Page 1 of 2

Game 64: Los Angeles (41-22) vs New York (27-39)

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 3:44 am
by mkwest
Image

Re: Game 64: Los Angeles (41-22) vs New York (27-39)

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 3:53 am
by mkwest
A little OT, but big game by Lance tonight.

Re: Game 64: Los Angeles (41-22) vs New York (27-39)

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 4:00 am
by nickhx2
lance :(

Lance & Matty B.

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 4:01 am
by Ranma
[tweet]https://twitter.com/FlyByKnite/status/708502449200324609[/tweet]

Re: Game 64: Los Angeles (41-22) vs New York (27-39)

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 4:02 am
by nickhx2
screw this jeff green

i want that other j green

Re: Game 64: Los Angeles (41-22) vs New York (27-39)

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 4:10 am
by LACtdom
Silently hoping Austin breaks his hand again.

Re: Game 64: Los Angeles (41-22) vs New York (27-39)

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 4:10 am
by nickhx2
jesus christ, dj

Re: Game 64: Los Angeles (41-22) vs New York (27-39)

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 4:11 am
by mkwest
[tweet]https://twitter.com/ESPNLosAngeles/status/708389598221586432[/tweet]

Prior to tonight, the last time he missed a field goal attempt against the Knicks was 1/17/14.

Re: Game 64: Los Angeles (41-22) vs New York (27-39)

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 4:12 am
by LACtdom
nickhx2 wrote:screw this jeff green

i want that other j green

JaMychal Green has been playing great but it's crazy if you don't realise how good Jeff has been for us. Should we have kept Lance? Yes, but Green is by far one of our better players.

Re: Game 64: Los Angeles (41-22) vs New York (27-39)

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 4:16 am
by nickhx2
he hasn't been as good as you think. but if by good you mean better than our toilet scum of a bench then yes i would say he has been good.

key words being "better than our toilet scum of a bench"

Re: Game 64: Los Angeles (41-22) vs New York (27-39)

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 5:10 am
by mkwest
Nice move by DJ.

Re: Game 64: Los Angeles (41-22) vs New York (27-39)

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 5:10 am
by nickhx2
nice move by dj

Re: Game 64: Los Angeles (41-22) vs New York (27-39)

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 5:13 am
by nickhx2
omg intercepted again by a mod

Jinx!

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 5:13 am
by Ranma
mkwest wrote:Nice move by DJ.
nickhx2 wrote:nice move by dj

Re: Game 64: Los Angeles (41-22) vs New York (27-39)

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 5:38 am
by Quake Griffin
smfh

why aren't we blowing this team out?

No Killer Instinct

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 5:44 am
by Ranma
The only reason we're even leading is because the Knicks are missing opportunities. The Thunder even lost tonight.

Lucky Clippers

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 5:52 am
by Wammy Giveaway
The Scare Mode is in effect. Every time the Clippers have had a one-point lead in the 3rd and 4th quarters, they always respond with a make. The Knicks, however, have missed their shots every time they've cut the lead to one. It is the fear of a lead-changing shot that could put the Clippers in a deficit which always gets them going.

Re: Game 64: Los Angeles (41-22) vs New York (27-39)

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 5:52 am
by nickhx2
jj hits 3

does air bump with crawford

does air bump with austin who doesn't air bump back


jj flies through air awkwardly by himself

Re: Game 64: Los Angeles (41-22) vs New York (27-39)

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 5:53 am
by Quake Griffin
thank God for Porzingas missing bunny after bunny.

Thank you JJ.
just needed a W to gain a game on those Thunder.

Re: Game 64: Los Angeles (41-22) vs New York (27-39)

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 6:03 am
by sushibear
Thank god you guys pulled through. I was worried when jamal and Austin was out there bricking. Tankforthibs