mkwest wrote:I believe we hold a club option for Davis next season, so I could see him back next year since he won't be too expensive. It's a shame he went down right when he was starting to show something.
Oh, well in that case I'm glad I was mistaken, I'd love to see P-Diddy playing for us again next year. Based on what he was showing before he got hurt, he is just as good as any other backup C in the leauge. And when we got Kaman & Brand playing ahead of him...average is all we need.
mkwest wrote:EB's game is sick.
Nice.
mkwest wrote:If Livingston can develop a respectable shot, then he's going to be really effective. His vision is what made him so special anyways so I'm not too worried about the leg.
I maintain that SL14 should be one of the best jumpshooters from about 15-19 ft in the league next season-- his J is literally all he could work on for almost a year! His FT% should be up too, using that same logic. But I'm with you on all accounts about the guys you mentioned, MK. We definitely have the tools to be a beast next season, no matter what happens with the lottery in June.
jgustav1 wrote:Even with Brand back, I don't see the Clippers breaking 40 wins next year unless they get lucky in the lottery and pickup Derrick Rose. That won't be close to making the playoffs in the West next year.
This might be just me, but I don't think the West is gonna be nearly as good next year. You know how sometimes a team will have a great season and eveybody jumps on the bandwagon, they waltz into the playoffs, get swept and aren't in the playoffs again for years? They call that a fluke season, and I think the entire NBA is having one of those this year. I can see your argument about Portland & Golden State only getting better, but the main thing that gets you a large number of wins is chemistry. Right now I think there is just an unnatural amount of
it floating around the West this year, so much so that I don't think we'll ever see something like this again, let alone in consecutive seasons.