RKL wrote:nickhx2 wrote:15 for jj is a bargain
If Austin Rivers is worth 11 million to Doc/Ballmer, he might as well ask for 20 million.
edit
Lou Will and two 2nd's for JJ
How about Austin Rivers for D'Angelo Russell & Brandon Ingram?
RKL wrote:nickhx2 wrote:15 for jj is a bargain
If Austin Rivers is worth 11 million to Doc/Ballmer, he might as well ask for 20 million.
edit
Lou Will and two 2nd's for JJ
ejftw wrote:RKL wrote:nickhx2 wrote:15 for jj is a bargain
If Austin Rivers is worth 11 million to Doc/Ballmer, he might as well ask for 20 million.
edit
Lou Will and two 2nd's for JJ
How about Austin Rivers for D'Angelo Russell & Brandon Ingram?
nickhx2 wrote:crazy talk indeed, friend
Roscoe Sheed wrote:I like JJ, but he is ideally a 6th man. He is too short and athletically challenged against good teams with long and athletic wings. The problem is that Crawford and rivers have been signed to extensions. One of the two should be traded. I think Felton is a far superior point guard as compared with rivers. He should run the point off the bench
Roscoe Sheed wrote:I like JJ, but he is ideally a 6th man. He is too short and athletically challenged against good teams with long and athletic wings. The problem is that Crawford and rivers have been signed to extensions. One of the two should be traded. I think Felton is a far superior point guard as compared with rivers. He should run the point off the bench
QRich3 wrote:Yeah, Jamal's still really good at scoring in isolation, he was the 5th most efficient last year among players with at least 100 such possessions, right between Lillard and Durant. The problem is, even for the best in the league, isolations are still not very efficient possessions. So it's great to have a guy like that for broken plays to bail you out, but the problem, as we know, is when he takes too many of those possessions instead of deferring to say, let the best playmaker in the game and the best roll man in the league run a much more efficient pick'n'roll. If he was ready to be a role player and not bite more than he can chew, he'd be a really valuable piece to have, even with his bad defense. But we know he's never gonna be that.
nickhx2 wrote:it's good to have realism when discussing jamal crawford.
not sure how much longer i can stomach people thinking he can stop doing crappy things like shooting too much, and doing more things like catch and shoot at this stage of the game.
Neddy wrote:QRich3 wrote:Yeah, Jamal's still really good at scoring in isolation, he was the 5th most efficient last year among players with at least 100 such possessions, right between Lillard and Durant. The problem is, even for the best in the league, isolations are still not very efficient possessions. So it's great to have a guy like that for broken plays to bail you out, but the problem, as we know, is when he takes too many of those possessions instead of deferring to say, let the best playmaker in the game and the best roll man in the league run a much more efficient pick'n'roll. If he was ready to be a role player and not bite more than he can chew, he'd be a really valuable piece to have, even with his bad defense. But we know he's never gonna be that.
whenever he is on the floor, it is obvious that we need the ball out of his hands until the clock in in a single digit. thus I advocate for Felton to be our primary backup PG and not Austin.
Return to Los Angeles Clippers