ImageImageImageImage

losing a superbowl sucks.

Moderator: Texas Chuck

User avatar
Schmoopy1000
Junior
Posts: 421
And1: 18
Joined: Oct 18, 2014
   

losing a superbowl sucks. 

Post#1 » by Schmoopy1000 » Mon Feb 2, 2015 3:57 am

So anytime your team loses a super bowl sucks

Losing a superbowl because a team came back from behind has to suck a lil more.

Losing a supwerbowl that you should have won. Has to really suck.

Losing a supwebowl because you had given it away has to be one of the worst.

Doing it with what might be the stupidest call in superbowl history........ man I am so glad I am not a Seattle fan. That would be hard to stomach.
Jarntt
Senior
Posts: 555
And1: 37
Joined: Oct 30, 2014

Re: losing a superbowl sucks. 

Post#2 » by Jarntt » Mon Feb 2, 2015 1:30 pm

Why doesn't any of the blame go to Wilson? I haven't heard one person really blame him at all. I'm not saying I agree with the call because it was stupid, but Wilson threw the ball. He needs to at least share the blame. Imagine if it was Romo??? The entire post game reports would have changed to Romo chokes, but Wilson gets a bye? I call bull ****.
Manster7588
Senior
Posts: 584
And1: 28
Joined: Oct 17, 2014
       

Re: losing a superbowl sucks. 

Post#3 » by Manster7588 » Mon Feb 2, 2015 2:13 pm

Agree. If that pass is 1 foot to the right, it would have been in target and the DB wouldn't have had a shot at it. I was playing the what if it was Romo in my head last night. I guess Wilson gets a pass because of last year, but Romo would be getting the loins share of the blame.
Romotodez
Pro Prospect
Posts: 802
And1: 12
Joined: Oct 20, 2014
   

Re: losing a superbowl sucks. 

Post#4 » by Romotodez » Mon Feb 2, 2015 3:16 pm

I'm hearing more blame to Lockett than Wilson. I'm not sure what else Lockett was suppose to do. He didn't see that guy coming.
Jarntt
Senior
Posts: 555
And1: 37
Joined: Oct 30, 2014

Re: losing a superbowl sucks. 

Post#5 » by Jarntt » Mon Feb 2, 2015 3:37 pm

Manster7588 wrote:Agree. If that pass is 1 foot to the right, it would have been in target and the DB wouldn't have had a shot at it. I was playing the what if it was Romo in my head last night. I guess Wilson gets a pass because of last year, but Romo would be getting the loins share of the blame.


Or throw it earlier or just throw it out of the back of the end zone. I'm not absolving the play calling from blame, but I'm also not laying the entire blame on the OC. All of you know my thoughts about ramming it down the defenses throat at the goal line and I obviosuly would have called a run hteir myself, but if you execute right and throw it away if need be you can really call any play on 2nd down.
PDay8810
Junior
Posts: 406
And1: 22
Joined: Oct 18, 2014
   

Re: losing a superbowl sucks. 

Post#6 » by PDay8810 » Mon Feb 2, 2015 3:40 pm

They'd burn down Dallas if that had been Garrett & Romo
RJ MacReady1
Sophomore
Posts: 169
And1: 6
Joined: Oct 22, 2014
 

Re: losing a superbowl sucks. 

Post#7 » by RJ MacReady1 » Mon Feb 2, 2015 3:49 pm

Jarntt wrote:Why doesn't any of the blame go to Wilson? I haven't heard one person really blame him at all. I'm not saying I agree with the call because it was stupid, but Wilson threw the ball. He needs to at least share the blame. Imagine if it was Romo??? The entire post game reports would have changed to Romo chokes, but Wilson gets a bye? I call bull ****.



Dude, They won't even say Wilson's name today. They just won't say his name.
Yea, for Cowboys fans this is real tough to listen to today. You throw a ball that is that high and it was "just a great defensive play"?

Take a look at the int Romo threw in that great game vs Denver that cost us the game. Danny Trevathan made a fantastic play for that int. Not that anyone noticed because all the blame was going to Romo, which is where all the blame should go for an Int. On the QB.
Romotodez
Pro Prospect
Posts: 802
And1: 12
Joined: Oct 20, 2014
   

Re: losing a superbowl sucks. 

Post#8 » by Romotodez » Mon Feb 2, 2015 3:50 pm

PDay8810 wrote:They'd burn down Dallas if that had been Garrett & Romo



That's why I think it goes on Carroll and the OC. As much as we have hammered - I shouldn't say we because I don't hammer Romo- but as much as many have been disgusted with the play calls inside the 5 on the past- I've never really seen them do that on the 1 yard line. A jump ball or back shoulder to Dez yes. A play action to the Fb or TE yes we have seen that. Yes Williams ran a similar play this season and scored a couple of times but I think that was at about the 5. It just seemed way too congested for a play like that
Romotodez
Pro Prospect
Posts: 802
And1: 12
Joined: Oct 20, 2014
   

Re: losing a superbowl sucks. 

Post#9 » by Romotodez » Mon Feb 2, 2015 4:10 pm

If Wilson does make the perfect throw , Dontae Hightower is getting ready to knock his lights out . I'm not sure he catches it anyway and if he does I don't think he even scores.

Stupid play call. Wilson - bang bang play- not sure what else he could have done, unless he had the chance of audibling out of it.
RJ MacReady1
Sophomore
Posts: 169
And1: 6
Joined: Oct 22, 2014
 

Re: losing a superbowl sucks. 

Post#10 » by RJ MacReady1 » Mon Feb 2, 2015 4:20 pm

Romotodez wrote:If Wilson does make the perfect throw , Dontae Hightower is getting ready to knock his lights out . I'm not sure he catches it anyway and if he does I don't think he even scores.

Stupid play call. Wilson - bang bang play- not sure what else he could have done, unless he had the chance of audibling out of it.



Not throw an interception to some rookie that just came off the street ...that's what else he could have done.
Romotodez
Pro Prospect
Posts: 802
And1: 12
Joined: Oct 20, 2014
   

Re: losing a superbowl sucks. 

Post#11 » by Romotodez » Mon Feb 2, 2015 4:28 pm

True but I go back to the play call. It's a bang , bang play. If executed right Kearse picks 21 and he is never a factor. Too much has to go right for that play to work IMO. It's just stupid. If Kearse does pick Butler then Lockett is going to take a huge shot from 54 and it may bounce up for an INt. As good as the play Butler made, Browner was really good too keeping Kearse from picking
RJ MacReady1
Sophomore
Posts: 169
And1: 6
Joined: Oct 22, 2014
 

Re: losing a superbowl sucks. 

Post#12 » by RJ MacReady1 » Mon Feb 2, 2015 4:43 pm

Romotodez wrote:True but I go back to the play call. It's a bang , bang play. If executed right Kearse picks 21 and he is never a factor. Too much has to go right for that play to work IMO. It's just stupid. If Kearse does pick Butler then Lockett is going to take a huge shot from 54 and it may bounce up for an INt. As good as the play Butler made, Browner was really good too keeping Kearse from picking



It was 2nd down. Why did Wilson have to anything but throw the ball away instead trying to fit one in?
Romotodez
Pro Prospect
Posts: 802
And1: 12
Joined: Oct 20, 2014
   

Re: losing a superbowl sucks. 

Post#13 » by Romotodez » Mon Feb 2, 2015 4:53 pm

RJ MacReady1 wrote:
Romotodez wrote:True but I go back to the play call. It's a bang , bang play. If executed right Kearse picks 21 and he is never a factor. Too much has to go right for that play to work IMO. It's just stupid. If Kearse does pick Butler then Lockett is going to take a huge shot from 54 and it may bounce up for an INt. As good as the play Butler made, Browner was really good too keeping Kearse from picking



It was 2nd down. Why did Wilson have to anything but throw the ball away instead trying to fit one in?



I agree but he should have never been put in that situation. If you want him to throw why not bootleg and give him the run pass option. This play will be second guessed for yrs. Sure the right play is to throw it in the first row. Again I think they were banking on a lot to happen. We will never know this but if Brady is in the same situation, IMO he trusts that Edelman will make the pick and Amendola kill make the catch and he throws it too. Just my opinion.
Romotodez
Pro Prospect
Posts: 802
And1: 12
Joined: Oct 20, 2014
   

Re: losing a superbowl sucks. 

Post#14 » by Romotodez » Mon Feb 2, 2015 5:00 pm

It just happened so fast. Wilson threw the INt - he should take some of the blame -
PDay8810
Junior
Posts: 406
And1: 22
Joined: Oct 18, 2014
   

Re: losing a superbowl sucks. 

Post#15 » by PDay8810 » Mon Feb 2, 2015 5:17 pm

Romotodez wrote:It just happened so fast. Wilson threw the INt - he should take some of the blame -


yes...cause in this sports society it's as much about the goat as anything.

Seattle shoulda been who they are. They weren't going to get 3 plays with 20 something ticks and one time out.
BUT...jumbo package and lynch two times is who they are and what they shoulda been yesterday. Dance with the one that brung ya.
PDay8810
Junior
Posts: 406
And1: 22
Joined: Oct 18, 2014
   

Re: losing a superbowl sucks. 

Post#16 » by PDay8810 » Mon Feb 2, 2015 5:20 pm

either way...if that had been garrett, he would be the stupidest mf' er EVER with 90% of all cowboy fans AND NEVER LIVE IT DOWN!
Manster7588
Senior
Posts: 584
And1: 28
Joined: Oct 17, 2014
       

Re: losing a superbowl sucks. 

Post#17 » by Manster7588 » Mon Feb 2, 2015 8:59 pm

Now while I would have. Ran the ball with Lynch I don't think the play called was all the bad. The outcome was bad, but the world except Belicheat thought they'd run the ball.

Bevel's excuse made no sense. Saying the passed the ball concerned they'd leave too much time on the clock has e scratching my head. Then he threw L ockett under the bus. That dude should have owned up and said they tried to catch NE selling out for the run and the play failed. That rook DB made a great play. He should get the credit instead of us throwing around blame.
Romotodez
Pro Prospect
Posts: 802
And1: 12
Joined: Oct 20, 2014
   

Re: losing a superbowl sucks. 

Post#18 » by Romotodez » Mon Feb 2, 2015 9:56 pm

It was a great play
PDay8810
Junior
Posts: 406
And1: 22
Joined: Oct 18, 2014
   

Re: losing a superbowl sucks. 

Post#19 » by PDay8810 » Mon Feb 2, 2015 10:24 pm

Manster7588 wrote:Now while I would have. Ran the ball with Lynch I don't think the play called was all the bad. The outcome was bad, but the world except Belicheat thought they'd run the ball.

Bevel's excuse made no sense. Saying the passed the ball concerned they'd leave too much time on the clock has e scratching my head. Then he threw L ockett under the bus. That dude should have owned up and said they tried to catch NE selling out for the run and the play failed. That rook DB made a great play. He should get the credit instead of us throwing around blame.


I thought the play called was horrible if you pass...play action and if not that, Wilson rolls
Manster7588
Senior
Posts: 584
And1: 28
Joined: Oct 17, 2014
       

Re: losing a superbowl sucks. 

Post#20 » by Manster7588 » Tue Feb 3, 2015 4:20 am

PDay8810 wrote:
Manster7588 wrote:Now while I would have. Ran the ball with Lynch I don't think the play called was all the bad. The outcome was bad, but the world except Belicheat thought they'd run the ball.

Bevel's excuse made no sense. Saying the passed the ball concerned they'd leave too much time on the clock has e scratching my head. Then he threw L ockett under the bus. That dude should have owned up and said they tried to catch NE selling out for the run and the play failed. That rook DB made a great play. He should get the credit instead of us throwing around blame.


I thought the play called was horrible if you pass...play action and if not that, Wilson rolls


I'm sure there were quite a few better options, and as I said I would have ran the ball rather than pass, but with the deep thought that the Pats would sell out on the run I understand the pass play being called. A fade in the deep corner would have been better too. It's my argument that had the players executed the play better it's more than likely a TD.

Had the play worked the football world would have said it was a gutsy but great call. This after the fact judgment is too strong in my opinion.

I'm just glad Butler made the play that ended the game and sent the Seahawks home losers.

Return to Dallas Cowboys