Schefter:There are candidates Bucs like,that we don't know..

Nemesis21 · Post #1 » by **Nemesis21** » Thu Jan 5, 2012 8:54 pm

http://www.bucsnation.com/2012/1/5/2684 ... at-we-dont

Post #2 » by **craig01** » Fri Jan 6, 2012 1:34 am

Well, if the Bucs still refuse to spend this year, then even Vince Lombardi couldn't get the job done with their paltry, thieving, and putrid payroll.

GameOver25 · Post #3 » by **GameOver25** » Fri Jan 6, 2012 3:25 pm

Even before the season started, I was thinking how come the Bucs aren't going after any big names free agents. The WR position should of definitely been upgraded. The worse thing that happen was our record last year. So that allowed the front office to sell the fans on the so called "youth movement". Fools gold I tell you lol....

Post #4 » by **craig01** » Sat Jan 7, 2012 3:52 pm

WR/OL/DL/LB/DB/RB all needed upgrades....LOL

Cheap Owners suck.

Max Power · Post #5 » by **Max Power** » Tue Jan 24, 2012 8:56 pm

At this point none of the "public" candidates for the Buccaneers job impress me. Mike Sherman..meh. Brad Childress...Hell No! All I know is it's time for the Bucs to revamp that defense, linebackers should be job number one once the new coach is hired.

Nemesis21 · Post #6 » by **Nemesis21** » Tue Jan 24, 2012 9:05 pm

Max Power wrote:At this point none of the "public" candidates for the Buccaneers job impress me. Mike Sherman..meh. Brad Childress...Hell No! All I know is it's time for the Bucs to revamp that defense, linebackers should be job number one once the new coach is hired.

Agree, no to Sherman and Childress. Give me Marty or Zimmer.

Post #7 » by **craig01** » Wed Jan 25, 2012 12:08 am

My vote goes to Schottenheimer

nateakaspyder · Post #8 » by **nateakaspyder** » Wed Jan 25, 2012 4:21 am

Sherman would be the worst case scenario in my eyes. Living in Wisconsin, he was one of the bigger reasons I stopped cheering for the Packers when I was young.

Nemesis21 · Post #9 » by **Nemesis21** » Wed Jan 25, 2012 5:54 pm

Sherman is the first to get a 2nd interview. God, the Glazer's are dumb. I have a feeling they will make a Sherman or Childress type hire.

Post #10 » by **craig01** » Wed Jan 25, 2012 7:53 pm

nateakaspyder wrote:Sherman would be the worst case scenario in my eyes. Living in Wisconsin, he was one of the bigger reasons I stopped cheering for the Packers when I was young.

Agreed.

Post #11 » by **craig01** » Wed Jan 25, 2012 7:55 pm

Nemesis21 wrote:Sherman is the first to get a 2nd interview. God, the Glazer's are dumb. I have a feeling they will make a Sherman or Childress type hire.

That would be awful.

But didn't we both say that Morris was an awful hire too? (I know I did)

Oh....wait....Morris was a bad hire.

Sherman=blah.

Nemesis21 · Post #12 » by **Nemesis21** » Wed Jan 25, 2012 8:28 pm

craig01 wrote:
Nemesis21 wrote:Sherman is the first to get a 2nd interview. God, the Glazer's are dumb. I have a feeling they will make a Sherman or Childress type hire.

That would be awful.

But didn't we both say that Morris was an awful hire too? (I know I did)

Oh....wait....Morris was a bad hire.

Sherman=blah.

Yes, I never liked the Morris hire.

Post #13 » by **craig01** » Thu Jan 26, 2012 1:14 am

Nemesis21 wrote:
craig01 wrote:
Nemesis21 wrote:Sherman is the first to get a 2nd interview. God, the Glazer's are dumb. I have a feeling they will make a Sherman or Childress type hire.

That would be awful.

But didn't we both say that Morris was an awful hire too? (I know I did)

Oh....wait....Morris was a bad hire.

Sherman=blah.

Yes, I never liked the Morris hire.

Thought that's how I remembered it