Otis Driftwood wrote:And for the record…
Full no trade clause.
It doesn't have to be now.
All I'm saying is there will be takers if Dak is made available.
Moderator: Texas Chuck
Otis Driftwood wrote:And for the record…
Full no trade clause.
Fierce1 wrote:Otis Driftwood wrote:And for the record…
Full no trade clause.
It doesn't have to be now.
Fierce1 wrote: All I'm saying is there will be takers if Dak is made available.
Otis Driftwood wrote:Fierce1 wrote:Otis Driftwood wrote:And for the record…
Full no trade clause.
It doesn't have to be now.
Don’t even know what you’re saying here…Fierce1 wrote: All I'm saying is there will be takers if Dak is made available.
The ONLY way he is available is if they cut him. And they won’t cut him because that would be Salary Cap suicide. Bottom line is he’s here for at least the next 3 years at a minimum. More likely 4 or 5.
Otis Driftwood wrote:Fierce1 wrote:There will be takers for Dak if Jerry trades him.
Why would Jerry trade him when he went out of is way to sign him before the season started?
He knew what he was doing.
And - feel free to tell me what QB deficient team would invest in $60M a year at this point?
He’s here for at least the next 2 years. The dead money pretty much mandates it.
Fierce1 wrote:Guess as long as Jerry is calling shots, we might as well embrace the suck!
Otis Driftwood wrote:7-10
Otis Driftwood wrote:Otis Driftwood wrote:7-10
I may have been overly enthusiastic
Micah Prescott wrote:bluejerseyjinx wrote:Micah Prescott wrote:Okay, so it's a bet then?
I don't know how to do all that avatar crap, but how about a case of beer instead?
I see. How about this then. The loser has to create a thread in the NFL General forum that is titled "Micah Prescott/bluejerseyjinx's insight into the NFL is superior to mine " and the body of the thread just says "Let's discuss".
Mr B wrote:Otis Driftwood wrote:Otis Driftwood wrote:7-10
I may have been overly enthusiastic
I believe I said they would start out 2-7. Looks like they will likely could go 3-10 8 going into Thanksgiving against the Giants.
bluejerseyjinx wrote:Micah Prescott wrote:bluejerseyjinx wrote:I don't know how to do all that avatar crap, but how about a case of beer instead?
I see. How about this then. The loser has to create a thread in the NFL General forum that is titled "Micah Prescott/bluejerseyjinx's insight into the NFL is superior to mine " and the body of the thread just says "Let's discuss".
![]()
Fierce1 wrote:Future looks bleak for the Cowboys.
Micah Prescott wrote:Fierce1 wrote:Future looks bleak for the Cowboys.
Otis Driftwood wrote:Micah Prescott wrote:Fierce1 wrote:Future looks bleak for the Cowboys.
And after 3 years (when he will be 75)… then what?
Otis Driftwood wrote:Micah Prescott wrote:Fierce1 wrote:Future looks bleak for the Cowboys.
And after 3 years (when he will be 75)… then what?
Fierce1 wrote:Otis Driftwood wrote:
And after 3 years (when he will be 75)… then what?
Worry about it when we get there.
Otis Driftwood wrote:Fierce1 wrote:Otis Driftwood wrote:
And after 3 years (when he will be 75)… then what?
Worry about it when we get there.
"Worry about it when we get there” is how we got here.