Their Big 3 is better than our Big 3
Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb
- 8'sReverse
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,868
- And1: 3
- Joined: Mar 03, 2006
- Location: Southern California~ Watching the only LA NBA team, the Lakers!
-
- TommyTheCat
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,311
- And1: 8
- Joined: Jun 07, 2005
- Location: oregon
rsavaj wrote:The negativity surrounding your board is amazing. Sure, you may not win the Finals, but you're in fantastic shape: your core is young and still growing, you're a Top 3 team in the league, and you have the MVP. The future is incredibly bright.
/bitter suns fan rant.
thank you very much. i agree 100%. if bynum comes back healthy next season, no one will be calling the lakers soft in the middle. i'm thrilled the lakers made it to the finals and i'm still hoping they can pull out a miracle.......................but i can't stop thinking about how much better this team should be next season.
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 100
- And1: 0
- Joined: Apr 20, 2008
Harry Heinous wrote:Legit points receive warnings now?
Anyways, if Bynum wasn't hurt I would probably say Lakers Big 3 of Kobe, Gasol, Bynum > Ray, Pierce, Garnett
do you really think one hall of famer and 2 good players are better than 3 hall of famers, of which none (contrary to popular belief) are washed up?

- eloper
- Starter
- Posts: 2,064
- And1: 82
- Joined: Jul 06, 2004
-
With Bynum in there, all the Lakers need is a SF that can hit the outside jumper and play defense. Battier would be damn near perfect, as would a Posey. Bynum/Gasol/Kobe should provide plenty of scoring, meaning the PG and SF spots should ideally be guys who make their open shots and play tough defense. PG is all set with Fisher, you just need a SF who isn't Lamar Odom.
