Trade Idea Thread II

[azncorruptedo17]

That's a lot of pieces we would have to give up, and Terrence Ross is showing some nice potential for us, while Ed is likely our future starting PF for the time being.

Ross has the potential, but not with derozan there, y'all have to ship 1 for some other pieces i think. like i said though, this is next year, maybe calderon will stay longer and things will change

[kanersen]

and 95% of raptors fans would much rather trade derozan then ross

if you think you are getting ross, ed and a first for bledsoe, i think calling that dissalusional is an understatement.

[azncorruptedo17]

and 95% of raptors fans would much rather trade derozan then ross

if you think you are getting ross, ed and a first for bledsoe, i think calling that dissalusional is an understatement.

i'd rather not get derozan, esp with cap issues, and he sucks. davis was a filler, don't really care for him.

lowry sucks and calderon is most likely walking this season

[Angel strike1]

will admit to 1 thing. bled was really injured cause his game seems back to normal now.

i still wish we could take gay at 3 but prob you guys right not worth the cap hit.

[MellowRose]

How exactly is Redick and a Magic first rounder garbage? SMDH. Redick is a great player that would complement the Clippers very very well. Get off that ****...

why don't you get off your trolling high horse? what makes you or any other trolls think we are breaking up our roster that just won 17 in a row and have the best record in the entire NBA?

fact #1 : eric bledsoe is one of the hottest, and greatest trade assets out there, peroid
fact #2 : eric has another year after this season on his rookie contract, and even after that he is a RFA. we can match any offer if we choose to
fact #3 : ask any scout right now, bledsoe >>> reddick on potential alone, then there is the size of the contract issue with reddick. we don't need that.
fact #4 : caron maybe overpaid, but his attitude and his shooting ability along with his size makes him already a great fit
fact #5 : chauncey > reddick
fact #6 : we have depth to withstand injuries, which has struck bigshot and grant hill, once they are back our roster does not even have anymore room for playing time. in fact, the proposed trade will result in zero playing time for reddick once playoff comes and we have healthy chauncey to start and our 6th man crawford to back him up.

so get your trolling behind outta our forum.


please.

Why do you love to call everyone a "troll"? Did you just learn the word "troll" and now use it whenever the hell you can? SMDH.

[Neddy]

Why do you love to call everyone a "troll"? Did you just learn the word "troll" and now use it whenever the hell you can?SMDH.

In Internet slang, a troll (pron.: /ˈtroʊl/, /ˈtrɒl/) is someone who posts inflammatory,[1] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as a forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[2] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.[3] The noun troll may also refer to the provocative message itself, as in: "That was an excellent troll you posted."
While the word troll and its associated verb trolling are associated with Internet discourse, media attention in recent years has made such labels subjective, with trolling describing intentionally provocative actions and harassment outside of an online context. For example, mass media has used troll to describe "a person who defaces Internet tribute sites with the aim of causing grief to families

therefore, you are.

[Angel strike1]

ned . you should charge him for giving vocab lessons

[Mr.Raptorsingh]

and 95% of raptors fans would much rather trade derozan then ross

if you think you are getting ross, ed and a first for bledsoe, i think calling that dissalusional is an understatement.

i'd rather not get derozan, esp with cap issues, and he sucks. davis was a filler, don't really care for him.

lowry sucks and calderon is most likely walking this season

I'd do DeRozan for Bledsoe if y'all are up for it lol. Ross, I'm not so sure about.

[azncorruptedo17]

I'd do DeRozan for Bledsoe if y'all are up for it lol. Ross, I'm not so sure about.

lol. def not. ross or bust

[Quake Griffin]

guys.


let's discuss chandler parsons.
i like this kid and i like the possible price tag he'll command when his rookie deal is up.

[azncorruptedo17]

guys.

let's discuss chandler parsons.
i like this kid and i like the possible price tag he'll command when his rookie deal is up.

1) won't happen
2) they have a great young core to work with, why break it up? they'd be stupid to do so
lin, harden, parsons, patterson, asik

the only thing i can see them doing to break it up is to get another max player, pf/c. they're not going to give out lin, houston has a huge chinese following and makes him that much more marketable in that city, so throw EB out of the question.

we have no assets for parsons, he wont' be a max but he'll def be 7-10, great role player just like hayward. hayward would be the realistic* choice

[scoobs07]

I would love Parsons on the Clippers, but yeah it is true that Hayward might be the best young shooting wing player that we could get. Maybe on draft day we could offer Bledsoe and our pick to Utah for Hayward and their pick or the Warriors pick that they own. The Warriors pick should end up being 5-10 slots higher then ours, so we could nab another good young player with that.

[og15]

and 95% of raptors fans would much rather trade derozan then ross

if you think you are getting ross, ed and a first for bledsoe, i think calling that dissalusional is an understatement.

i'd rather not get derozan, esp with cap issues, and he sucks. davis was a filler, don't really care for him.

lowry sucks and calderon is most likely walking this season

I'd do DeRozan for Bledsoe if y'all are up for it lol. Ross, I'm not so sure about.

Bledsoe is a lot better than DeRozan on both ends...

[ejftw]

Ross for Bleds would be a great deal, and I'd do it in a heartbeat, after Paul resigns.

But, realistically, I see us trading Bledsoe around draft night for a mid-level prospect and a pick around the 8-10 range. The pick will hopefully yield us our next cheap backup point, while the prospect could shore up our front line. Michael Carter-Williams is a guy I think we could realistically snatch, a 6'6 point guard dropping 9.4 dimes a game for 'Cuse. Trey Burke would be a decent choice as well, but he'll most likely be around 18-23 range, meaning Clips would want more in return.

If Sacks keeps our pick, and Jordan Adams declares and somehow drops to 28-30, he'd be a solid prospect pick-up that late. Get a solid 4/5 prospect and one of Burke/Carter-Williams in return for Bleds, and you have a cheap bench that would be deeper, assuming Barnes & Odom return and Billups/Hill give it one more go.

Carter-Williams | Green
Crawford | Adams
Barnes | Hill
Odom | Cheap FA ala Turiaf
Prospect | Cheap, Insurance FA

Doesn't look too shabby for next year as 2/3 deep.

[Neddy]

http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-cli ... vrit=53285

"I'm just preparing for that moment," Bledsoe said in his typically quiet voice. "I'm still learning behind Chris and Chauncey. Hopefully, we win a championship and if I do get that chance, I can lead a team."

doesn't sound like bledsoe has any interest staying as CP3's back up or convert to SG full time. he wants to be a PG elsewhere.

we should enjoy the ride this season and be prepared to depart with him, and hope to maximize the trade assets in return.

didn't realize hayward's rookie contract will be the same length as bledsoe. we need to look elsewhere and come away with either starting SG or a starting SF, plus a pick.

[scoobs07]

didn't realize hayward's rookie contract will be the same length as bledsoe. we need to look elsewhere and come
away with either starting SG or a starting SF, plus a pick.[/quote]Neddy, do you have anybody in mind? There isn't really a lot of good young shooters out there on good contracts. I mean, Clay Thompson would be ideal, but I'm pretty sure the Warriors are not trading him. Other players I could think of off the top of my head are Travis Lee, Chandler Parsons, Bradley Beal, man it's tough. Maybe we could go a little more expensive and look at Aaron Afflalo, OJ Mayo (sign and trade), JR Smith (sign and trade) or Nick Young (sign and trade). Players like Beal, Thompson, Lee and Parsons would have to be aquired via three way, unless they trade their starting PG somewhere else. Bledsoe+our pick to Utah for Haywood+their pick(which should be a lottery pick), I think would be good.

[scoobs07]

Another thing we could do is a three way trade such as this:

Clippers get: Danny Granger and Golden State 1st round pick

Jazz get: Eric Bledsoe and Clippers 1st round pick

Pacers get: Goron Hayward, Caron Butler and Jazz 1st round pick

-Clippers get borderline all-star SF that spreads the floor and also move up in the draft a little bit

-Jazz get their starting PG of the future that they would be willing to match and offer sheet, they also get our 1st round pick, which they would use on another good young player.

-Pacers get a 22 year shooter to be their shooting guard of the future, Butler adds depth at the wings and is a expiring. The Pacers also get a lottery pick out of this trade.

This deal, still might require some tweaking, but I just thought of this one.

[azncorruptedo17]

Another thing we could do is a three way trade such as this:

Clippers get: Danny Granger and Golden State 1st round pick

Jazz get: Eric Bledsoe and Clippers 1st round pick

Pacers get: Goron Hayward, Caron Butler and Jazz 1st round pick

-Clippers get borderline all-star SF that spreads the floor and also move up in the draft a little bit

-Jazz get their starting PG of the future that they would be willing to match and offer sheet, they also get our 1st round pick, which they would use on another good young player.

-Pacers get a 22 year shooter to be their shooting guard of the future, Butler adds depth at the wings and is a expiring. The Pacers also get a lottery pick out of this trade.

This deal, still might require some tweaking, but I just thought of this one.

i believe $$$ is still the issue. we can't really say how the trade of EB would be until next season since we're losing/gaining players in the off season + resigning CP3.

Granger still owed 14mil next year + having CP resign... we can't have 3 max players on our roster, and even if we do for next year we'd be renting out granger for the year.

I'd rather get Ross, at least he'd still be in his rookie contract

[og15]

Ross isn't good enough for me to really be behind that, and we don't know of his work ethic so I don't know how he will hone all his ability. Kidd-Gilchrist is unrealistic, but the kind of guy I would like. I wouldn't mind Hayward either.

[azncorruptedo17]

Ross isn't good enough for me to really be behind that, and we don't know of his work ethic so I don't know how he will hone all his ability. Kidd-Gilchrist is unrealistic, but the kind of guy I would like. I wouldn't mind Hayward either.

1) rookie contract
2) he's good, not a sf though. he'd need to put on about 15-20lbs of muscle
3) work ethic won't matter with cp/bg here. it's either he shapes up or he gets shipped out.

i'd take the risk on him + toronto pick.