ImageImageImageImageImage

Michael Finley

Moderators: og15, TrueLAfan

loflin3hree5ive
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 7,342
And1: 67
Joined: Aug 27, 2003
Location: Clipperland

Michael Finley 

Post#1 » by loflin3hree5ive » Sat Jul 26, 2008 4:27 pm

I've been thinking of potential Clipper free agents, and I'm starting to think Finley could be a possibility. He's old, we all know that. But shooting doesn't fall off with age. If the Clippers offer him a long enough contract, Finley might just take it.

4 years $15 million? It's more of a commitment than any team should want to make, but it isn't an unreasonable price. Acquiring a guy like Finley might just convince Cassell that it's worth coming back to the Clips. Other older free agents with out as much value as Finley might also start to consider the Clippers as a destination with vets like Dunleavy, Mobley, Finley and Camby running things.

Any thoughts?
User avatar
ClipperEric
Rookie
Posts: 1,065
And1: 5
Joined: Jan 03, 2008
Location: Long Beach

Re: Michael Finley 

Post#2 » by ClipperEric » Sat Jul 26, 2008 6:42 pm

I've always liked Finley. He's an amazing shooter and has been a Clipper Killer many times.

But that's just way too much for an old man. He can still shoot but he's not much of a defender. I doubt he's more than just some instant-offense off the bench these days.

If we could pull him in for maybe 2years, $2mil per, that would be great. But he was almost a $20mil/year guy, so who knows what he's looking for.
User avatar
adiedanny
Senior
Posts: 721
And1: 5
Joined: Jul 07, 2006
Location: Covina,Ca

Re: Michael Finley 

Post#3 » by adiedanny » Sun Jul 27, 2008 12:10 am

Any potential FA should get the same offer Azubuike received. We need to have space in 2010. I still would rather have Ricky Davis, if he willing to sign for that amount and understands he will be coming off the bench.
illastrate
Starter
Posts: 2,250
And1: 635
Joined: Aug 16, 2006
   

Re: Michael Finley 

Post#4 » by illastrate » Sun Jul 27, 2008 3:49 am

I've seen people mention Robert Horry and Michael Finley as possible candidates, and it just makes no sense. Horry has nothing to contribute to our team except threes. Finley is still a nice player, but he's 35. Ideally, we need a guy who can be one of Baron's running mates. We have to build this team around B.Diddy to maximize our talents. That's why Bookie would've been such a great addition.

Ricky Davis would probably be the best choice, as far as strictly basketball goes, but then again this IS Ricky Davis. And Wells is a multi-talented player, but again, attitude problems. However, Dun did try to sign him in '05, so maybe they have a good relationship from the Portland days. Personally, Kirk Snyder would be my choice, he's young, athletic, and skilled at the wing. And he would come relatively cheap. Check out this highlight clip:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dz_9rA1-sIg
User avatar
mj_shoefanatic
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,113
And1: 104
Joined: Dec 23, 2007
Location: Lob Angeles
       

Re: Michael Finley 

Post#5 » by mj_shoefanatic » Sun Jul 27, 2008 4:02 am

We have enough old guys on this team. JR Smith or Kirk Synder would be the best fit on this new look run-n-gun Clipper team.
mkwest
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,910
And1: 5,728
Joined: Dec 18, 2005
   

Re: Michael Finley 

Post#6 » by mkwest » Sun Jul 27, 2008 4:19 am

I personally don't think we're the right situation for Finley. If we were a championship contender in need of a 3-point assassin then definitely. He recently turned down a deal from some Euro club, so I am inclined to believe that he's playing for the gold as opposed to the green.

I have that read Bonzi Wells & Ricky Davis are the likely frontrunners that we're persuing, but it's only a rumor so I don't know how true it is.
illastrate
Starter
Posts: 2,250
And1: 635
Joined: Aug 16, 2006
   

Re: Michael Finley 

Post#7 » by illastrate » Sun Jul 27, 2008 5:22 am

mj_shoefanatic wrote:We have enough old guys on this team. JR Smith or Kirk Synder would be the best fit on this new look run-n-gun Clipper team.


Exactly. Although JR is an RFA, so Denver will likely match (3mil won't do it). Which leaves Snyder as our best bet.
User avatar
mj_shoefanatic
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,113
And1: 104
Joined: Dec 23, 2007
Location: Lob Angeles
       

Re: Michael Finley 

Post#8 » by mj_shoefanatic » Sun Jul 27, 2008 8:38 am

Yeah _enver needs JR more than we do. :lol:
jgustav1
Analyst
Posts: 3,367
And1: 21
Joined: Jul 29, 2003

Re: Michael Finley 

Post#9 » by jgustav1 » Sun Jul 27, 2008 5:04 pm

loflin3hree5ive wrote:I've been thinking of potential Clipper free agents, and I'm starting to think Finley could be a possibility. He's old, we all know that. But shooting doesn't fall off with age. If the Clippers offer him a long enough contract, Finley might just take it.

4 years $15 million? It's more of a commitment than any team should want to make, but it isn't an unreasonable price. Acquiring a guy like Finley might just convince Cassell that it's worth coming back to the Clips. Other older free agents with out as much value as Finley might also start to consider the Clippers as a destination with vets like Dunleavy, Mobley, Finley and Camby running things.

Any thoughts?


That is way too much and too long of a contract for Finley. I look for him to sign a 1 or 2 year deal with a championship contender like the Celtics or return to the Spurs.

Cassell isn't coming back, why would you want him back in the first place after he insisted on being bought out?
User avatar
madmaxmedia
RealGM
Posts: 12,513
And1: 7,461
Joined: Jun 22, 2001
Location: SoCal
     

Re: Michael Finley 

Post#10 » by madmaxmedia » Mon Jul 28, 2008 5:10 pm

I think the length of the contract was suggested as a way to 'sweeten the deal', vs. him signing a 1/2 year contract with a Boston, Detroit, San Antonio, etc.

But yeah, it is too long to make sense for us, the last couple of years might be kinda dicey.

It is an interesting prospect to me though. I'd rather have Finley taking the big 4Q shot than TT, and having his offense off the bench would not be bad for winning now rather than later. How about 3 years for $12 million?

I'm personally not too worried about the FA market in 2 years. Rather than compete with a bunch of other teams for a few marquee players that we're probably not getting anyway, I think our much more likely opportunity is to package TT and Mobley expiring next year and get a good player in return (there will be good players available as other teams try to clear cap room.) Then keep Camby if he's still playing at a high level. On top of that, we sign say Finley to fill in some quality bench minutes at the wing, sign a quality MLE next year, plus Gordon and Thornton's continued development...That's the best, most realistic way for the team to improve IMO.

Return to Los Angeles Clippers