SK21209 wrote:DanishLakerFan wrote:Ball so hard wrote:
You, my friend, are engaging in wishful thinking. I doubt you’d put your hard earned money on what you’re saying. You claim the roster is broken, yet you believe a core of AD-Lebron can win it all… don’t quite follow that line of reasoning. Also citing one game against the Bucks in the regular season is largely meaningless.
Maybe a bit of wishful thinking. My general point is that when you have two top-10 players surrounded by a handfull of decent roleplayers that fit together you always have a chance at winning a title, but ever since the Lakers won that title, they just didn't put the right pieces around Lebron and AD to succeed. So its not surprising that they didn't.
The game against the Bucks simply showed what their ceiling was, despite playing with a broken roster.
I'm with you, having just a couple more rotation guys with some size would go such a long way. Imagine if we did the Russ/both firsts for Hield/Turner and Nunn/seconds for Reddish:
Reaves / Schroeder
Hield / Walker IV
LeBron / Brown Jr.
AD / Reddish
Turner / Bryant
I honestly think that 10-man rotation could have contended with anyone in the West. Having Reaves and Walker as your 5th and 6th best players is a huge difference from them being 3rd and 4th. The league is in a bit of a transition period right now, no one has taken the mantle from the Warriors as the next top dog. Maybe its the Celtics but it feels to me like they're really good but not great. Same with the Bucks, they're rock solid every year but aren't the type of team you remember 20 years later.
I agree. Not really sure about Reddish, but he'd for sure be an upgrade right now, since we **** dont have any wings.