QRich3 wrote:...saying Doc is "stuck in the old age" when it comes to analytics is just uninformed and seems to be following an agenda.
The agenda word itself is valid. Doc goes after...
1. Players who have played for him before, especially in his 2008 Celtics championship team (Glen Davis, Lestor Hudson, Nate Robinson, and the inevitable Big 3 member Paul Pierce)
2. Players who have defeated his Big 3 Celtics from 2007-2012 (J.J. Redick, Hedo Turkoglu, Jordan Farmar, Sasha Vujacic, Byron Mullens, Dahntay Jones)
3. People who have worked for him before (Lawrence Frank, Sam Cassell)
The trade for his son Austin was the kicker.
Doc has a favorites problem. Going after guys who have defeated him makes it seem as if Doc wants some payback from those players. That's jealousy and pettiness. He lets his emotions get in the way of business.
Onto Crawford. Here are his Prevention stats for the playoffs:
Round 1 - 0.86 shots/2.14 PTS, 0.18 POSS, 0.29 AST, 0.71 set-ups, 0.14 delays, 0.29 helps
Round 2 - 1.57 shots/3.57 PTS, 1.00 POSS, 0.71 AST, 0.14 screens, 1.14 set-ups, 0.29 saves, 0.14 delays, 0.29 helps
Now look at his bench opponent's Preventions:
Manu Ginobili - 2.43 shots/5.57 PTS, 0.43 POSS, 0.43 AST, 0.29 screens, 0.86 set-ups, 0.43 saves, 1.00 delays, 0.14 helps
Marco Belinelli - 0.57 shots/1.57 PTS, 0.62 POSS, 0.14 AST, 0.43 set-ups, 0.14 saves, 0.14 delays, 0.86 helps
Corey Brewer - 1.71 shots/4.71 PTS, 0.95 POSS, 0.29 AST, 0.14 screens, 0.43 set-ups, 0.43 saves, 0.43 delays, 0.57 helps
Josh Smith - 2.14 shots/4.43 PTS, 1.21 POSS, 0.29 AST, 2.36 screens, 1.29 set-ups, 0.14 saves, 1.00 delays, 0.86 helps
If you combined the bench players together and Crawford's rounds together, you will see that the bench beats Crawford by quite a good margin. Crawford's second round numbers are considered inflated because two of their wins were blow outs (he was basically contesting garbage shots in those games). The players above Crawford are solid rotation guys who knew when, where and who to contest.
These stats come from re-watching the game completely, with (hopefully high quality) frame advancing. We all knew Crawford being a defensive sieve was an indicator; these above stats confirm the eye test.