

With George and Leonard:
Zubac: 83 mins, 114.0 Ortg, 110.7 Drtg, +3.3 NetRtg
Harrell: 32 mins, 113.6 Ortg, 102.9 Drtg, +10.7 NetRtg

Williams/Leonard/Harrell: 171 mins, 118.4 Ortg, 107.6 Drtg, +10.8 NetRtg

I’ll have to say that I did not necessarily expect the numbers to look like this, but if we’re using lineup data and normalizing to an extent for who is on the court with the bigs (Zubac vs Harrell), lineups with Harrell are winning by a landslide when it comes to defense and overall net per possession production. This is both for the season as a whole and since the start of the new year.

So even in that sample size since January, you’re still getting a better result both offensive and defensively when you pair Kawhi and Harrell vs pairing Kawhi and Zubac. Playing either with Williams suggest that you are still getting a better overall result with Harrell, and then combined with the w/Leonard and w/George+Leonard data suggests that Harrell on his own is not giving an inferior defensive result to Zubac, but it is the pieces around them making the difference. The data is actually leaning towards Harrell giving a superior defensive contribution altogether, though it is not comprehensive and complete data to make a definitive statement like that. We also see that the Williams/Leonard/Harrell lineup even in January has been performing very well.


My conclusion form your analysis that Bench Zu and Start Harrell will work. Starters doesn't have problem with defending opponent perimeter players and helping rebounding while bench guys(Shamet-Lou-Mcgruder) does. Enter Zubac to clean the boards. Harrell can Start-Finish game with Kawhi-PG duo. Scoring distribution would be spreaded.




I'll go so far as to defend the status quo. We need 18-20 minutes from Zubac, as we don't want Trezz at more that 28-30, and less if possible. I like Zubac as the placeholder starter, and IMO you can NOT play him with the 2nd unit, without Kawhi and with Lou [Lou and Zu together just doesn't work and the stats prove it]. But there are many games Zubac does just fine and can safely be given minutes on the high end of his range. If he gets 24 minutes, it's undoubtedly a win. If he gets less than 18, we're probably in trouble.

But it's Zubac, not Doc, who determines how many minutes he gets
.



Simply not true you saw the second half of that Boston game if you really think Trez was productive you are reaching. From turnovers to blown shots and defensive assignments he was all over the place and the only reason it was overlooked was because Lou was shooting well. It’s not a issue until the opposing team is doing a layup drill for a quarter and 2 overtime’s with no adjustments.

This is where Doc earns the bulk of the criticism because the priority to outshoot the other team instead of defense
User avatar
esqtvd
RealGM
Posts: 12,090
And1: 4,829
Joined: Jun 24, 2017
Location: LA LA LA LAND
Contact:
     

Re: Game 55: Los Angeles Clippers (37-17) @ Boston Celtics (37-16) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#135 » by esqtvd » Mon Feb 17, 2020 1:02 am

TheNewEra wrote:
esqtvd wrote:
DieHardFan wrote:
My conclusion form your analysis that Bench Zu and Start Harrell will work. Starters doesn't have problem with defending opponent perimeter players and helping rebounding while bench guys(Shamet-Lou-Mcgruder) does. Enter Zubac to clean the boards. Harrell can Start-Finish game with Kawhi-PG duo. Scoring distribution would be spreaded.




I'll go so far as to defend the status quo. We need 18-20 minutes from Zubac, as we don't want Trezz at more that 28-30, and less if possible. I like Zubac as the placeholder starter, and IMO you can NOT play him with the 2nd unit, without Kawhi and with Lou [Lou and Zu together just doesn't work and the stats prove it]. But there are many games Zubac does just fine and can safely be given minutes on the high end of his range. If he gets 24 minutes, it's undoubtedly a win. If he gets less than 18, we're probably in trouble.

But it's Zubac, not Doc, who determines how many minutes he gets
.



Simply not true you saw the second half of that Boston game if you really think Trez was productive you are reaching. From turnovers to blown shots and defensive assignments he was all over the place and the only reason it was overlooked was because Lou was shooting well. It’s not a issue until the opposing team is doing a layup drill for a quarter and 2 overtime’s with no adjustments.

This is where Doc earns the bulk of the criticism because the priority to outshoot the other team instead of defense



believe what you want but
nothing in the facts supports your assertions

Zu was AWFUL in the Boston game [minus-13 in only 12 minutes] and we only stayed in it because Doc yanked him

a lot of bias in "eye tests"
even if Trezz is tiring---and I would attribute it more to facing better competition in the 4th quarter---
it is Zubac who becomes even less effective with more minutes

and there is nothing in the stats to support Zubac being better on D
and he is nowhere near as good on offense


og15 wrote:That’s of course the second question, and maybe a harder one to figure out, or maybe not. One way we can attempt to hypothesize is look at two and three man lineups such as Kawhi/Zubac vs Kawhi/Harrell and Lou/Zubac vs Lou/Harrell and Kawhi/George/Zubac vs Kawhi/George/Harrell and try and get a feel for what’s happening there. Of course sample sizes might not be sufficient to make conclusions. Here’s some of that.

With Leonard:
Zubac: 698 mins, 112.5 Ortg, 105.3 Drtg, +7.2 NetRtg
Harrell: 635 mins, 116.8 Ortg, 100.4 Drtg, +16.5 NetRtg

With Williams:
Zubac: 299 mins, 103.1 Ortg, 107.2 Drtg, -4.2 NetRtg
Harrell: 1222 mins, 110.9 Ortg, 106.5 Drtg, +4.4 NetRtg

With Leonard and George:
Zubac: 355 mins, 114.7 Ortg, 104.9 Drtg, +9.8 NetRtg
Harrell: 199 mins, 109.7 Ortg, 97.4 Drtg, +12.3 NetRtg

So the first thing to notice is that when they are on the floor with Kawhi, a combination that has good and similar sample sizes for both, the units with Harrell are really mopping the floor with the units that have Zubac. This is certainly a good argument for the coaching staff's use of Harrell. That unit is also 5 points/100 better on defense.

Second is that when you isolate each with Williams, we see that Harrell is actually still winning on both ends, but also that Zubac does not provide enough offensive help and there’s a drastic drop off offensively.
Overall there’s a 8.2 point/100 difference in team production, and again, defensively, you’re still getting a better result with Harrell. Large discrepancy in sample size here though.

Now we look at with both George and Leonard, and we see something different offensively, we get a drop there, and maybe surprising to some, but defensively again, the lineups with Harrell win by a large margin, this time 7.5 pts/100 better on defense, and still having a better NetRtg despite being inferior on offense.

That’s a lot of data pointing in one direction and should certainly be analyzed and taken into account.

The Bench Lineups
In terms of the bench struggling defensively, SlayrofDynasties mentioning of the 3 man combination of Williams/Shamet/Harrell is telling, and obviously it makes sense. Two smaller guards like that can be trouble on defense depending on who the players are. With Williams, Shamet will get forced to guard less favourable matchups for him, reducing his defensive effectiveness, and Williams is just not a good defender either way.

Williams/Harrell/Shamet: 460 mins, 110.0 Ortg, 110.9 Drtg, -1.0 NetRtg

BUT, If we add Leonard to the Williams/Shamet combo:
Williams/Leonard/Shamet: 249 mins, 112.9 Ortg, 107.5 Drtg, +5.3 NetRtg

So Kawhi is able to balance out that combination when he plays with them.

Okay, what about having Leonard on with Williams and Harrell?
Leonard/Williams/Harrell: 464 mins, 114.8 Ortg, 98.8 Drtg, +16.0 NetRtg

The lineups with Leonard/Williams/Harrell is actually one of the strongest 3 man combinations on the team. So Kawhi has been a balancing force for the Williams/Harrell combo in a whole season sense, they are elite both on offense and defense for their 464 minutes. If we look at 3 man lineups with 150+ mins, out of the top 15 in Drtg, Harrell is part of 7 of them. In the top 20, he’s part of 10 of the 20. Zubac on the other hand is part of just 1 of the top 15, and that is 12th, and just two in the top 20. Harrell is part of the best 3 man unit with 150+ minutes, Beverley/Leonard/Harrell (246 mins, 122.5 Ortg, 91.1 Drtg, +31.4 NetRtg).


Since January
Piggy backing off the other thread about Williams and Harrell in the New Year, since January:

With Leonard:
Zubac: 293 mins, 115.9 Ortg, 110.5 Drtg, +5.5 NetRtg
Harrell: 225 mins, 120.5 Ortg, 108.8 Drtg, +11.8 NetRtg

With Williams:
Zubac: 121 mins, 103.0 Ortg, 109.3 Drtg, -6.3 NetRtg
Harrell: 456 mins, 110.2 Ortg, 111.7 Drtg, -1.5 NetRtg

With George and Leonard:
Zubac: 83 mins, 114.0 Ortg, 110.7 Drtg, +3.3 NetRtg
Harrell: 32 mins, 113.6 Ortg, 102.9 Drtg, +10.7 NetRtg

Williams/Leonard/Harrell: 171 mins, 118.4 Ortg, 107.6 Drtg, +10.8 NetRtg

I’ll have to say that I did not necessarily expect the numbers to look like this, but if we’re using lineup data and normalizing to an extent for who is on the court with the bigs (Zubac vs Harrell), lineups with Harrell are winning by a landslide when it comes to defense and overall net per possession production. This is both for the season as a whole and since the start of the new year.

So even in that sample size since January, you’re still getting a better result both offensive and defensively when you pair Kawhi and Harrell vs pairing Kawhi and Zubac.





If you have any facts or evidence to challenge OG's research and analysis, please do post it. I think he did a conclusive job, props.
Image Are We Having Fun Yet?
og15
Forum Mod - Clippers
Forum Mod - Clippers
Posts: 50,693
And1: 33,476
Joined: Jun 23, 2004
Location: NBA Fan
 

Re: Game 55: Los Angeles Clippers (37-17) @ Boston Celtics (37-16) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#136 » by og15 » Wed Feb 19, 2020 1:40 am

50CalClips wrote:
og15 wrote:
50CalClips wrote:Glen plays "accidental Basketball"

At 28:50...


I looked at 28:50 and I don't think that's what you meant to cite, lol

What, did you listened to 3 seconds of it? They're finishing up talking about the significance of the number "24" just before.

That's when they when they start talking about style of play, game-planning, running plays, structure(and freedom), counters (aka, "options"), well-coached, well-informed, well-discipline, team basketball, etc... a GREAT chuck of the podcast... 28:50 is right around they start the topic. They finish up/change topics again at around 31:00.

    The Great Kobe Bryant - "That helped me game-plan. These players now play accidental basketball. It drives me and Phil crazy, cuz it's all penetrate and pitch... it's accidental basketball, we played basketball with purpose" He then gives a specific example.

Glen runs a loose Clippers ship.


(P.S. - I'm not suggesting that Kobe said it specifically about Glen, to be clear. It's that the idea of "accidental basketball" juxtaposed to disciplined, structured, informed basketball)

Oh okay, I listened to a minute and was waiting for accidental basketball to come up, they were talking about the triangle, nothing came up and not knowing when this was supposed to appear, I wasn't planning on listening to it any extensive amount of it. I see that Kobe starts to mention it at 30:10, needed to give it another 20 seconds or so.

D'Antoni could be argued as the master of what Kobe refers to as accidental basketball, though I think Kobe oversimplifies it. Technically those read and react systems are being classified as "accidental basketball", but the purpose of those systems is that you are breaking down the defense, forcing them to rotate and reacting based on what the defense does. In addition, many coaches will have reads and cuts that come out of for example, heavy pick and roll (Nash Suns) or even the current Rockets heavy isolation basketball have some off ball reads, though D'Antoni has really worked on simplifying things in that system.

I do agree that you can get in trouble with that gameplan depending on your overall team talent level, opponents, etc, but I think the suggestion that this is what the Clippers are doing lacks a nuanced view of the team.
User avatar
esqtvd
RealGM
Posts: 12,090
And1: 4,829
Joined: Jun 24, 2017
Location: LA LA LA LAND
Contact:
     

Re: Game 55: Los Angeles Clippers (37-17) @ Boston Celtics (37-16) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#137 » by esqtvd » Wed Feb 19, 2020 4:32 am

og15 wrote:
50CalClips wrote:
og15 wrote:I looked at 28:50 and I don't think that's what you meant to cite, lol

What, did you listened to 3 seconds of it? They're finishing up talking about the significance of the number "24" just before.

That's when they when they start talking about style of play, game-planning, running plays, structure(and freedom), counters (aka, "options"), well-coached, well-informed, well-discipline, team basketball, etc... a GREAT chuck of the podcast... 28:50 is right around they start the topic. They finish up/change topics again at around 31:00.

    The Great Kobe Bryant - "That helped me game-plan. These players now play accidental basketball. It drives me and Phil crazy, cuz it's all penetrate and pitch... it's accidental basketball, we played basketball with purpose" He then gives a specific example.

Glen runs a loose Clippers ship.


(P.S. - I'm not suggesting that Kobe said it specifically about Glen, to be clear. It's that the idea of "accidental basketball" juxtaposed to disciplined, structured, informed basketball)

Oh okay, I listened to a minute and was waiting for accidental basketball to come up, they were talking about the triangle, nothing came up and not knowing when this was supposed to appear, I wasn't planning on listening to it any extensive amount of it. I see that Kobe starts to mention it at 30:10, needed to give it another 20 seconds or so.

D'Antoni could be argued as the master of what Kobe refers to as accidental basketball, though I think Kobe oversimplifies it. Technically those read and react systems are being classified as "accidental basketball", but the purpose of those systems is that you are breaking down the defense, forcing them to rotate and reacting based on what the defense does. In addition, many coaches will have reads and cuts that come out of for example, heavy pick and roll (Nash Suns) or even the current Rockets heavy isolation basketball have some off ball reads, though D'Antoni has really worked on simplifying things in that system.

I do agree that you can get in trouble with that gameplan depending on your overall team talent level, opponents, etc, but I think the suggestion that this is what the Clippers are doing lacks a nuanced view of the team.




Let's start at the end of the story and work back: The Triangle is dead. Dead, buried, dug up, cremated and its ashes scattered to the wind. And it was Phil Jackson as GM of the Knicks who killed it forever.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/29/sports/basketball/phil-jackson-new-york-knicks.html


To begin with, it was iso-heavy and only worked because you had a Jordan or a Kobe to start with, maybe the two best iso players of all time.


    ON PRO BASKETBALL

    Phil Jackson’s Beloved Triangle: A Symbol of Hubris



    A more clearheaded Jackson might have backtracked on Anthony when he realized that Anthony, because of Jackson’s own malpractice, had all the leverage, and that the residual effects of the impasse were putting the franchise on the brink of implosion.

    But, yes, it was apparently still about the triangle, the sword he fell on.

    On Facebook, Rosen, at least, seemed not to have learned anything from the debacle. He wrote: “If you had a thorough understanding of the triangle, you would understand some of his moves — but obviously you don’t — and don’t give me that M.J., Pip, Kobe, Shaq stuff. Remember how well the Bulls did when M. J. was playing baseball.”



The Triangle is heavily structured and leans on 2-to-3 hypertalented players. The other players don't like it or want to play it, and with free agency so fluid now, they don't have to. Simply put, they WON'T. It's no fun. They'll go elsewhere.

[Just look at how many players have just turned down the chance to play "alongside" LeBron. No, it's not the Triangle, but it might as well be.]



    What would Red Holzman, who was Phil Jackson’s first coaching mentor in professional basketball, have said about Jackson’s ultimately self-sabotaging devotion to an offensive system, the triangle, that his players in New York didn’t want to play and his coaches didn’t want to coach?

    Nothing, publicly, for Holzman preferred a root canal without anesthesia to sharing on-the-record criticism of anyone, on his team or another. Ah, but in the shelter of a relaxed moment offstage, Holzman would have flashed a crooked half-smile and begun with a frog-throated “heh heh” before explaining that a so-called system was an excellent deal for the coach in maintaining job security, or a reputation as a genius.

    If the team won, the system was brilliant. If it didn’t, the players didn’t fit the system. A modest but confident man, Holzman despised the posturing of the look-at-me coach, and that included Red Auerbach with his obnoxious victory cigars.

    Holzman’s most essential tenet was not to program his players to the point of paralysis. Let them play, as long as they made the extra pass — and played defense.


Let them play. The Triangle is dead. Larry Brown's Pistons team was a one-year freak. For this Clippers team--which is not a young team--they need rest more than drills and programming. This is the NBA, not the NCAA.

    True, Holzman’s squads, still the only champions in the history of the Knicks, consisted of men blessed with exceptional basketball I.Q.s and the ability to improvise within the team concept. What they largely lacked, across the lineup that included Jackson as a long-limbed defensive nuisance, was the enhanced athleticism of the 21st-century player, and the freedom to operate in the ever-expanding shot-launching areas of the court.

21st century basketball, like 1960s basketball, is a 5-man game. Doc's approach is no different than Red's. Back to the Future.


And BTW, calling Doc "Glen" just poisons your own well, bro. It tells us that that what we're about to read is going to be negative, and probably not very well-informed.

For one thing, it's "Glenn." :wink:
Image Are We Having Fun Yet?
User avatar
50CalClips
Rookie
Posts: 1,066
And1: 324
Joined: Jul 25, 2019
   

Re: Game 55: Los Angeles Clippers (37-17) @ Boston Celtics (37-16) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#138 » by 50CalClips » Sun Feb 23, 2020 7:08 pm

og15 wrote:
50CalClips wrote:...
Glen runs a loose Clippers ship.

(P.S. - I'm not suggesting that Kobe said it specifically about Glen, to be clear. It's that the idea of "accidental basketball" juxtaposed to disciplined, structured, informed basketball)

Oh okay, I listened to a minute and was waiting for accidental basketball to come up, they were talking about the triangle, nothing came up and not knowing when this was supposed to appear, I wasn't planning on listening to it any extensive amount of it. I see that Kobe starts to mention it at 30:10, needed to give it another 20 seconds or so.

D'Antoni could be argued as the master of what Kobe refers to as accidental basketball, though I think Kobe oversimplifies it. Technically those read and react systems are being classified as "accidental basketball", but the purpose of those systems is that you are breaking down the defense, forcing them to rotate and reacting based on what the defense does. In addition, many coaches will have reads and cuts that come out of for example, heavy pick and roll (Nash Suns) or even the current Rockets heavy isolation basketball have some off ball reads, though D'Antoni has really worked on simplifying things in that system.

I do agree that you can get in trouble with that gameplan depending on your overall team talent level, opponents, etc, but I think the suggestion that this is what the Clippers are doing lacks a nuanced view of the team.


It's all too loosey goosey.

You see it with Paul George running right into trouble (Turnovers) with no one/nothing prepared for a second/third option, OVER and OVER again... no change, no adjustment, no improvement over the season.

The team's 3-shooting is under-utilized/not exploited... it's as if it's an afterthought rather than it being integral to the game plan/strategy. Shamet in particular -- seems like there hasn't been much fostering his "Splash brother"-type abilities (zipping around, dragging defenders, creating opps... catch-n-shoot quick trigger). Kawhi and George could've been such a dynamic pairing (in regards to the 3)... both can penetrate and draw double-teams, both are good-to-great 3FG% shooters, and both are capable passers. Kawhi and George SHOULD BE an amazing duo, playing off of each other, being each others 2nd option. When George drives, Kawhi is primed and ready at the 3... when Kawhi is working and drawin doubles/triples, George is ready for the 3. That relationship should be a whole lot more symbiotic than it is.

And it's the Defense too.

There's no mindfulness, no unity/team-defense (only seen it in spurts). We have all of these (supposed) great individual Defensive "Dawgs" all over the place (supposed to be "Clamp City" Clippers)... why hasn't it shown up? WTF do Coaches do if not get players ready, primed to optimize their individual and collective skills?

Coaching is preparation. The more and more I see from this team the more it seems that Glen aint about that life.
User avatar
MartinToVaught
RealGM
Posts: 15,705
And1: 17,777
Joined: Oct 19, 2014
     

Re: Game 55: Los Angeles Clippers (37-17) @ Boston Celtics (37-16) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#139 » by MartinToVaught » Sun Feb 23, 2020 10:58 pm

50CalClips wrote:We have all of these (supposed) great individual Defensive "Dawgs" all over the place (supposed to be "Clamp City" Clippers)... why hasn't it shown up?

I'd say a big reason for that is because our coach gives tons of minutes to our worst defenders at the expense of players who can actually defend. All Doc has ever cared about is volume scoring. It's been a recurring issue the entire time he's been here and (IMO) the main reason why we've constantly blown leads - both in-game leads and series leads.
Image
User avatar
QRich3
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 5,844
And1: 3,947
Joined: Apr 03, 2011
 

Re: Game 55: Los Angeles Clippers (37-17) @ Boston Celtics (37-16) - 8:00 PM ET 

Post#140 » by QRich3 » Mon Feb 24, 2020 11:54 am

We have the 6th best defense, 1 point-per-100-poss away from being top 3 though? and we have a better defense than an offense, relative to league average? With the guy that was 3rd in the DPOY voting missing almost half the season? and the guy that was 9th in the DPOY voting missing like a 3rd of the season? I'm afraid the narrative doesn't match reality there.

Return to Los Angeles Clippers