Superstar vs. Role Players, Point Guard Edition
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2021 7:34 pm
Damian Lillard
- 6x NBA All Star, gives Clippers a True Big 3
- Career APG 6.6
- Can make Sudden Death Shots (down 1 or 2 PTS less than 5 sec. in 4th or overtime, no ties, last shot ends game): Clippers need a clutch shooter outside of Leonard and George
John Wall
- 5x NBA All Star, gives Clippers a True Big 3
- Career APG 9.1, best true passer and point guard since Chris Paul
- Reclamation project: has had down years due to injury - Clippers are great at resurrecting damaged goods
- Vouched for George to join Wizards while he was a Pacer
Ben Simmons
- 3x NBA All Star, gives Clippers a True Big 3 due to Three C's Rule (Consistent, consecutive, current)
- Career APG 7.7, plays both point guard and center, solving BOTH position problems
- Too young to be called a reclamation project, but fits bill due to bad playoff performance, would be seen as re-development prospect
- Connection with former Clipper coach Doc Rivers, who is swayed by players and teams he coached for in the past, might play a role in trade talks
...or, you could just screw the Big 3 idea completely and maintain the Dynamic Duo ideology and role player as point guard concept. Take it further, no true point guards, let's fake the point guard position and have shooting guards, forwards and centers all pretend to be a point guard. Both George and Leonard had a career high in assists last season, 5.2 APG each. Jackson became a run stopper, making shots to end scoring droughts as means of bringing his team back into games. Mann is an All-Star in the making, his career high 39-point outing in playoffs versus Jazz to cement their back to back 2-0 comeback (first in NBA history before Bucks did it with a championship on the line) and first ever conference finals berth - in addition to being a natural born All-Star candidate, which Clippers have none (George and Leonard's All-Star debuts were with Pacers and Spurs respectively).
Also keep in mind Clippers have become Spursian in a yearly pace. They are looking for Good Samaritan-type players, high in character who won't be a distraction and public relations problem, or cause chaos and division within the locker room. It's all about unity, togetherness and chemistry, and the Big 3 concept goes against the spirit of basketball. Both Suns and Bucks are case studies of teams not needing Big 3s, Fantastic 4s or Fabulous 5s to make an NBA Finals: Suns had Booker and Paul, Bucks had a one-man band in Antetokounmpo. Clippers are aspiring to be more like those humble teams, not the power-hungry teams that radiate dominance and evil.
So yeah: would you rather have a Big 3, or be a Dynamic Duo and let anyone be a point guard?
- 6x NBA All Star, gives Clippers a True Big 3
- Career APG 6.6
- Can make Sudden Death Shots (down 1 or 2 PTS less than 5 sec. in 4th or overtime, no ties, last shot ends game): Clippers need a clutch shooter outside of Leonard and George
John Wall
- 5x NBA All Star, gives Clippers a True Big 3
- Career APG 9.1, best true passer and point guard since Chris Paul
- Reclamation project: has had down years due to injury - Clippers are great at resurrecting damaged goods
- Vouched for George to join Wizards while he was a Pacer
Ben Simmons
- 3x NBA All Star, gives Clippers a True Big 3 due to Three C's Rule (Consistent, consecutive, current)
- Career APG 7.7, plays both point guard and center, solving BOTH position problems
- Too young to be called a reclamation project, but fits bill due to bad playoff performance, would be seen as re-development prospect
- Connection with former Clipper coach Doc Rivers, who is swayed by players and teams he coached for in the past, might play a role in trade talks
...or, you could just screw the Big 3 idea completely and maintain the Dynamic Duo ideology and role player as point guard concept. Take it further, no true point guards, let's fake the point guard position and have shooting guards, forwards and centers all pretend to be a point guard. Both George and Leonard had a career high in assists last season, 5.2 APG each. Jackson became a run stopper, making shots to end scoring droughts as means of bringing his team back into games. Mann is an All-Star in the making, his career high 39-point outing in playoffs versus Jazz to cement their back to back 2-0 comeback (first in NBA history before Bucks did it with a championship on the line) and first ever conference finals berth - in addition to being a natural born All-Star candidate, which Clippers have none (George and Leonard's All-Star debuts were with Pacers and Spurs respectively).
Also keep in mind Clippers have become Spursian in a yearly pace. They are looking for Good Samaritan-type players, high in character who won't be a distraction and public relations problem, or cause chaos and division within the locker room. It's all about unity, togetherness and chemistry, and the Big 3 concept goes against the spirit of basketball. Both Suns and Bucks are case studies of teams not needing Big 3s, Fantastic 4s or Fabulous 5s to make an NBA Finals: Suns had Booker and Paul, Bucks had a one-man band in Antetokounmpo. Clippers are aspiring to be more like those humble teams, not the power-hungry teams that radiate dominance and evil.
So yeah: would you rather have a Big 3, or be a Dynamic Duo and let anyone be a point guard?