bluejerseyjinx wrote:Please let it be Penei Sewell or Rashawn Slater.
Ya'll need to address that defense.
Sewell will be long gone when the Cowboys are picking.
Moderator: Texas Chuck
bluejerseyjinx wrote:Please let it be Penei Sewell or Rashawn Slater.
Dominater wrote:Damn Cactus jack takin over
bluejerseyjinx wrote:Mr B wrote:bluejerseyjinx wrote:As long as we don't take a CB with our first pick.
Say what? That’s what they need. Well they need a lot but CB is high on the list. And the best player on the board will likely be a CB. That’s who Patrick Surtain, Caleb Farley, and Jaycee Horn are. One of those three CB’s will likely be the pick at 10. If not a CB then they need to draft the offensive lineman Rashawn Slater. The guy you need to worry about them drafting is the right end out of Florida, Kyle Pitts.
Here’s a story in Jaycee Horn.
?s=21
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
When you give up 200 yards on the ground almost every week, the passing game can wait.
bluejerseyjinx wrote:Please let it be Penei Sewell or Rashawn Slater.
Cactus Jack wrote:bluejerseyjinx wrote:Please let it be Penei Sewell or Rashawn Slater.
Ya'll need to address that defense.
Sewell will be long gone when the Cowboys are picking.
Cactus Jack wrote:bluejerseyjinx wrote:Please let it be Penei Sewell or Rashawn Slater.
Ya'll need to address that defense.
Sewell will be long gone when the Cowboys are picking.
Mr B wrote:Cactus Jack wrote:bluejerseyjinx wrote:Please let it be Penei Sewell or Rashawn Slater.
Ya'll need to address that defense.
Sewell will be long gone when the Cowboys are picking.
Agreed, Sewell won’t make it past pick 5. Slater would be a great pick at 10 however so would one of the CB’s.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
bluejerseyjinx wrote:Cactus Jack wrote:bluejerseyjinx wrote:Please let it be Penei Sewell or Rashawn Slater.
Ya'll need to address that defense.
Sewell will be long gone when the Cowboys are picking.
There is still a possibility someone could move up and make a deal with the Bengals to get a QB. If that happens we still could get Sewell. If not, Slater works for me.
Dominater wrote:Damn Cactus jack takin over
bluejerseyjinx wrote:Mr B wrote:Cactus Jack wrote:Ya'll need to address that defense.
Sewell will be long gone when the Cowboys are picking.
Agreed, Sewell won’t make it past pick 5. Slater would be a great pick at 10 however so would one of the CB’s.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
IMHO I believe it would be a disaster on out part to take a CB with our first pick.
Mr B wrote:bluejerseyjinx wrote:Mr B wrote:Agreed, Sewell won’t make it past pick 5. Slater would be a great pick at 10 however so would one of the CB’s.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
IMHO I believe it would be a disaster on out part to take a CB with our first pick.
Why is that?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
bluejerseyjinx wrote:Mr B wrote:bluejerseyjinx wrote:IMHO I believe it would be a disaster on out part to take a CB with our first pick.
Why is that?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
First of all you know I am old school. I believe controlling the line of scrimmage should always be priority number 1, especially on the defensive side of the ball. I have never in my lifetime seen a team in the NFL ever go anywhere when they can't stop the run. Last year was historically the second worse defense in our history. What good does it do us to take a CB with our first pick when teams can run for over 200 yards every game? I prefer to be one of the best teams vs. the rush forcing teams to be one dementional in the passing game and take my chances there.
Number 2, CB and WR are pre- maddona positions, imho. I've always hated taking CB's and WR's with our first pick. Us taking a CB or WR hasn't worked out for us over the years since Jerry promoted himself to GM. Hopefully Cee Dee lamb works out for us. We'll see. I just have no faith in any of our powers of B having a good eye in this department.
Mr B wrote:bluejerseyjinx wrote:Mr B wrote:Why is that?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
First of all you know I am old school. I believe controlling the line of scrimmage should always be priority number 1, especially on the defensive side of the ball. I have never in my lifetime seen a team in the NFL ever go anywhere when they can't stop the run. Last year was historically the second worse defense in our history. What good does it do us to take a CB with our first pick when teams can run for over 200 yards every game? I prefer to be one of the best teams vs. the rush forcing teams to be one dementional in the passing game and take my chances there.
Number 2, CB and WR are pre- maddona positions, imho. I've always hated taking CB's and WR's with our first pick. Us taking a CB or WR hasn't worked out for us over the years since Jerry promoted himself to GM. Hopefully Cee Dee lamb works out for us. We'll see. I just have no faith in any of our powers of B having a good eye in this department.
I get that but there isn’t a an Aaron Donald in this draft. The best DT is being projected closer to 15 and is not the type of DT you want to be a run stopper. Kwity Paye (DT-Michigan) is a pass rusher. He’s 6’4” 275 lbs. but he’s not a big run stuffer. The Cowboys already have at least two young guys like that in the roster. What they don’t have is a starting CB opposite Trey Diggs.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
bluejerseyjinx wrote:Mr B wrote:bluejerseyjinx wrote:First of all you know I am old school. I believe controlling the line of scrimmage should always be priority number 1, especially on the defensive side of the ball. I have never in my lifetime seen a team in the NFL ever go anywhere when they can't stop the run. Last year was historically the second worse defense in our history. What good does it do us to take a CB with our first pick when teams can run for over 200 yards every game? I prefer to be one of the best teams vs. the rush forcing teams to be one dementional in the passing game and take my chances there.
Number 2, CB and WR are pre- maddona positions, imho. I've always hated taking CB's and WR's with our first pick. Us taking a CB or WR hasn't worked out for us over the years since Jerry promoted himself to GM. Hopefully Cee Dee lamb works out for us. We'll see. I just have no faith in any of our powers of B having a good eye in this department.
I get that but there isn’t a an Aaron Donald in this draft. The best DT is being projected closer to 15 and is not the type of DT you want to be a run stopper. Kwity Paye (DT-Michigan) is a pass rusher. He’s 6’4” 275 lbs. but he’s not a big run stuffer. The Cowboys already have at least two young guys like that in the roster. What they don’t have is a starting CB opposite Trey Diggs.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
How would you feel about taking a LB in the first round? Just curious on your thoughts.
Mr B wrote:bluejerseyjinx wrote:Mr B wrote:I get that but there isn’t a an Aaron Donald in this draft. The best DT is being projected closer to 15 and is not the type of DT you want to be a run stopper. Kwity Paye (DT-Michigan) is a pass rusher. He’s 6’4” 275 lbs. but he’s not a big run stuffer. The Cowboys already have at least two young guys like that in the roster. What they don’t have is a starting CB opposite Trey Diggs.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
How would you feel about taking a LB in the first round? Just curious on your thoughts.
LB is really not our biggest need at the moment only because Jaylon, LVE, and as of right now Sean Lee will all be back. Plus they signed Neal who is moving to LB and is expected to start (ahead of Lee) in the weak side. I do expect they will draft a LB or two at some point in the draft just not in the 1st round. At pick 10 there will be other players that fit more pressing needs.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
bluejerseyjinx wrote:Mr B wrote:bluejerseyjinx wrote:How would you feel about taking a LB in the first round? Just curious on your thoughts.
LB is really not our biggest need at the moment only because Jaylon, LVE, and as of right now Sean Lee will all be back. Plus they signed Neal who is moving to LB and is expected to start (ahead of Lee) in the weak side. I do expect they will draft a LB or two at some point in the draft just not in the 1st round. At pick 10 there will be other players that fit more pressing needs.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
See, I'm not comfortable at all with our LB situation. I see it differently. And don't get me wrong, I love what these players are all about. My kinda guys the way they play and approach the game of football. But Sean Lee is so damn injury prone the past 5 years its getting sickening. And I am also very concerned with LVE's neck issues. Feel like it is going to hamper his career. And when your defense had a historic horrible year vs. the rush, you can be damn sure the LB's had a lot to do with it, or lack there of.
Cactus Jack wrote:bluejerseyjinx wrote:Cactus Jack wrote:Ya'll need to address that defense.
Sewell will be long gone when the Cowboys are picking.
There is still a possibility someone could move up and make a deal with the Bengals to get a QB. If that happens we still could get Sewell. If not, Slater works for me.
No. Dallas is gonna have to trade up to take Sewell. He'll be gone.
bluejerseyjinx wrote:Cactus Jack wrote:bluejerseyjinx wrote:There is still a possibility someone could move up and make a deal with the Bengals to get a QB. If that happens we still could get Sewell. If not, Slater works for me.
No. Dallas is gonna have to trade up to take Sewell. He'll be gone.
Most of the mock drafts now have Atlanta taking Pitts and The Bengals taking a WR. Sewell is now predicted going after us. And if that is true, it would be a great mistake on our part not to take him. JMHO.
Mr B wrote:bluejerseyjinx wrote:Cactus Jack wrote:No. Dallas is gonna have to trade up to take Sewell. He'll be gone.
Most of the mock drafts now have Atlanta taking Pitts and The Bengals taking a WR. Sewell is now predicted going after us. And if that is true, it would be a great mistake on our part not to take him. JMHO.
I think if Sewell is there no way Jerry is passing on him. I haven’t seen their draft board but I would expect that they have Sewell in the top 5 on their board. They’ve been pretty good about just drafting the best player available and he’s there at 10 they’d have to take him.
Back to your other question about LB’s. I saw this tweet. I haven’t researched these guys yet so I don’t know anything about them. I doubt they pick either of these guys at 10 but if they trade down you might want to keep an eye on these guys.
?s=21
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk