So Romo has to play in London, right?

[Texas Chuck]

not sure what's hard to understand here--it's tougher for Murray to get his if the other team doesn't fear your ability to burn them if they overplay the run. Weeden last week didn't come close to showing the Cardinals that they couldn't play man and focus on the run.

Same thing will happen this week with either QB in the game. Jags will test Romo's mobility and ability to throw or they will see if Weeden can get off the primary receiver and be accurate.

Murray and the line have been great(tho we have missed Free and Leary--good they should be back) but you need the threat of the pass to maximize the ground game. Acting like Murray should carry the team when the QB is terrible shows a fundamental lack of understanding of NFL football.

[Manster7588]

So the sports pundits should put Romo on the MVP list and take off Murray and the O-line. Our team isn't good enough to win without Romo is what you are basically saying here.

Saying this team is going nowhere without Romo says s hell of a lot more about Weeden than it does Murray or the OL.

For the record I think we could win without Murray but if the OL starts to go down the team is toast. If this happens it doesn't matter who the QB or RB is.

[tw1st3d]

So the sports pundits should put Romo on the MVP list and take off Murray and the O-line. Our team isn't good enough to win without Romo is what you are basically saying here.

Saying this team is going nowhere without Romo says s hell of a lot more about Weeden than it does Murray or the OL.

For the record I think we could win without Murray but if the OL starts to go down the team is toast. If this happens it doesn't matter who the QB or RB is.

Ive always disagreed when it came to Murray ..... we're a different team with him on the field .... and it's not just this year
Guess Im old school and value a Rb more than most ...... but nah I dont think he is easily replaced or a piece that should be overlooked .... his isues has always been staying healthy

[Schmoopy1000]

So the sports pundits should put Romo on the MVP list and take off Murray and the O-line. Our team isn't good enough to win without Romo is what you are basically saying here.

Saying this team is going nowhere without Romo says s hell of a lot more about Weeden than it does Murray or the OL.

For the record I think we could win without Murray but if the OL starts to go down the team is toast. If this happens it doesn't matter who the QB or RB is.

Ive always disagreed when it came to Murray ..... we're a different team with him on the field .... and it's not just this year
Guess Im old school and value a Rb more than most ...... but nah I dont think he is easily replaced or a piece that should be overlooked .... his isues has always been staying healthy

as far as old school goes, you know the RB position is easer to replace, than the other skill positions. Transition from college to the pros is much more fluid for the RB position

However I agree with what we have on the team now. We are much different with Murray in the game vs. the others.

[bluejerseyjinx]

Quite a few on ESPN, some on NESN and a few on Comcast. Just about everyone here in New England has Murray, Manning and Brady as the top MVP guys so far this year. All I am saying twist, is we should be able to win this game without Romo if we are a true playoff team. But what do I know, I'm just a ball boy.

relax bruh


this kiss kiss crap is all fine and dandy .... but at some point we gotta pick each others opinions apart

thats what a board is for ....

No kiss, kiss crap on my end. Made a stand, posted it and stand by it. I fully expect my opinions to be picked apart. Especially from those that don't respect or like me.