RealGM

Bag on Hollins ALL you want, but last night proved that he plays under the radar doing anything asked of him to win games. I think Hollins gets too many fouls, a lot he doesn't deserve (especially when guys go over his back,) but he plays w/ an intensity that rubs off on his team mates. Mullins proved last night that he should be cut and that we NEED to look for better "BIG" backups to help DJ & Hollins.
I hope that everything is ok w/ the Hollins family and he should know that he was missed by at least one fan at Staples last night.

RiversideClips wrote:Bag on Hollins ALL you want, but last night proved that he plays under the radar doing anything asked of him to win games. I think Hollins gets too many fouls, a lot he doesn't deserve (especially when guys go over his back,) but he plays w/ an intensity that rubs off on his team mates. Mullins proved last night that he should be cut and that we NEED to look for better "BIG" backups to help DJ & Hollins.
I hope that everything is ok w/ the Hollins family and he should know that he was missed by at least one fan at Staples last night.

Two fans. I totally agree with you

Agree as well he had a strong composed game and think he should probably be considered to play some with DJ when we need D and length up front. Hope he can return and be productive while limiting fouls.

Not a Hollins fan in the slightest, he is a fouling machine and shouldn't be the first big off the bench for a team of the Clippers quality. That said I will give him credit for never half assing a single play, and for usually making the right rotations on D, her certainly earns the money that he makes.

Besides the fouling I don't have a problem with Hollins. He at least has some athleticism and puts in good effort. Mullens on the other hand couldn't guard to save his life. I agree that a player like Hollins shouldn't be the first big off the bench, but we really don't have many other options right now. And hey, he's at least 7 feet tall.

thanumba2clippersfan wrote:Besides the fouling I don't have a problem with Hollins. He at least has some athleticism and puts in good effort. Mullens on the other hand couldn't guard to save his life. I agree that a player like Hollins shouldn't be the first big off the bench, but we really don't have many other options right now. And hey, he's at least 7 feet tall.

If anything Mullens hurts us more than helps us when he is in the rotation.

adiedanny wrote:

thanumba2clippersfan wrote:Besides the fouling I don't have a problem with Hollins. He at least has some athleticism and puts in good effort. Mullens on the other hand couldn't guard to save his life. I agree that a player like Hollins shouldn't be the first big off the bench, but we really don't have many other options right now. And hey, he's at least 7 feet tall.

If anything Mullens hurts us more than helps us when he is in the rotation.

what a waste of a jock strap.

I hate Mullens. Garbage player. He looks slow too

We dont need better backup bigs to help DJ and Hollins, we need better backup bigs that can completely eliminate Hollins+Mully from the rotation.

Chronz wrote:We dont need better backup bigs to help DJ and Hollins, we need better backup bigs that can completely eliminate Hollins+Mully from the rotation.

i think that's the plan.