ImageImageImageImageImage

"Maggette's future with Clippers is uncertain"

Moderators: og15, TrueLAfan

mkwest
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,910
And1: 5,728
Joined: Dec 18, 2005
   

"Maggette's future with Clippers is uncertain" 

Post#1 » by mkwest » Thu Apr 3, 2008 10:51 pm

Concerns remain over how Maggette will fit into next year's Clippers team. If Brand returns, along with rapidly developing forward Al Thornton and center Chris Kaman -- they will all be looking for the basketball.

There's also his sometimes tenuous relationship with Dunleavy.


Dunleavy said that issues between them over Maggette's role on the team are in the past. Still, he would still like to see Maggette become a better defender.

"You look at [Corey's] body and you think that he could be a defensive stopper, and that's one of the things we would like him to continue working on," Dunleavy said.

Said Maggette: "At the end of the day, if I'm going to be here, it's because of the loyalty from the fans, the general manager and the owner. We'll see."


LA Times
User avatar
ClipperEric
Rookie
Posts: 1,065
And1: 5
Joined: Jan 03, 2008
Location: Long Beach

 

Post#2 » by ClipperEric » Fri Apr 4, 2008 1:01 am

Our best possible use of Maggette is for Trade Bait to bring in a quality PG.
mkwest
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,910
And1: 5,728
Joined: Dec 18, 2005
   

 

Post#3 » by mkwest » Fri Apr 4, 2008 2:12 am

I thought it was funny who he did/did not mention for being reasons if he's here next season.

I think that after Mid-May when the lottery has taken place we'll have a more clear cut view of how to approach his situation. If we wind up with a top 2 then we draft Rose, we would be able to keep him and slide him down to the 2. If we end up with Mayo or Gordon then a S&T is best option for all parties.
User avatar
mj_shoefanatic
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,113
And1: 104
Joined: Dec 23, 2007
Location: Lob Angeles
       

 

Post#4 » by mj_shoefanatic » Fri Apr 4, 2008 2:32 am

We better get equal value if we trade Maggette via S&T.
illastrate
Starter
Posts: 2,250
And1: 635
Joined: Aug 16, 2006
   

 

Post#5 » by illastrate » Fri Apr 4, 2008 4:02 pm

mj_shoefanatic wrote:We better get equal value if we trade Maggette via S&T.


How about for Ben Gordon straight up?
User avatar
JJ LoDuca
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,834
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 18, 2007
Location: SoCal

 

Post#6 » by JJ LoDuca » Fri Apr 4, 2008 4:49 pm

All I can say is, we better not let another free agent go for nothing. What I like about this situation is that Corey really does control his own destiny, so if he's here come next season, it's because he truly wants to be. No more of this "trade me or don't trade me" drama. I think we can get some good value for him if we pull a S&T, but I'd love to see him back.
-Ms. JJ
User avatar
PlinkingPanda
Analyst
Posts: 3,413
And1: 2
Joined: Feb 08, 2008
Location: West Covina, CA

 

Post#7 » by PlinkingPanda » Fri Apr 4, 2008 6:37 pm

I'd like to see him back if he could play the SG position(if he can manage to keep his jumpshot), but if he stays at the SF and takes up Al's time then I would like to trade him for someone who can fill a role we need. Either way I wish the best for him. I have much respect to him, Brand, and Piatkowski for resigning with the Clips in their careers. I don't remember many players who did resign with us(besides Kaman). >.>
User avatar
madmaxmedia
RealGM
Posts: 12,513
And1: 7,459
Joined: Jun 22, 2001
Location: SoCal
     

 

Post#8 » by madmaxmedia » Fri Apr 4, 2008 7:56 pm

mj_shoefanatic wrote:We better get equal value if we trade Maggette via S&T.


It's not within our control. Corey could opt out and walk, and we get absolutely nothing.

A S&T might work out best for all involved parties, but we'll just have to see what trade partners are out there, what potential players we can bring in, etc.
User avatar
Tommy Trojan
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,447
And1: 36
Joined: Aug 19, 2006
Location: Los Angeles

 

Post#9 » by Tommy Trojan » Sun Apr 6, 2008 5:32 am

illastrate wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



How about for Ben Gordon straight up?


That should be a good trade, but I think Magg is much better quality than Gordon
mapko81
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,800
And1: 18
Joined: Nov 21, 2006

 

Post#10 » by mapko81 » Mon Apr 7, 2008 4:21 am

Raptor fans would hand over TJ Ford for Maggette on a silver platter (mind you, he doesn't do much for our defensive troubles)
livingston2kaman
Banned User
Posts: 1,129
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 04, 2005

 

Post#11 » by livingston2kaman » Mon Apr 7, 2008 6:44 pm

S&T for Jason Terry is what I'll try to do if Dallas still has the offer on the table. Hell, I'd give them the Minny pick as well if we get a couple of 2nd rounders from them[08 and 09]. Terry brings in what we got with Sam Cassell, minus the smartness, by that, I mean a guard who isn't afraid to shoot and is damn clutch. With Knight/Livingston, the opposing Point Guard can help double on EB and Chris, but with Terry, they won't because dude will knock down the open J.
User avatar
ClipperDomination
Veteran
Posts: 2,804
And1: 2
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Los Angeles

 

Post#12 » by ClipperDomination » Mon Apr 7, 2008 11:32 pm

A S&T would be the most obvious way to get the most talent in exchange for him. I think he's had enough of losing in LA.

S&T Maggette and the 6th for S&T Gilbert and their pick (it's projected at 18 right now) could be a possible idea.
Clip34life
Analyst
Posts: 3,627
And1: 16
Joined: Jun 19, 2002

hmm 

Post#13 » by Clip34life » Tue Apr 8, 2008 2:51 am

Wizards won't touch that. I think a package of Maggz+#6 pick for Baron Davis is feasible though.
User avatar
bulldogcharly
Junior
Posts: 258
And1: 6
Joined: Jul 06, 2007

 

Post#14 » by bulldogcharly » Tue Apr 8, 2008 4:49 am

ClipperDomination wrote:A S&T would be the most obvious way to get the most talent in exchange for him. I think he's had enough of losing in LA.

S&T Maggette and the 6th for S&T Gilbert and their pick (it's projected at 18 right now) could be a possible idea.


are you kidding me? we can get gilbert for nothing. he already said hes opting out so we can just sign him and if we did a trade we would definitely not give up our lottery pick. why take a chance on arenas whos older than the lottery pick and has tons of knee problems and is a ballhog when we can have a young guy like mayo?
User avatar
Tommy Trojan
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,447
And1: 36
Joined: Aug 19, 2006
Location: Los Angeles

 

Post#15 » by Tommy Trojan » Tue Apr 8, 2008 6:34 am

I would not trade Magg for Terry. I think Magg has more value than Terry. I think if somehow you guys can pull of a trade for agent 0 would be awesome. That would give you guys a playoff team.
jgustav1
Analyst
Posts: 3,367
And1: 21
Joined: Jul 29, 2003

 

Post#16 » by jgustav1 » Sat Apr 12, 2008 7:01 am

bulldogcharly wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



are you kidding me? we can get gilbert for nothing. he already said hes opting out so we can just sign him and if we did a trade we would definitely not give up our lottery pick. why take a chance on arenas whos older than the lottery pick and has tons of knee problems and is a ballhog when we can have a young guy like mayo?


The Clippers would have to do a sign and trade for Arenas, they can't get him for nothing since they are over the cap. The Clippers would have to give up a lot more than just a lottery pick for Arenas to matchup the salaries.

Return to Los Angeles Clippers