Page 1 of 1
Schefter:There are candidates Bucs like,that we don't know..
Posted: Thu Jan 5, 2012 8:54 pm
by Nemesis21
Re: Schefter:There are candidates Bucs like,that we don't kn
Posted: Fri Jan 6, 2012 1:34 am
by craig01
Well, if the Bucs still refuse to spend this year, then even Vince Lombardi couldn't get the job done with their paltry, thieving, and putrid payroll.
Re: Schefter:There are candidates Bucs like,that we don't kn
Posted: Fri Jan 6, 2012 3:25 pm
by GameOver25
Even before the season started, I was thinking how come the Bucs aren't going after any big names free agents. The WR position should of definitely been upgraded. The worse thing that happen was our record last year. So that allowed the front office to sell the fans on the so called "youth movement". Fools gold I tell you lol....
Re: Schefter:There are candidates Bucs like,that we don't kn
Posted: Sat Jan 7, 2012 3:52 pm
by craig01
WR/OL/DL/LB/DB/RB all needed upgrades....LOL
Cheap Owners suck.
Re: Schefter:There are candidates Bucs like,that we don't kn
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 8:56 pm
by Max Power
At this point none of the "public" candidates for the Buccaneers job impress me. Mike Sherman..meh. Brad Childress...Hell No! All I know is it's time for the Bucs to revamp that defense, linebackers should be job number one once the new coach is hired.
Re: Schefter:There are candidates Bucs like,that we don't kn
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 9:05 pm
by Nemesis21
Max Power wrote:At this point none of the "public" candidates for the Buccaneers job impress me. Mike Sherman..meh. Brad Childress...Hell No! All I know is it's time for the Bucs to revamp that defense, linebackers should be job number one once the new coach is hired.
Agree, no to Sherman and Childress. Give me Marty or Zimmer.
Re: Schefter:There are candidates Bucs like,that we don't kn
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 12:08 am
by craig01
My vote goes to Schottenheimer
Re: Schefter:There are candidates Bucs like,that we don't kn
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 4:21 am
by nateakaspyder
Sherman would be the worst case scenario in my eyes. Living in Wisconsin, he was one of the bigger reasons I stopped cheering for the Packers when I was young.
Re: Schefter:There are candidates Bucs like,that we don't kn
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 5:54 pm
by Nemesis21
Sherman is the first to get a 2nd interview. God, the Glazer's are dumb. I have a feeling they will make a Sherman or Childress type hire.
Re: Schefter:There are candidates Bucs like,that we don't kn
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 7:53 pm
by craig01
nateakaspyder wrote:Sherman would be the worst case scenario in my eyes. Living in Wisconsin, he was one of the bigger reasons I stopped cheering for the Packers when I was young.
Agreed.
Re: Schefter:There are candidates Bucs like,that we don't kn
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 7:55 pm
by craig01
Nemesis21 wrote:Sherman is the first to get a 2nd interview. God, the Glazer's are dumb. I have a feeling they will make a Sherman or Childress type hire.
That would be awful.
But didn't we both say that Morris was an awful hire too? (I know I did)
Oh....wait....Morris was a bad hire.
Sherman=blah.
Re: Schefter:There are candidates Bucs like,that we don't kn
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 8:28 pm
by Nemesis21
craig01 wrote:Nemesis21 wrote:Sherman is the first to get a 2nd interview. God, the Glazer's are dumb. I have a feeling they will make a Sherman or Childress type hire.
That would be awful.
But didn't we both say that Morris was an awful hire too? (I know I did)
Oh....wait....Morris was a bad hire.
Sherman=blah.
Yes, I never liked the Morris hire.
Re: Schefter:There are candidates Bucs like,that we don't kn
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 1:14 am
by craig01
Nemesis21 wrote:craig01 wrote:Nemesis21 wrote:Sherman is the first to get a 2nd interview. God, the Glazer's are dumb. I have a feeling they will make a Sherman or Childress type hire.
That would be awful.
But didn't we both say that Morris was an awful hire too? (I know I did)
Oh....wait....Morris was a bad hire.
Sherman=blah.
Yes, I never liked the Morris hire.
Thought that's how I remembered it