now that Elton is gone and BDiddy is still on board, thats 14 mil to use on new players.
Deng and Gordon are both FA's and Zach Randolph is being shopped by the pf-heavy (literally) Knicks.
first - trade Tim Thomas and Cuttino Mobley along with a future protected pick for Zach Randolph
second - sign Loul Deng starting at 8 mil a year, sign ben gordon starting around 6. (if Gordon wants more, maybe maggette would like to be a part of a S&T? 6 is what he is likely going for)
anyway, this all winds up with the following team for LAC
Kaman/Powell
Randolph/Thornton
Deng
Gordon/Gordon
BDiddy
only thing really lacking is a stromile swift type, but that can be addressed at a later time.
Would this work for a new offseason plan?
Would this work for a new offseason plan?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 31,039
- And1: 7,416
- Joined: Jul 26, 2004
- Location: Kurt Rhombus is managing the defense...
-
Re: Would this work for a new offseason plan?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 1,129
- And1: 0
- Joined: Oct 04, 2005
Re: Would this work for a new offseason plan?
If anything, we should be getting a first because Zach has negative value
Re: Would this work for a new offseason plan?
- PlinkingPanda
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,413
- And1: 2
- Joined: Feb 08, 2008
- Location: West Covina, CA
Re: Would this work for a new offseason plan?
lol you Knicks fans really want to dump Randolph somewhere don't ya. XD
Re: Would this work for a new offseason plan?
- thanumba2clippersfan
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 13,689
- And1: 700
- Joined: Aug 11, 2005
- Location: State College, PA
- Contact:
-
Re: Would this work for a new offseason plan?
Maggette has officially signed with Golden State, so this won't work.
I've been an LA Clipper fan since 1998 and that will never change. I hate our new logo and jerseys!
Re: Would this work for a new offseason plan?
- ClipperDomination
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,804
- And1: 2
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: Would this work for a new offseason plan?
NYK fans, please stop with the Randolph ideas.
Re: Would this work for a new offseason plan?
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,250
- And1: 635
- Joined: Aug 16, 2006
-
Re: Would this work for a new offseason plan?
this is unreleastic on so many levels. Deng for 8mil? Gordon for 6? haha.
Maggs is gone too.
Maggs is gone too.
Re: Would this work for a new offseason plan?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 31,039
- And1: 7,416
- Joined: Jul 26, 2004
- Location: Kurt Rhombus is managing the defense...
-
Re: Would this work for a new offseason plan?
illastrate wrote:this is unreleastic on so many levels. Deng for 8mil? Gordon for 6? haha.
Maggs is gone too.
Well, I did not know about maggette, but I don't think its unrealistic to at least make a good play at Deng OR Gordon, maybe both. I don't know what these players are rumored to want, but I'd bet Clippers can get someone to fill a spot or two. Also, trading for Randolph makes sense on a lot of levels for you guys because you are used to a low post/high post capable player on offense.
Randolph gets a bad reputation because he is not ideal for a team that has more attractive, CHEAPER options. Portland traded away his max deal because they had Alderidge and Oden, Knicks need to move one of he or Eddy Curry because one is semi-retarded and the other is just grounded. didn't Zbo play well under dunlevy in portland, or am i thinking of a different head coach? But the bottom line is you guys have a need for a scoring power forward, and we have one to spare. The pick will presumably be a non-lotto pick, so that should net us a future bench player.
Numbers don't lie, people who use them do
Stand up to all hate
Stand up to Jewish hate
Stand up to all hate
Stand up to Jewish hate
Re: Would this work for a new offseason plan?
- ClipperDomination
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,804
- And1: 2
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: Would this work for a new offseason plan?
^ You have one to spare because he's worth negative value...
Return to Los Angeles Clippers