RingColluder wrote:Esq, I'm curious what your thoughts are on of the +/- from this game? (Note: I'm not a big believer in it, but wondering how'd you see it given the discrepancy)
Zu and Kawhi (who supposedly had a "bad game" to some here) with a team high +21 and +20.
IN 3rd Morris at +14.
And surprisingly PG and Reggie at only +6, both who I thought played relatively well.
So despite the "off game" from Kawhi, he'd be one of the top players from this game? Or that point is only relevant when it concerns negatives and Rondo/Boogie/Batum?
Kawhi: 13 points plus+20.

That's why I like +/- and why I follow it DURING the game. It's a multi-variable graph

Did the yellow influence the blue and did they both together or separately influence the green and red??
Ty balanced giving PT, trying unfamiliar combinations and winning the game wonderfully tonight, and the RUNNING plus/minus was right there. Mann was benched after only 6 minutes [zero points, minus-6]; Cousins was 7/6 but minus-11 in 14 minutes; and Batum was minus-12 in 20 minutes, no help either. [Batum is your plus/minus glue guy; you ignore his other stats if he's plus+10 or more].
But it was more than following the stats--playing with the LAME 2nd unit, Pat Bev was in the minus, but once Ty put him in with the FIRST UNIT--pressuring the ball--Pat's plus/minus shot up and we took the lead.
It's not all about stats bro. Otherwise the best coach would be a robot. If you look at the game thread of the Suns loss, I said we missed Pat's pressure on the ball and the Suns were getting whatever shots they wanted. It still comes down to the players on the court. T-Mann and Reggie have filled in adequately for Pat Bev, but the Clippers at our best with Bev out there ATTACKING the ball as only he can, the best in the business. Then they are playing uphill, not downhill.
Thanks for asking. It's an art AND a science. Even though T-Mann often ended up on the minus, Ty kept putting his energy out there to lift the energy level of what is frankly a pretty low-energy team. I agreed completely, even when the raw numbers didn't support it.