og15 wrote:DowNY wrote:og15 wrote:Like I've said before, if any of them gets traded, the obvious one should be DJ as long as he can get you the right return. He's the least "star" like of the three guys, and to me Blake is the guy you should be adjusting your roster to fit around, not DJ.
....but, I also think there are some deals out there you can get for him that make sense.
http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/240608/Doc-Rivers-Would-Prefer-To-Trade-Away-Blake-Griffin-If-Clippers-Break-Up-Core
I'm very aware of this, I already knew this before it was even posted as I listened to Lowe's podcast and he mentioned it, that doesn't mean I agree with that or I believe that the Clippers would actually do this.
Funny thing is, in that podcast before he did the stupid article, Lowe said "some people around the league said if he were to trade one of the three it'd be Blake, I don't believe it but that's what I hear" or something like that. It's pretty obvious then ESPN wanted to cash in on the Blake controversy and commissioned the article to get some clicks. He even starts the article by saying "I don't think they should trade him" and ends it with "they should trade Jordan or Paul before they trade him". Yet his editor puts the headline "Maybe the Clippers should trade Blake Griffin". Gotta love journalism these days
Basically he heard some rival execs stir up some sh*t and for the sake of clicks everywhere, the headlines turn into "Blake about to be traded" and everyone is offering their sh*tty 3rd rate packages like it's a real possibility for them.
This will blow over soon and people will be back to saying Paul is declining cause this is Blake's team in no time, or whatever knee jerk reaction the boxscores dictate that week.






























