ImageImageImageImageImage

Would this work for a new offseason plan?

Moderators: og15, TrueLAfan

nykballa2k4
RealGM
Posts: 31,039
And1: 7,416
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: Kurt Rhombus is managing the defense...
       

Would this work for a new offseason plan? 

Post#1 » by nykballa2k4 » Wed Jul 9, 2008 10:32 pm

now that Elton is gone and BDiddy is still on board, thats 14 mil to use on new players.
Deng and Gordon are both FA's and Zach Randolph is being shopped by the pf-heavy (literally) Knicks.

first - trade Tim Thomas and Cuttino Mobley along with a future protected pick for Zach Randolph
second - sign Loul Deng starting at 8 mil a year, sign ben gordon starting around 6. (if Gordon wants more, maybe maggette would like to be a part of a S&T? 6 is what he is likely going for)

anyway, this all winds up with the following team for LAC

Kaman/Powell
Randolph/Thornton
Deng
Gordon/Gordon
BDiddy

only thing really lacking is a stromile swift type, but that can be addressed at a later time.
livingston2kaman
Banned User
Posts: 1,129
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 04, 2005

Re: Would this work for a new offseason plan? 

Post#2 » by livingston2kaman » Wed Jul 9, 2008 10:46 pm

If anything, we should be getting a first because Zach has negative value
User avatar
PlinkingPanda
Analyst
Posts: 3,413
And1: 2
Joined: Feb 08, 2008
Location: West Covina, CA

Re: Would this work for a new offseason plan? 

Post#3 » by PlinkingPanda » Wed Jul 9, 2008 10:46 pm

lol you Knicks fans really want to dump Randolph somewhere don't ya. XD
User avatar
thanumba2clippersfan
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,689
And1: 700
Joined: Aug 11, 2005
Location: State College, PA
Contact:
     

Re: Would this work for a new offseason plan? 

Post#4 » by thanumba2clippersfan » Wed Jul 9, 2008 11:12 pm

Maggette has officially signed with Golden State, so this won't work.
I've been an LA Clipper fan since 1998 and that will never change. I hate our new logo and jerseys!
User avatar
ClipperDomination
Veteran
Posts: 2,804
And1: 2
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Would this work for a new offseason plan? 

Post#5 » by ClipperDomination » Wed Jul 9, 2008 11:32 pm

NYK fans, please stop with the Randolph ideas.
illastrate
Starter
Posts: 2,250
And1: 635
Joined: Aug 16, 2006
   

Re: Would this work for a new offseason plan? 

Post#6 » by illastrate » Thu Jul 10, 2008 1:41 am

this is unreleastic on so many levels. Deng for 8mil? Gordon for 6? haha.

Maggs is gone too.
nykballa2k4
RealGM
Posts: 31,039
And1: 7,416
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: Kurt Rhombus is managing the defense...
       

Re: Would this work for a new offseason plan? 

Post#7 » by nykballa2k4 » Thu Jul 10, 2008 3:10 am

illastrate wrote:this is unreleastic on so many levels. Deng for 8mil? Gordon for 6? haha.

Maggs is gone too.


Well, I did not know about maggette, but I don't think its unrealistic to at least make a good play at Deng OR Gordon, maybe both. I don't know what these players are rumored to want, but I'd bet Clippers can get someone to fill a spot or two. Also, trading for Randolph makes sense on a lot of levels for you guys because you are used to a low post/high post capable player on offense.
Randolph gets a bad reputation because he is not ideal for a team that has more attractive, CHEAPER options. Portland traded away his max deal because they had Alderidge and Oden, Knicks need to move one of he or Eddy Curry because one is semi-retarded and the other is just grounded. didn't Zbo play well under dunlevy in portland, or am i thinking of a different head coach? But the bottom line is you guys have a need for a scoring power forward, and we have one to spare. The pick will presumably be a non-lotto pick, so that should net us a future bench player.
Numbers don't lie, people who use them do
Stand up to all hate
Stand up to Jewish hate
User avatar
ClipperDomination
Veteran
Posts: 2,804
And1: 2
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Would this work for a new offseason plan? 

Post#8 » by ClipperDomination » Thu Jul 10, 2008 3:16 am

^ You have one to spare because he's worth negative value...

Return to Los Angeles Clippers