RingColluder wrote:esqtvd wrote:Clemenza wrote:I believe you can't trade him until his extension kicks in which is over the summer/next season
I believe Luke can be traded but the $3.7M he's making this year won't bring back an impact player, and his extension looks like an albatross at the moment.
IMO, Zubac is the only one with real trade value and only middling. If Patterson agreed to a trade we could package Zu with Pat Pat and Fi for PJ Tucker, but does that really make us better?Code: Select all
[b]Players with Trade Restrictions[/b]
Patrick Patterson from Los Angeles Clippers
Patterson is a one year bird player, which means he must agree to the deal for any trade to happen. Further, if Patterson agrees to be traded, his Bird status will be reset and he will be viewed as a non-bird free agent this summer.
Not at all. I'd keep Zu over PJ Tucker.
We need a center or a PG, I can't believe how bad Luke kennard is playing.
If we had not signed him to a deal, we'd be able to trade him easier. Such an awful contract, one of the worst in Clippers history besides that Blake Griffin max deal. Awful job.
I'd be willing to trade Zu for a legit PG veteran plus pieces and risk playing Ibaka and Morris heavy minutes.
So who are you having defend the Jokic, Ayton, Ad/Gasol, and Nurk of the playoffs ?