ImageImageImageImage

Impressive

Moderator: Texas Chuck

Manster7588
Senior
Posts: 584
And1: 28
Joined: Oct 17, 2014
       

Re: Impressive 

Post#21 » by Manster7588 » Tue Nov 11, 2014 7:36 am

ncmalko1 wrote:Jeez your just tumbling into the dumpster. I never posted that on your page, I posted that on MY page that you went and read. But, you sure posted on my page. Oh, I posted that same thing on Hoopla, not here and everyone agreed with me for the most part. I think you need to figure out facebook first and what running up a score is 2nd.

Oh lord, throw this guy a bone and let Dallas beat Philly, PLEASE. Some people arent strong enough to separate real life from football. Im complete confident that the Eagles arent winning the SB lord cause we are at least 2 years away from contending... but lord, I dont think this guy can handle the Eagles winning a stupid game.


What you posted hit my page. That's the only reason I responded.
Jarntt
Senior
Posts: 555
And1: 37
Joined: Oct 30, 2014

Re: Impressive 

Post#22 » by Jarntt » Tue Nov 11, 2014 3:38 pm

Malko, I've never had a problem with you, but you have to admit that even though there are people on here that didn't get along with others on previous boards, there was no drama other than that associated with you. At least take some responsibility for that.
ncmalko1
Junior
Posts: 399
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 22, 2014
   

Re: Impressive 

Post#23 » by ncmalko1 » Tue Nov 11, 2014 11:03 pm

I guess Jarntt. I just started talking about not believing BJJ new persona. But then I did say I agree that I should drop it, then Manster came after me. So, I will take responsibility with BJJ but not Manster. I havent said a thing about BJJ since I was asked to stop. People are coming after me Jarntt. Its not the other way around. Ill drop everything and not respond to anything even when someone is COMPLETELY wrong about the Eagles running up the score and not even understanding how freaking facebook works. Its gonna be hard to just talk football even though thats what we want. People are ALWAYS going to post nonsense and be called out for it. But Ill try my best to stay on the positive to keep this board good.
Manster7588
Senior
Posts: 584
And1: 28
Joined: Oct 17, 2014
       

Re: Impressive 

Post#24 » by Manster7588 » Tue Nov 11, 2014 11:46 pm

ncmalko1 wrote:I guess Jarntt. I just started talking about not believing BJJ new persona. But then I did say I agree that I should drop it, then Manster came after me. So, I will take responsibility with BJJ but not Manster. I havent said a thing about BJJ since I was asked to stop. People are coming after me Jarntt. Its not the other way around. Ill drop everything and not respond to anything even when someone is COMPLETELY wrong about the Eagles running up the score and not even understanding how freaking facebook works. Its gonna be hard to just talk football even though thats what we want. People are ALWAYS going to post nonsense and be called out for it. But Ill try my best to stay on the positive to keep this board good.

Really? All I said after you defended Kelly's play calling was if he gets he's next QB hurt you'd be screaming about it. I then said if you State otherwise you'd be a damn liar. Meaning I believe you would be in an up rage over the same way he called this game. It was you calling me a Nimrod and FB stalker hinting I was all over your FB degrading the Eagles. Funny it was you calling the end to Dallas season but toy act as though it was I starting on your board. Keep pointing that finger. I know where the other three point. I can fix the whole FB disrespect my team thing though.
Manster7588
Senior
Posts: 584
And1: 28
Joined: Oct 17, 2014
       

Re: Impressive 

Post#25 » by Manster7588 » Tue Nov 11, 2014 11:50 pm

I no longer have to see a FB post calling for the end of Dallas season from a person who doesn't want that same message about his team.
:banghead:
ncmalko1
Junior
Posts: 399
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 22, 2014
   

Re: Impressive 

Post#26 » by ncmalko1 » Wed Nov 12, 2014 12:31 am

I said "IF" they lose the season will be over. Then I go on to say on Hoopla the same exact thing and saying, "Dallas WONT lose even if Jerry Jones QB's for the team. I wasnt ripping Dallas I was saying if they go on a 3 game skid before their bye while also losing to the worst team in the league they are done. Go look again and see the Cowboy posters agreeing with me. I didnt say Dallas will lose, in fact I said they will win. Thats a big difference from what you said, NO?
ncmalko1
Junior
Posts: 399
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 22, 2014
   

Re: Impressive 

Post#27 » by ncmalko1 » Wed Nov 12, 2014 12:34 am

Face it dude. You lost your cool last night and now youre trying to say things I NEVER said. What I did say is, "DALLAS WILL WIN". I hate when people change your words in an attempt to win an argument. Nice try and I find it funny that you were calling me a liar last night. IRONY?
Manster7588
Senior
Posts: 584
And1: 28
Joined: Oct 17, 2014
       

Re: Impressive 

Post#28 » by Manster7588 » Wed Nov 12, 2014 2:46 am

ncmalko1 wrote:Face it dude. You lost your cool last night and now youre trying to say things I NEVER said. What I did say is, "DALLAS WILL WIN". I hate when people change your words in an attempt to win an argument. Nice try and I find it funny that you were calling me a liar last night. IRONY?


I didn't change your words. I QUOTED you exactly. I didn't bring up FB, you did.

The only thing you can accuse me of saying that you can even slightly challenge is my saying you would have went nuts about the play calling had Sanchez gotten hurt. Now I stand by my belief that you and every other Eagle fan would have went ballistic if that happens. But you want to defend the way he called that game. Sorry but 37 passes to 23 runs with that lead is flat out DUMB. Anyone with a slight idea about football would agree. There become a tome when eating clock is more important than points. Had the Panthers had 21 points I wouldn't argue the play calls. I'm not even arguing Sanchez being in the game. At 31-7 Chip could run the ball 3 and out punt and as long as you don't give up 80 yard bombs the Eagles win that game with no major risk of injury to their QB, WR's or TE.

I noticed you never answered my question. At what point did Celek hurt his ankle?
Manster7588
Senior
Posts: 584
And1: 28
Joined: Oct 17, 2014
       

Re: Impressive 

Post#29 » by Manster7588 » Wed Nov 12, 2014 2:52 am

ncmalko1 wrote:Face it dude. You lost your cool last night and now youre trying to say things I NEVER said. What I did say is, "DALLAS WILL WIN". I hate when people change your words in an attempt to win an argument. Nice try and I find it funny that you were calling me a liar last night. IRONY?



Here's where I used the term liar.

"Throwing the ball as much as he did with the lead he had is a college Coach trying for style points trying to impress the voters. Had Sanchez gotten hurt you and 100,000 Eagle fans would be screaming from the top of your lungs that CHIP needs to run out clock. If you state otherwise you are a damn liar."

Now honest answer would you be up in arms if Sanchez had gotten hurt up 31-7 ?

Come on now any answer you give supports my side of the argument.
ncmalko1
Junior
Posts: 399
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 22, 2014
   

Re: Impressive 

Post#30 » by ncmalko1 » Wed Nov 12, 2014 3:44 am

So we were up 31-7 early in the 3rd. I guess Chip should have kneeled on the ball with Barkley in for the last 25 minutes of the game?

I guess Green Bay should have benched Rodgers in the 2nd quarter after his 6th TD?

Interestingly Romo (with a broken back) was also up 31-7 in the 3rd just like the Eagles. Romo came out with 6:42 left in the 4th. Freaking Garrett is always trying to run up the score trying to get style points. Its incredible how completely identical that Chip did the same EXACT thing with his starter as Garrett did with the same EXACT score.

OWNED!
ncmalko1
Junior
Posts: 399
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 22, 2014
   

Re: Impressive 

Post#31 » by ncmalko1 » Wed Nov 12, 2014 3:51 am

Dallas was up 31-7 in the fourth and threw the ball with 9:34 left in the game. Up 31-7 with 8:46 left Romo throws the ball yet again and gets sacked. Why would you have your starting QB in the game up 31-7 with 8 minutes left in the game? You see thats the problem with Garrett. 100,000 Cowboy fans would be calling for Garretts head if he got hurt on that sack with 8 minutes to go up 31-7. Like I said, Garret always trying to get style points by running up the score and youre a damn liar if you think you wouldn't.

TOO FREAKING EASY!
Romotodez
Pro Prospect
Posts: 802
And1: 12
Joined: Oct 20, 2014
   

Re: Impressive 

Post#32 » by Romotodez » Wed Nov 12, 2014 4:21 am

It was surprising to me to see Rodgers only play 2 series in the second half the other night. I think coaches take pride in their half time adjustments. McCarthey came out and said we want to punch them in the mouth and then take him out. Well they didn't. Same with dallas , they looked bad the second half. I think GArrett wanted to see them drive the football. DEZ was in the lockeroom with cramps, WIlliams had played like crap- I think he wanted to get him going a little and it didn't work. WItten was droppingg passes, MUrray was losing yards and Romo's back didn't look the same. MUrray had 16 carries for 99 yrds. He ended with 19 for 100. I don't know if there is a record or not for total number of games with 100. We have blown bigger leads before so nothing is for sure safe with us. Philly- I was a little shocked to see them throw so much considering Oregon loves to run the ball. I think he wanted to give Sanchez as much work as possible. It did have to chap their ass though that Newton picked up 2 garbage scores , much like Eli and Cutler have all yr.
ncmalko1
Junior
Posts: 399
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 22, 2014
   

Re: Impressive 

Post#33 » by ncmalko1 » Wed Nov 12, 2014 4:34 am

Yeah man, I agree. Lost in all the "hoopla" in Philly is that Sanchez really didnt lead us to many successful drives. It felt like Chip wanted to get him going. But I think Dallas, Philly and GB handled everything correctly (outside of Chip not calling Manster to double check his fantasy team).

Its always like this. Back in 2004 when Philly was 13-1 Andy Reid got ripped for benching everyone the last two games. People were saying McNabb would have 4 weeks off til his 1st playoff game and might be rusty. I remember Reid saying, "Im going to take a lot of heat for sitting my starters but I'd take WAY more heat if someone got hurt during two meaningless games.
Romotodez
Pro Prospect
Posts: 802
And1: 12
Joined: Oct 20, 2014
   

Re: Impressive 

Post#34 » by Romotodez » Wed Nov 12, 2014 4:45 am

I will say it didn't surprise me to see Matthews go off last night. Sanchez probably gets more work with him than anyone. I also thought it was interesting to hear Gruden talk about the backups getting 30 percent of the snaps during the week. Instead of 12 play periods, they go 18 because of the tempo.
Manster7588
Senior
Posts: 584
And1: 28
Joined: Oct 17, 2014
       

Re: Impressive 

Post#35 » by Manster7588 » Wed Nov 12, 2014 5:15 am

[quote"ncmalko1"]So we were up 31-7 early in the 3rd. I guess Chip should have kneeled on the ball with Barkley in for the last 25 minutes of the game?

I guess Green Bay should have benched Rodgers in the 2nd quarter after his 6th TD?

Interestingly Romo (with a broken back) was also up 31-7 in the 3rd just like the Eagles. Romo came out with 6:42 left in the 4th. Freaking Garrett is always trying to run up the score trying to get style points. Its incredible how completely identical that Chip did the same EXACT thing with his starter as Garrett did with the same EXACT score.

OWNED![/quote]

OWNED??????? Here's the problem. I wasn't able to watch the Dallas game. If I did and saw Romo in the game at that stage I've have been livid, especially if I saw the sack he took when he had no reason to be in the game. Garrett played Romo too long no other way to see it. I wouldn't call for any starter to come out in the first half, and Rodgers came out of the game with 11 minutes left in the 3rd Qtr, Not 8:08 left in the 4th (Sanchez) or 8:48 in the 4th (Romo).

Garrett made a mistake and got away with it, so did Kelly. Difference is I can admit it. You know if Kelly does that in the future and you lose Sanchez you have to nod your head in agreement with Kelly.

By the way Romo 27 pass attempts. Rodgers 27 pass attempts, Sanchez 37 pass attempts. Do you see a pattern.

I can't speak for Romo's late passes but I know Rodgers late passes were short safe passes, while Kelly had the Eagles throwing deep.

He needs to learn ball control if he want to be a successful NFL coach.
Romotodez
Pro Prospect
Posts: 802
And1: 12
Joined: Oct 20, 2014
   

Re: Impressive 

Post#36 » by Romotodez » Wed Nov 12, 2014 6:57 am

Not in the argument here but Romo was 4 for 6 for 24 yds in second half. Somewhere around there any way I just know he 16 for 21 for 225 at half.
Jarntt
Senior
Posts: 555
And1: 37
Joined: Oct 30, 2014

Re: Impressive 

Post#37 » by Jarntt » Wed Nov 12, 2014 2:24 pm

After the 31-7 lead and a QB with all kinds of back injuries, IMO the Cowboys were dumb to throw the ball on 5 out of the next 9 plays until they sat Romo. I'd have gone 2 runs and a pass (if needed) from there on out...
Romotodez
Pro Prospect
Posts: 802
And1: 12
Joined: Oct 20, 2014
   

Re: Impressive 

Post#38 » by Romotodez » Wed Nov 12, 2014 3:49 pm

Jarntt wrote:After the 31-7 lead and a QB with all kinds of back injuries, IMO the Cowboys were dumb to throw the ball on 5 out of the next 9 plays until they sat Romo. I'd have gone 2 runs and a pass (if needed) from there on out...


They probably did. Romo may have checked out to a pass. He made reference to how good Terrance Wiiams looked during the week of practice. He was catchless . I did like the play where Witten dropped the ball. I don't know why we ran the play at that time and didn't save it for a later game because it was a nice pattern
CarlHoudini
Freshman
Posts: 69
And1: 2
Joined: Nov 01, 2014
 

Re: Impressive 

Post#39 » by CarlHoudini » Wed Nov 12, 2014 4:20 pm

So anyways, I don't know how much you take away from the MNF game, considering how weak the Panthers are this year. The Eagles looked good against them, as they should have. Let's see how the rest of this month unfolds.
PDay8810
Junior
Posts: 406
And1: 22
Joined: Oct 18, 2014
   

Re: Impressive 

Post#40 » by PDay8810 » Wed Nov 12, 2014 4:36 pm

CarlHoudini wrote:So anyways, I don't know how much you take away from the MNF game, considering how weak the Panthers are this year. The Eagles looked good against them, as they should have. Let's see how the rest of this month unfolds.

I agree. Much still left to see.

Return to Dallas Cowboys