Quake Griffin wrote:Which is why I was against the "build a little engine that could team to attract a star and when any success comes, claim you dont care about anything else that happens next/ it was all worth it because that little success was enough" from the jump. If it's not Kawhi or KD coming, I dont want it. Oh great, Klay and/ or Kyrie on max deals. Maybe a WCF trip once in the next 5 years. ZZZZzzz
Could it work? Sure.
But traditionally, stars are joining stars. Very rare they just say, "oh wow...45 wins? What a culture. I want that."
I've even made the case that there is more history of players joining "lesser" teams if they can look and see star players on the horizon....Nash-Suns...Paul-Griffin...Bron-Cryrie.
Yah, I'm with you on that, but there's a case to be made about how winning is good not only to make you attractive to FA, but it also improves everyone's value. Shai and Sham have more value because of it, Lou and Harrell as well, Gallo is now a guy you can trade without having to attach a pick to him, etc. Now maybe you don't want to trade any of those guys, but if a great opportunity arises (say AD wants to come and there's no one offering a ton), you have the liquidity to make the most of it. So you maybe lose a lot of value by not having a good pick, but you build back value in other places.
But yeah, if it was up to me, we'd be praying for luck in tonight's lottery.





















