Trade Idea Thread II
Re: Trade Idea Thread II
- PG3
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,045
- And1: 6
- Joined: Jul 05, 2005
- Location: Carson, California
Re: Trade Idea Thread II
Hey guys, here's my trade idea.
Clippers trade
Mo Williams
Ryan Gomes
Magic trade
Glen Davis
Jason Richardson
resign Nick Young with the MLE
sign a backup big man (Pryzbilla)
maybe bring back Chauncey 1 more year.
PG. Chris Paul/Eric Bledsoe/Chauncey Billups
SG. Jason Richardson/Travis Leslie
SF. Caron Butler/Tracy McGrady
PF. Blake Griffin/Glen Davis/Trey Thompkins
C. Deandre Jordan/Joel Pryzbilla
Clippers trade
Mo Williams
Ryan Gomes
Magic trade
Glen Davis
Jason Richardson
resign Nick Young with the MLE
sign a backup big man (Pryzbilla)
maybe bring back Chauncey 1 more year.
PG. Chris Paul/Eric Bledsoe/Chauncey Billups
SG. Jason Richardson/Travis Leslie
SF. Caron Butler/Tracy McGrady
PF. Blake Griffin/Glen Davis/Trey Thompkins
C. Deandre Jordan/Joel Pryzbilla
PSN: Redstar231
Re: Trade Idea Thread II
-
mkwest
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 26,910
- And1: 5,728
- Joined: Dec 18, 2005
-
Re: Trade Idea Thread II
PG3 wrote:Hey guys, here's my trade idea.
Clippers trade
Mo Williams
Ryan Gomes
Magic trade
Glen Davis
Jason Richardson
resign Nick Young with the MLE
sign a backup big man (Pryzbilla)
maybe bring back Chauncey 1 more year.
PG. Chris Paul/Eric Bledsoe/Chauncey Billups
SG. Jason Richardson/Travis Leslie
SF. Caron Butler/Tracy McGrady
PF. Blake Griffin/Glen Davis/Trey Thompkins
C. Deandre Jordan/Joel Pryzbilla
I'm going to tell you why you don't want to do that. Orlando has $22.9M in guaranteed salary on the books in the summer of 2013 (after waiving partially guaranteed contracts of Turkoglu & Duhon). That's not including roster charges, this years 1st rounder or next year's 1st. Let's say that they'll be at $28.8M with those taken into consideration. If the salary cap is at $63M, they are ~$34.2M under the cap. That's already enough to convince a max free-agent to join Howard if they decide roll the dice and not to trade Howard this season.
If we make this trade and they add no long term guaranteed salary between now and then, they would have $45.8M in cap space next summer. That would be enough to re-sign Howard, entice a player like CP3 to jump ship and still have enough to sign a decent 3rd wheel.
Re: Trade Idea Thread II
-
og15
- Forum Mod - Clippers

- Posts: 51,233
- And1: 34,062
- Joined: Jun 23, 2004
- Location: NBA Fan
-
Re: Trade Idea Thread II
It's just a lose situation for the Clippers. It's those kind of moves that get teams stuck with nowhere to go. Signing or trading for non impact players that will make you better, but not significantly, and won't take you over the top. I believe the team would also be getting into luxury tax level if re-signing Paul and extending Blake after those moves
Re: Trade Idea Thread II
- Sofia
- GOTB: Mean Girls
- Posts: 30,469
- And1: 34,333
- Joined: Aug 03, 2008
Re: Trade Idea Thread II
Thoughts on getting Hickson through s+t, maybe for Mo?
President of the Pharmcat Fanclub
President of the GreatWhiteStiff Fanclub
Free OKCFanSinceSGA
Reddyplayerone = my RealGM bae
President of the GreatWhiteStiff Fanclub
Free OKCFanSinceSGA
Reddyplayerone = my RealGM bae
Re: Trade Idea Thread II
-
og15
- Forum Mod - Clippers

- Posts: 51,233
- And1: 34,062
- Joined: Jun 23, 2004
- Location: NBA Fan
-
Re: Trade Idea Thread II
Not enough range, not a good defender, cant play C, so he doesn't really fill a role for the team. It would be like getting a poor mans Blake.
Re: Trade Idea Thread II
-
mike3
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,976
- And1: 120
- Joined: Sep 27, 2009
Re: Trade Idea Thread II
The most important thing this offseason imo is making a move to solve our SF issue. I love Caron Butler but he's not the player he used to be, I can't see him putting up starters numbers even though he played well last season. I'm not sure if hes that type of veteran to demand a starting role and upset with anything less but I would love to see us pull a move (maybe a trade with mo, gomes etc for a solid Small Forward) and have Butler off the bench. When he gets hot hes great and off the bench we will get a huge spark when he does and when he cools off or gets tired its not gonna matter because he's the backup SF.
I just dont want to see us with another situation where we've got a huge whole at SF the whole season. We could do a lot worse than Butler but we could also do a lot better than relying on him too much.
I just dont want to see us with another situation where we've got a huge whole at SF the whole season. We could do a lot worse than Butler but we could also do a lot better than relying on him too much.
Re: Trade Idea Thread II
-
Keatonsays
- Ballboy
- Posts: 3
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jun 07, 2012
Re: Trade Idea Thread II
I think Clipper fans are far too quick to throw Caron Butler under the bus. He did struggle offensively for long stretches, but you have to remember that our team had no system in place and were basically forced to rely on natural talent to score. With a full training camp to get a system in place, you can expect better play from all of our players. Caron should get a lot more open looks from coming off screens and having plays actually run for him, rather than him just having the ball and having to do whatever he can with it. In addition, he played very good defense for us over this past season, and there's no better example of that than his work on Rudy Gay in the playoffs. The only good game Rudy Gay had all series, was the one where Caron had to sit out due to a broken hand, which he played with for the rest of the series. You don't trade good character guys like that, who bring that level of toughness to your team, unless you're bringing in a bonafide star. We could bring in somebody who we Think will be a better fit, but could struggle just as much if not worse than Caron has, so trading Caron should be more of a last resort, rather than a first option. Unless we're trading for guys like Rudy Gay, Luol Deng or Andre Igoudala, we should stick to what we know for the most part and work with what we already have. We should be focusing on finding suitable role players right now, not moving any of our starters.
Re: Trade Idea Thread II
- madmaxmedia
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,589
- And1: 7,511
- Joined: Jun 22, 2001
- Location: SoCal
-
Re: Trade Idea Thread II
I agree, I don't think the Clippers should go out to try to dump Caron's salary.
If there's a trade for something we want then fine. But I think Caron will be contributor next year. He does a better job justifying his salary (at this point) than DeAndre.
If there's a trade for something we want then fine. But I think Caron will be contributor next year. He does a better job justifying his salary (at this point) than DeAndre.
Re: Trade Idea Thread II
-
TheNewEra
- RealGM
- Posts: 28,955
- And1: 10,696
- Joined: Aug 28, 2008
- Location: Lob City
-
Re: Trade Idea Thread II
Jordan had a better season than Butler as far as impact goes and production
Re: Trade Idea Thread II
- ClipperEric
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,065
- And1: 5
- Joined: Jan 03, 2008
- Location: Long Beach
Re: Trade Idea Thread II
We need a lot more beef down low. DJ's dunks may be exciting but he's not a championship type Center. Despite his block shots, he's actually really bad defensively and a huge liability at the end of games. There's a reason we went with Reggie Evans an KMart throughout the playoffs.
DJ
Caron Butler
Filler (Gomes)
for
Okafor
Ariza
Then we have to resign Reggie Evans. KMart is probably going to leave.
DJ
Caron Butler
Filler (Gomes)
for
Okafor
Ariza
Then we have to resign Reggie Evans. KMart is probably going to leave.
Re: Trade Idea Thread II
- adiedanny
- Senior
- Posts: 721
- And1: 5
- Joined: Jul 07, 2006
- Location: Covina,Ca
Re: Trade Idea Thread II
ClipperEric wrote:We need a lot more beef down low. DJ's dunks may be exciting but he's not a championship type Center. Despite his block shots, he's actually really bad defensively and a huge liability at the end of games. There's a reason we went with Reggie Evans an KMart throughout the playoffs.
DJ
Caron Butler
Filler (Gomes)
for
Okafor
Ariza
Then we have to resign Reggie Evans. KMart is probably going to leave.
I beg to differ. What championship Center does miami have, Dallas had last year, and so on and so on? Honestly look at your championship teams of the past? The star Center formula for a championship has not been necessary for a long time. The center position is usually a role player, defender or rebounder. Dj just needs to improve his ft, jumper and defensive decisions. I think he is still the perfect compliment to Blake.
Re: Trade Idea Thread II
- Sofia
- GOTB: Mean Girls
- Posts: 30,469
- And1: 34,333
- Joined: Aug 03, 2008
Re: Trade Idea Thread II
I just posted this on Suns board.
"Assuming Childress gets bashed with the amnesty hammer, how would a Lopez s+t for Gomes ($4m exp) and a 2nd rounder or 2 work for you guys?"
Thoughts? They seem pretty low on Lopez. Big body with 6 fouls is what we need right now.
"Assuming Childress gets bashed with the amnesty hammer, how would a Lopez s+t for Gomes ($4m exp) and a 2nd rounder or 2 work for you guys?"
Thoughts? They seem pretty low on Lopez. Big body with 6 fouls is what we need right now.
President of the Pharmcat Fanclub
President of the GreatWhiteStiff Fanclub
Free OKCFanSinceSGA
Reddyplayerone = my RealGM bae
President of the GreatWhiteStiff Fanclub
Free OKCFanSinceSGA
Reddyplayerone = my RealGM bae
Re: Trade Idea Thread II
-
mike3
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,976
- And1: 120
- Joined: Sep 27, 2009
Re: Trade Idea Thread II
^^ I actually saw that Lopez is available earlier today, I think he'd be a great guy to seriously consider signing. He started for a while with Suns and if DJ doesn't improve much he might be playing equal/more mins than DJ. I'd like us to go after him. Hell go for Childress and Lopez. We would need a backup SF and C.
Re: Trade Idea Thread II
- SportsFan215
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,992
- And1: 60
- Joined: Jun 23, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: Trade Idea Thread II
I was just looking over the trade board and one trade between Memphis and Orlando got me thinking. Memphis is really low on Rudy Gay right now, because of his poor play against us in the playoffs and his contract.
I have always loved his game, and his potential. I think he would be a great 3rd star on our team with CP and Blake, especially if we don't have to give up much.
I was thinking Butler/Gomes/Bledsoe for Gay. The Griz would get an adequate replacement, an expiring, and a young emerging prospect, while I think this would elevate us to even another level than we were at last year. There were many times throughout the year that I felt we were missing that wing presence, and even though we have Crawford now, Gay would make even more of a difference. Yes his contract isn't friendly, but it's only one year longer than Butler's, but the question would be could we afford CP3 (extension assumed), Blake's new contract, DJ, and Gay is the future.
Thoughts?
I have always loved his game, and his potential. I think he would be a great 3rd star on our team with CP and Blake, especially if we don't have to give up much.
I was thinking Butler/Gomes/Bledsoe for Gay. The Griz would get an adequate replacement, an expiring, and a young emerging prospect, while I think this would elevate us to even another level than we were at last year. There were many times throughout the year that I felt we were missing that wing presence, and even though we have Crawford now, Gay would make even more of a difference. Yes his contract isn't friendly, but it's only one year longer than Butler's, but the question would be could we afford CP3 (extension assumed), Blake's new contract, DJ, and Gay is the future.
Thoughts?
Re: Trade Idea Thread II
- LOJ
- Banned User
- Posts: 5,514
- And1: 7
- Joined: Feb 03, 2011
- Location: Santo Domingo, Rep
Re: Trade Idea Thread II
I would like it, but they can get better offers for Gay. Specially from a team like the Raptors.
Re: Trade Idea Thread II
-
og15
- Forum Mod - Clippers

- Posts: 51,233
- And1: 34,062
- Joined: Jun 23, 2004
- Location: NBA Fan
-
Re: Trade Idea Thread II
Do you want to pay $16.5, $17.9 and $19.3M for Rudy Gay over the next three seasons? I sure don't. They already said that Sterling doesn't want to pay three max players in relation to Dwight being teamed up with Blake and Paul, so why would be pay a vastly inferior player?
Having Gay would give the Clippers a "big three" contract wise, but not production wise. This would mean that the roster would have to be rounded out with cheap players because Sterling isn't paying luxury.
Blake next season: $13.7M, Paul ~$18M + Gay = $49.6M
If the team traded for Gay, it basically means you are trading whomever you give up+Paul for Gay because Paul will not be re-signed (he might not want to return to such a cap situation). Paul + Blake + Rudy would be about $49.6 million of the cap taken, and increasing every year. If DJ was supposed to stay in that trade, then you would have 4 players putting you at about $61M. add Jamal Crawford, $65M. So there is a $6M gap before luxury assuming it is $71M next season.
Not happening for many reasons with the most important being that it doesn't improve the team since you would have to cut costs in other places. For example in a trade for him, you had Gomes/Butler/Bledsoe (8+4+1.7 = $13.7, +$2.8M, don't even know if the trade works money wise, but assuming it does).
The next season, to re-sign Paul and stay away from lottery, you would have to let Odom and Billups go. For this season, hope Billups is back early and you play Odom as backup SF because you still don't have on and have increased the payroll by almost $3M.
You could try to build off that next year, try to fill 7 roster spots with $6M. Add Thompkins and Leslie and it is 5 spots with $4.2M. That means time to go shopping in the second round. Trade 1st round pick to a team for two second round picks.
Paul / Cheap FA PG
Crawford / Leslie (0.9K)
Gay / 2nd Rd Pick
Blake / Thompkins (0.9K)
DJ / 2nd Rd Pick
With DJ's contract on the roster, no other high priced player can be added to Blake and Paul while having an owner that isn't going to pay luxury. Even in the above scenario, as they get their yearly raises, the team will go to luxury. Or you try to trade Crawford, then start Leslia? at SG. Worst bench in the NBA.
Having Gay would give the Clippers a "big three" contract wise, but not production wise. This would mean that the roster would have to be rounded out with cheap players because Sterling isn't paying luxury.
Blake next season: $13.7M, Paul ~$18M + Gay = $49.6M
If the team traded for Gay, it basically means you are trading whomever you give up+Paul for Gay because Paul will not be re-signed (he might not want to return to such a cap situation). Paul + Blake + Rudy would be about $49.6 million of the cap taken, and increasing every year. If DJ was supposed to stay in that trade, then you would have 4 players putting you at about $61M. add Jamal Crawford, $65M. So there is a $6M gap before luxury assuming it is $71M next season.
Not happening for many reasons with the most important being that it doesn't improve the team since you would have to cut costs in other places. For example in a trade for him, you had Gomes/Butler/Bledsoe (8+4+1.7 = $13.7, +$2.8M, don't even know if the trade works money wise, but assuming it does).
The next season, to re-sign Paul and stay away from lottery, you would have to let Odom and Billups go. For this season, hope Billups is back early and you play Odom as backup SF because you still don't have on and have increased the payroll by almost $3M.
You could try to build off that next year, try to fill 7 roster spots with $6M. Add Thompkins and Leslie and it is 5 spots with $4.2M. That means time to go shopping in the second round. Trade 1st round pick to a team for two second round picks.
Paul / Cheap FA PG
Crawford / Leslie (0.9K)
Gay / 2nd Rd Pick
Blake / Thompkins (0.9K)
DJ / 2nd Rd Pick
With DJ's contract on the roster, no other high priced player can be added to Blake and Paul while having an owner that isn't going to pay luxury. Even in the above scenario, as they get their yearly raises, the team will go to luxury. Or you try to trade Crawford, then start Leslia? at SG. Worst bench in the NBA.
Re: Trade Idea Thread II
- Neddy
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,865
- And1: 3,908
- Joined: Jan 28, 2012
-
Re: Trade Idea Thread II
with barnes signing and hill for 2 years, i smell a trade for caron coming soon. hope we dump his salary for a backup SF, start hill with barnes getting most backup minutes and sign darko to compete with DJ for minutes. we can really use at least 1 true low post scorer on the bench.
ehhhhh f it.
Re: Trade Idea Thread II
-
mike3
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,976
- And1: 120
- Joined: Sep 27, 2009
Re: Trade Idea Thread II
I've liked what Caron has brought to our team, his veteran leadership, playing injured in playoffs etc. Don't really agree, I'd like to see him finish his career here with Billups etc.
Re: Trade Idea Thread II
-
mkwest
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 26,910
- And1: 5,728
- Joined: Dec 18, 2005
-
Re: Trade Idea Thread II
Right now, Caron probably doesn't net more than a player with a longer/bigger contract that another team is trying to free themselves of. I think he does have trade value next season as an $8M expiring. At that point, Bledsoe will be entering the fourth season of his rookie contract and could be combined in a package with Butler to try to add a nice piece.
Like mike, I appreciate Caron's presence on the roster, but I'd move him if it improves the roster.
Like mike, I appreciate Caron's presence on the roster, but I'd move him if it improves the roster.
Re: Trade Idea Thread II
-
og15
- Forum Mod - Clippers

- Posts: 51,233
- And1: 34,062
- Joined: Jun 23, 2004
- Location: NBA Fan
-
Re: Trade Idea Thread II
I'd move Caron if there was a better player to acquire, but that is only possible if he is packaged with someone like Bledsoe as mk mentioned. Outside of that, let him expire, and I wouldn't sign him back unless it was a minimum contract as a backup.
Neddy, Darko is a terrible post scorer....
Neddy, Darko is a terrible post scorer....
Return to Los Angeles Clippers












