ImageImageImageImageImage

Trade Idea Thread II

Moderators: og15, TrueLAfan

Method28
Junior
Posts: 499
And1: 356
Joined: Feb 17, 2012

 

Post#1461 » by Method28 » Sun Jul 5, 2015 9:27 pm

I don't move Cp3 or Blake at this point, pretty much at all. Barring a deal that blows me away.
fuzzy1
Senior
Posts: 555
And1: 293
Joined: Jun 20, 2010

Re: Trade Idea Thread II 

Post#1462 » by fuzzy1 » Sun Jul 5, 2015 10:22 pm

nickhx2 wrote:i wouldn't say flooded, and i think we should appreciate discussion during the offseason when there's not much to talk about.

however, there's not a whole lot to talk about when deals are lopsided to that effect. again, superstar trades require superstar returns. what star power is there in a teague/schroeder trade? you do realize that cp3 has been the best PG in the league for many years now right? like by a LOT. and he is one of the best of all time too?

i like teague. i hope schroeder sheds his baby rondo title and becomes way better than that asshat. but they aren't on the same level value wise as cp3 and they aren't going to grow into top 15 players. and to get you gotta give, especially for someone like cp3. if you don't feel uncomfortable by what you gave up and you're not sweating a bit, then you basically ripped off that team by a large margin.


anyway to answer the question you brought up: what would the team expect?

at least 1-2 young star players, 1 great draft pick, and 1-ish solid players, not including fillers. some guy on T/T forums was babbling on about lawson, nurkic for cp3. it's of my opinion the only way denver can trade for cp3 is if they give up nurkic/mudiay/two first-rounders, at minimum.

the clips are still really just 2 pieces away from being where they need to be. next year might suck but the year after actually can be pretty good. jordan leaving is not the end of the world so we don't have to make dramatic changes. but giving up cp3 is tantamount to blowing it all up. and you don't blow it up by asking for fillers.


Fair enough. So you would expect a complete blow-up as opposed to a competitive rebuild. I will say, I doubt a team with those sorts of young assets would trade for such an old star (even one the caliber of Paul, who I agree is incredible), unless they feel Paul legitimately turns them into a contender (probably not if they're tossing out lotto picks). Of course, you don't have to trade him, but it might do him a solid. Good luck on the next offseason then, I'm a CP3 fan.
Lindecision
Banned User
Posts: 1,363
And1: 151
Joined: Jul 20, 2012

Re: Re: Re: 

Post#1463 » by Lindecision » Mon Jul 6, 2015 12:22 am

og15 wrote:
Lindecision wrote:
kylem4711 wrote:I love Adams. I don't see anyway they let him go though.


The only way I see Adams being dealt to LA is if the trade involves Blake and Russ.

I'm assuming you mean Paul, not Blake


No, I meant Blake Griffin for Russell Westbrook and Steven Adams.

They're best friends remember, so DJ leaving for Dallas is a HUUUGE sign that Blake won't stay beyond his current deal. The threat of Blake going back home to OKC was always going to be there anyway, but now with DJ leaving its almost inevitable in my opinion.

Whereas with Chris I think he's made his bed a little and there's a much higher chance he'd want to stay beyond his current deal. Depends how things play out of course (regular season, playoffs, free agency, etc), but we can max him out again in his 30's when no one else will.
Lindecision
Banned User
Posts: 1,363
And1: 151
Joined: Jul 20, 2012

Re: Re: Trade Idea Thread II 

Post#1464 » by Lindecision » Mon Jul 6, 2015 12:24 am

DowNY wrote:Knicks could offer you guys Melo + Robin Lopez + Calderon or Afflalo sometime this upcoming season for Blake & Crawford. Helps you guys win-now while we continue to rebuild. We all know CP3 is extra close to Melo. Doc is familiar with Melo also from the Celtics-Knicks wars. Mike Woodson calls Melo the best player he ever coached. Lopez fills Center slot well for you guys also.


If things go south I'd consider it.
nickhx2
RealGM
Posts: 10,576
And1: 6,476
Joined: Feb 13, 2014

Re: Re: Re: 

Post#1465 » by nickhx2 » Mon Jul 6, 2015 12:29 am

Lindecision wrote:
og15 wrote:
Lindecision wrote:
The only way I see Adams being dealt to LA is if the trade involves Blake and Russ.

I'm assuming you mean Paul, not Blake


No, I meant Blake Griffin for Russell Westbrook and Steven Adams.

They're best friends remember, so DJ leaving for Dallas is a HUUUGE sign that Blake won't stay beyond his current deal. The threat of Blake going back home to OKC was always going to be there anyway, but now with DJ leaving its almost inevitable in my opinion.

Whereas with Chris I think he's made his bed a little and there's a much higher chance he'd want to stay beyond his current deal. Depends how things play out of course (regular season, playoffs, free agency, etc), but we can max him out again in his 30's when no one else will.


it's a threat and a new worry but it's not a sign that he actually will do anything.
Lindecision
Banned User
Posts: 1,363
And1: 151
Joined: Jul 20, 2012

Re: Re: Re: Re: 

Post#1466 » by Lindecision » Mon Jul 6, 2015 1:11 am

nickhx2 wrote:
Lindecision wrote:
og15 wrote:I'm assuming you mean Paul, not Blake


No, I meant Blake Griffin for Russell Westbrook and Steven Adams.

They're best friends remember, so DJ leaving for Dallas is a HUUUGE sign that Blake won't stay beyond his current deal. The threat of Blake going back home to OKC was always going to be there anyway, but now with DJ leaving its almost inevitable in my opinion.

Whereas with Chris I think he's made his bed a little and there's a much higher chance he'd want to stay beyond his current deal. Depends how things play out of course (regular season, playoffs, free agency, etc), but we can max him out again in his 30's when no one else will.


it's a threat and a new worry but it's not a sign that he actually will do anything.


Dude its such an obvious sign. With bright red flags.

And F*** now Bass is gone.
og15
Forum Mod - Clippers
Forum Mod - Clippers
Posts: 51,041
And1: 33,865
Joined: Jun 23, 2004
Location: NBA Fan
 

Re: Trade Idea Thread II 

Post#1467 » by og15 » Mon Jul 6, 2015 1:15 am

We had no chance at Bass as Boston with Thomas has no interest in Jamal, nothing to be mad about. We have $2.2 million and the minimum, a lot of players will be gone
nickhx2
RealGM
Posts: 10,576
And1: 6,476
Joined: Feb 13, 2014

Re: Re: Re: Re: 

Post#1468 » by nickhx2 » Mon Jul 6, 2015 1:28 am

Lindecision wrote:
nickhx2 wrote:
Lindecision wrote:
No, I meant Blake Griffin for Russell Westbrook and Steven Adams.

They're best friends remember, so DJ leaving for Dallas is a HUUUGE sign that Blake won't stay beyond his current deal. The threat of Blake going back home to OKC was always going to be there anyway, but now with DJ leaving its almost inevitable in my opinion.

Whereas with Chris I think he's made his bed a little and there's a much higher chance he'd want to stay beyond his current deal. Depends how things play out of course (regular season, playoffs, free agency, etc), but we can max him out again in his 30's when no one else will.


it's a threat and a new worry but it's not a sign that he actually will do anything.


Dude its such an obvious sign. With bright red flags.

And F*** now Bass is gone.


do you always speak in absolutes? how do you know blake doesn't feel completely betrayed right now? how do you know that he wants vindication with LA to show how wrong dj was?

i even said as much in another post: i have concerns that DJ left because blake intimated to him in privacy that he would rather leave than re-up to play with cp3.

but blake hasn't said anything. we can't read blake's mind, we have no idea what is going on. i get cynicism. but there isn't really any place for absolute statements when we don't know better.
Lindecision
Banned User
Posts: 1,363
And1: 151
Joined: Jul 20, 2012

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 

Post#1469 » by Lindecision » Mon Jul 6, 2015 5:38 am

og15 wrote:We had no chance at Bass as Boston with Thomas has no interest in Jamal, nothing to be mad about. We have $2.2 million and the minimum, a lot of players will be gone


We could've offered him the full MLE after a Peirce S&T for Jamal.

I don't know, maybe that wasn't enough for Bass.

nickhx2 wrote:
Lindecision wrote:
nickhx2 wrote:
it's a threat and a new worry but it's not a sign that he actually will do anything.


Dude its such an obvious sign. With bright red flags.

And F*** now Bass is gone.


do you always speak in absolutes? how do you know blake doesn't feel completely betrayed right now? how do you know that he wants vindication with LA to show how wrong dj was?

i even said as much in another post: i have concerns that DJ left because blake intimated to him in privacy that he would rather leave than re-up to play with cp3.

but blake hasn't said anything. we can't read blake's mind, we have no idea what is going on. i get cynicism. but there isn't really any place for absolute statements when we don't know better.


If I'm sure about something, then of course I'm going to be more absolute about what I say. Blake doesn't need to say anything. Its common sense when Blake and DJ are both smart guys and the best of friends. They're probably sick of being on a team that's irrationally hated so much in all honesty. I most certainly would.

Your second paragraph is exactly what I fear and suspect. One more year and its probably in our best intetests to trade him unfortunately. Don't even mention KD cause he's going home to DC. But if Westbrook likes the idea of coming home to LA and re-signing as a Clipper long-term next to Chris, then we gotta do it.
nickhx2
RealGM
Posts: 10,576
And1: 6,476
Joined: Feb 13, 2014

Re: Trade Idea Thread II 

Post#1470 » by nickhx2 » Mon Jul 6, 2015 6:04 am

well if you're so absolute i guess there isn't much to talk about, is there
Forte IV
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,379
And1: 6,500
Joined: Jun 12, 2008
   

Re: Trade Idea Thread II 

Post#1471 » by Forte IV » Mon Jul 6, 2015 6:10 am

I'm actually a little surprised we can't find a trade partner for Crawford to at least dump his contract. Unless I'm missing something we would have $7 mil which we could have used to sign a Bass or a Biyombo or even a Koufos.
If the Clippers win the championship next year I'm getting banned from RealGM
User avatar
mttwlsn16
Head Coach
Posts: 7,090
And1: 1,983
Joined: Jan 30, 2012
Location: Charlotte
     

Re: Trade Idea Thread II 

Post#1472 » by mttwlsn16 » Mon Jul 6, 2015 6:20 am

Forte IV wrote:I'm actually a little surprised we can't find a trade partner for Crawford to at least dump his contract. Unless I'm missing something we would have $7 mil which we could have used to sign a Bass or a Biyombo or even a Koufos.


Bass (Flakers), Biyombo (Raptors), and Koufos (Kings) have all already signed elsewhere.
Image
Forte IV
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,379
And1: 6,500
Joined: Jun 12, 2008
   

Re: Trade Idea Thread II 

Post#1473 » by Forte IV » Mon Jul 6, 2015 6:25 am

mttwlsn16 wrote:
Forte IV wrote:I'm actually a little surprised we can't find a trade partner for Crawford to at least dump his contract. Unless I'm missing something we would have $7 mil which we could have used to sign a Bass or a Biyombo or even a Koufos.


Bass (Flakers), Biyombo (Raptors), and Koufos (Kings) have all already signed elsewhere.


Yeah I know they have. I was just saying we could have signed them with $7 mil in cap space compared to the just $2 mil.
If the Clippers win the championship next year I'm getting banned from RealGM
og15
Forum Mod - Clippers
Forum Mod - Clippers
Posts: 51,041
And1: 33,865
Joined: Jun 23, 2004
Location: NBA Fan
 

Re: Trade Idea Thread II 

Post#1474 » by og15 » Mon Jul 6, 2015 6:46 am

Lindecision wrote:
og15 wrote:We had no chance at Bass as Boston with Thomas has no interest in Jamal, nothing to be mad about. We have $2.2 million and the minimum, a lot of players will be gone


We could've offered him the full MLE after a Peirce S&T for Jamal.

I don't know, maybe that wasn't enough for Bass.

If a Pierce sign and trade was possible, would have been done by now so that the Clippers would have the full MLE. Doesn't seem like Washington is interested in Jamal

Forte IV wrote:I'm actually a little surprised we can't find a trade partner for Crawford to at least dump his contract. Unless I'm missing something we would have $7 mil which we could have used to sign a Bass or a Biyombo or even a Koufos.

The $2 million that the Clippers have is the remaining MLE, it isn't cap space, team is over the cap, dumping Jamal wouldn't give $7 million in cap space
wassuphomeboy
Junior
Posts: 457
And1: 236
Joined: Dec 08, 2012
   

Re: Trade Idea Thread II 

Post#1475 » by wassuphomeboy » Mon Jul 6, 2015 7:09 am

Anyone else think Jeff Withey could be a decent option? Obviously at backup C, but he was a Final Four player in college(maybe multiple Final Fours), could bring a ton on rebounding and defense, and shouldn't cost too much either. iI would still only be his 3rd year in the league. There was a huge logjam in front of him in New Orleans with the Brow, Asik, Ajinca, Ryan Anderson, among others, while we currently don't even have one center signed lol
I root for players always, organizations sometimes.

I don't know how I'm ever going to forgive the Clippers' new front office.
Lindecision
Banned User
Posts: 1,363
And1: 151
Joined: Jul 20, 2012

Re: Re: Trade Idea Thread II 

Post#1476 » by Lindecision » Mon Jul 6, 2015 7:56 am

og15 wrote:
Lindecision wrote:
og15 wrote:We had no chance at Bass as Boston with Thomas has no interest in Jamal, nothing to be mad about. We have $2.2 million and the minimum, a lot of players will be gone


We could've offered him the full MLE after a Peirce S&T for Jamal.

I don't know, maybe that wasn't enough for Bass.

If a Pierce sign and trade was possible, would have been done by now so that the Clippers would have the full MLE. Doesn't seem like Washington is interested in Jamal


That's true. Jamal will be wanted by someone, just not DC. Depending on what's out there it might even be better to just keep him.

If we get that $19M TPE from DJ/Dallas then it could be done that way I guess, as Jamal wouldn't have to be involved. But all the better FAs will be gone by that point and the best avenue to improve will be to trade guys into the TPE. Then split the MLE between 2 rotation guys. That's IF we get the TPE.
Method28
Junior
Posts: 499
And1: 356
Joined: Feb 17, 2012

Re: Re: Trade Idea Thread II 

Post#1477 » by Method28 » Mon Jul 6, 2015 8:45 am

Lindecision wrote:
og15 wrote:
Lindecision wrote:
We could've offered him the full MLE after a Peirce S&T for Jamal.

I don't know, maybe that wasn't enough for Bass.

If a Pierce sign and trade was possible, would have been done by now so that the Clippers would have the full MLE. Doesn't seem like Washington is interested in Jamal


That's true. Jamal will be wanted by someone, just not DC. Depending on what's out there it might even be better to just keep him.

If we get that $19M TPE from DJ/Dallas then it could be done that way I guess, as Jamal wouldn't have to be involved. But all the better FAs will be gone by that point and the best avenue to improve will be to trade guys into the TPE. Then split the MLE between 2 rotation guys. That's IF we get the TPE.

Why would we be receiving a TPE?
Lindecision
Banned User
Posts: 1,363
And1: 151
Joined: Jul 20, 2012

Re: Re: Trade Idea Thread II 

Post#1478 » by Lindecision » Mon Jul 6, 2015 9:21 am

Method28 wrote:
Lindecision wrote:
og15 wrote:If a Pierce sign and trade was possible, would have been done by now so that the Clippers would have the full MLE. Doesn't seem like Washington is interested in Jamal


That's true. Jamal will be wanted by someone, just not DC. Depending on what's out there it might even be better to just keep him.

If we get that $19M TPE from DJ/Dallas then it could be done that way I guess, as Jamal wouldn't have to be involved. But all the better FAs will be gone by that point and the best avenue to improve will be to trade guys into the TPE. Then split the MLE between 2 rotation guys. That's IF we get the TPE.

Why would we be receiving a TPE?


via S&T with Dallas recieving an asset
No-Man
RealGM
Posts: 14,879
And1: 3,480
Joined: Feb 11, 2012

Re: Trade Idea Thread II 

Post#1479 » by No-Man » Mon Jul 6, 2015 11:41 am

Trade Jamal for Séraphin S&T, the Wizards have only Sessions, Temple and Neal at the backcourt, they need a guy like Jamal.
User avatar
QRich3
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 5,844
And1: 3,947
Joined: Apr 03, 2011
 

Re: Trade Idea Thread II 

Post#1480 » by QRich3 » Mon Jul 6, 2015 11:53 am

If the Wizards were interested in having Jamal, it'd been done long ago, in a S&T for Pierce probably. Sadly, I'm not sure there's any market for Jamal in today's NBA.

Return to Los Angeles Clippers