For the ones watching college

Romotodez · Post #1 » by **Romotodez** » Fri Jan 2, 2015 4:39 am

Why is it that I see this monster for BAMA , number 27, wearing a Giant uniform in the future

pools · Post #2 » by **pools** » Fri Jan 2, 2015 2:18 pm

Should be more concerned seeing Oregon's #8 in Philly if Kelly still has any power on that team now. Wouldn't doubt seeing a RG3 style trade from Philly.

Romotodez · Post #3 » by **Romotodez** » Fri Jan 2, 2015 2:37 pm

I wish nothing but the best for Mariotta. He seems like a great guy. I'm hoping he doesn't go to one of our rivals because I want to like him. With that being said, he is probably a lot further away than many think to being a really good qb in the NFL. Sure he has a nice skill set, but he throws to WRS that are wide open constantly - usually his first read . I've been on this point all year- I'm worried about the future of the Qb in the nfl.

Manster7588 · Post #4 » by **Manster7588** » Fri Jan 2, 2015 4:58 pm

pools wrote:Should be more concerned seeing Oregon's #8 in Philly if Kelly still has any power on that team now. Wouldn't doubt seeing a RG3 style trade from Philly.

I would love to see Philly do a RGIII trade for Mariotta. Gotta remember it would take more for Philly to move up because they are drafting at 20 not 5.

Was reading it would take 3 #1's a 2nd and a top tier player to move up.

pools · Post #5 » by **pools** » Fri Jan 2, 2015 6:52 pm

Im not sure it would take quite that much the Skins were completely fleeced with that trade I could see 2 #1's this years 2nd and 3rd.

Bucs need players now and TONS of help

Jarntt · Post #6 » by **Jarntt** » Fri Jan 2, 2015 7:15 pm

pools wrote:Im not sure it would take quite that much the Skins were completely fleeced with that trade I could see 2 #1's this years 2nd and 3rd.

Bucs need players now and TONS of help

No way could they make the move for that little.

Manster7588 · Post #7 » by **Manster7588** » Fri Jan 2, 2015 8:17 pm

pools wrote:Im not sure it would take quite that much the Skins were completely fleeced with that trade I could see 2 #1's this years 2nd and 3rd.

Bucs need players now and TONS of help

Considering the predicted price came from a NFL Exec I'd lean towards the price really being that high. Especially knowing Kelly's love for PAC12 players. Not to mention Mariotta is one of his.

Schmoopy1000 · Post #8 » by **Schmoopy1000** » Fri Jan 2, 2015 8:47 pm

no way Philly is that desperate at Qb. Foles will be back. It is not like the skins who had absolutely no one to choose from if they didn't get a QB. Philly wont pay that price. Even if the HC really wanted his guy. besides Synder doesnt control the eagles. I don't think the eagles makes a lot of dumb trades in the draft. They are a bit more savvy than the skins.

Manster7588 · Post #9 » by **Manster7588** » Fri Jan 2, 2015 8:51 pm

Schmoopy1000 wrote:no way Philly is that desperate at Qb. Foles will be back. It is not like the skins who had absolutely no one to choose from if they didn't get a QB. Philly wont pay that price. Even if the HC really wanted his guy. besides Synder doesnt control the eagles. I don't think the eagles makes a lot of dumb trades in the draft. They are a bit more savvy than the skins.

You are MOST likely 100% correct. But we know Kelly loves his PAC12 guys and he want a QB that can run his read option. I seriously doubt Philly makes this trade but there's talk about it for a reason.

pools · Post #10 » by **pools** » Sat Jan 3, 2015 12:42 am

not the best example but 2013
rams traded for #8 and #71
gave bills
#16, 46, 78, 222

Closer 21 positions
Falcons got #6 Julio Jones for
#27, 59, 124 and a 1st and 4th the next season

Manster7588 · Post #11 » by **Manster7588** » Sat Jan 3, 2015 1:29 am

pools wrote:not the best example but 2013
rams traded for #8 and #71
gave bills
#16, 46, 78, 222

Closer 21 positions
Falcons got #6 Julio Jones for
#27, 59, 124 and a 1st and 4th the next season

Moving up to two for a coaches dream QB will cost more than moving to 6 for a RW. Your first example isn't a equal comparison but it was still an expensive trade to move up from 16 to 8.

Jarntt · Post #12 » by **Jarntt** » Sat Jan 3, 2015 4:14 am

pools wrote:not the best example but 2013
rams traded for #8 and #71
gave bills
#16, 46, 78, 222

Closer 21 positions
Falcons got #6 Julio Jones for
#27, 59, 124 and a 1st and 4th the next season

The value grows as you move towards the #1 pick. To get from #6 to #1 likely costs you pick #6, the next years first rounder and probably more. You want to move up to #6 with a package like that and I'll say there's a chance, but not for the number 1 pick...