Wammy Giveaway wrote:As long as Doc Rivers is still on the team, the Clippers are stuck with the "bad franchise" label.
or not
https://clipperholics.com/2019/01/11/jimmy-butler-wants-to-team-up-with-kawhi-on-the-clippers/
Wammy Giveaway wrote:As long as Doc Rivers is still on the team, the Clippers are stuck with the "bad franchise" label.
esqtvd wrote:TheNewEra wrote:Starters need to change enough wasting time already.
-Beverly and Bradley is a no go
-We tried Boban over Gortat
-We are not going to bench Harris or Gallonari
Hmmmm so who’s the ex factor for change?
you can put Beverley in for Avery but that might not be much of a difference
and the Beverley-Lou combo is keeping us in games
you can try Wallace but his lack of a shot over 10 feet will destroy the spacing
it's not that Avery's good it's that the alternatives are not appealing either
TheNewEra wrote:esqtvd wrote:TheNewEra wrote:Starters need to change enough wasting time already.
-Beverly and Bradley is a no go
-We tried Boban over Gortat
-We are not going to bench Harris or Gallonari
Hmmmm so who’s the ex factor for change?
you can put Beverley in for Avery but that might not be much of a difference
and the Beverley-Lou combo is keeping us in games
you can try Wallace but his lack of a shot over 10 feet will destroy the spacing
it's not that Avery's good it's that the alternatives are not appealing either
Then sit Bradley a few games and play a shooter like Milo or Jerome with Williams and Wallace. It’s not time for more excuses for these slow starts we have enough depth to stop sitting on our hands doing nothing.
We’ve done everything else but give DNPs to our worse offensive player.
esqtvd wrote:TheNewEra wrote:esqtvd wrote:
you can put Beverley in for Avery but that might not be much of a difference
and the Beverley-Lou combo is keeping us in games
you can try Wallace but his lack of a shot over 10 feet will destroy the spacing
it's not that Avery's good it's that the alternatives are not appealing either
Then sit Bradley a few games and play a shooter like Milo or Jerome with Williams and Wallace. It’s not time for more excuses for these slow starts we have enough depth to stop sitting on our hands doing nothing.
We’ve done everything else but give DNPs to our worse offensive player.
I'd agree with you except the problem has been defense
we gave up 37 points in the first Q and that's why we lost
we won the other 3 quarters
TheNewEra wrote:esqtvd wrote:TheNewEra wrote:
Then sit Bradley a few games and play a shooter like Milo or Jerome with Williams and Wallace. It’s not time for more excuses for these slow starts we have enough depth to stop sitting on our hands doing nothing.
We’ve done everything else but give DNPs to our worse offensive player.
I'd agree with you except the problem has been defense
we gave up 37 points in the first Q and that's why we lost
we won the other 3 quarters
Which makes matters worse. You can play that poorly on offense and not be placeholder starter or defensive anchor. Draymond can be crap shooting because he can anchor the defense and be a playmaker. When Bradley struggles it’s doughnuts across the board and he’s a guard so he can’t even help protect the paint.
If the defense sucks and he’s not able to spread his impact across the floor and doesn’t provide other stat fillers what’s the point?
esqtvd wrote:TheNewEra wrote:esqtvd wrote:
I'd agree with you except the problem has been defense
we gave up 37 points in the first Q and that's why we lost
we won the other 3 quarters
Which makes matters worse. You can play that poorly on offense and not be placeholder starter or defensive anchor. Draymond can be crap shooting because he can anchor the defense and be a playmaker. When Bradley struggles it’s doughnuts across the board and he’s a guard so he can’t even help protect the paint.
If the defense sucks and he’s not able to spread his impact across the floor and doesn’t provide other stat fillers what’s the point?
Shai hasn't been impressive either, Gortat's a stiff, and today the biggest problem was that Tobias scored 11 points and was a team-worst minus-17.
It's impossible to argue that Bradley's been a plus but the real problem is the alternatives aren't promising either. Putting a scorer out there is not the solution to the real problem.
At one point, Avery was on the brink of turning it around but admittedly has regressed again over the past 2 weeks. But Beverley was just as bad in the beginning of the season and now the investment in him is paying off. He looks good, is humping, and is one of the few besides Lou and Trezz supplying any fire.
But is it time to pull the plug on Bradley? Maybe, sure. But the investment in Pat Bev--who looked just as bad at one point--paid off. And Bradley hit the pine with 4 minutes left in the 3rd today and didn't get any more minutes. That was probably a first. Maybe the plug is coming out of the wall.
Roscoe Sheed wrote:I don’t understand what happened to Bradley’s offensive game. He used to be above average but now he is one of the worst offensive players in the nba
TheNewEra wrote:esqtvd wrote:TheNewEra wrote:
Which makes matters worse. You can play that poorly on offense and not be placeholder starter or defensive anchor. Draymond can be crap shooting because he can anchor the defense and be a playmaker. When Bradley struggles it’s doughnuts across the board and he’s a guard so he can’t even help protect the paint.
If the defense sucks and he’s not able to spread his impact across the floor and doesn’t provide other stat fillers what’s the point?
Shai hasn't been impressive either, Gortat's a stiff, and today the biggest problem was that Tobias scored 11 points and was a team-worst minus-17.
It's impossible to argue that Bradley's been a plus but the real problem is the alternatives aren't promising either. Putting a scorer out there is not the solution to the real problem.
At one point, Avery was on the brink of turning it around but admittedly has regressed again over the past 2 weeks. But Beverley was just as bad in the beginning of the season and now the investment in him is paying off. He looks good, is humping, and is one of the few besides Lou and Trezz supplying any fire.
But is it time to pull the plug on Bradley? Maybe, sure. But the investment in Pat Bev--who looked just as bad at one point--paid off. And Bradley hit the pine with 4 minutes left in the 3rd today and didn't get any more minutes. That was probably a first. Maybe the plug is coming out of the wall.
Beverly was never this bad consistently and Bradley started the season struggling and still has yet to have a consistent stride.
Another thing Beverly as a player is more experienced in getting himself into the game to make a impact. Beverly if having a bad game will still get you some extra rebounds, assists, annoy the other player, and push the tempo as a ball handler.
Don’t think it’s even up for debate Beverly is the superior player to Bradley
Roscoe Sheed wrote:I don’t understand what happened to Bradley’s offensive game. He used to be above average but now he is one of the worst offensive players in the nba
TheNewEra wrote:Roscoe Sheed wrote:I don’t understand what happened to Bradley’s offensive game. He used to be above average but now he is one of the worst offensive players in the nba
Been struggling for some year I think the Celtics saw it coming
Roscoe Sheed wrote:I don’t understand what happened to Bradley’s offensive game. He used to be above average but now he is one of the worst offensive players in the nba
Return to Los Angeles Clippers