the lakers can't really b that stupid
http://blog.mlive.com/fullcourtpress/20 ... ks_25.html
oh my
r U guys serious?
Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb
Re: r U guys serious?
- Lakeshow2417
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,975
- And1: 1
- Joined: Apr 05, 2009
Re: r U guys serious?
I'm not clicking that
Re: r U guys serious?
- snaquille oatmeal
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 16,819
- And1: 4,826
- Joined: Nov 15, 2005
- Location: San Diego
-
Re: r U guys serious?
well, considering that this is the first I hear of it, then no, wii r not serious.
that Odom for Wilcox and Maxiel not gonna happen, but I would consider it for Walton.
that Odom for Wilcox and Maxiel not gonna happen, but I would consider it for Walton.

Forum permissions
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot trade for basketball reasons in this forum
You cannot but I can...five rings!
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot trade for basketball reasons in this forum
You cannot but I can...five rings!
Re: r U guys serious?
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 61,130
- And1: 33,807
- Joined: Oct 15, 2006
-
Re: r U guys serious?
I pity the fool that wrote an article based on 3 posts in a Lakers board. 

Re: r U guys serious?
- Dr Aki
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,712
- And1: 31,974
- Joined: Mar 03, 2008
- Location: Sydney, Australia
-
Re: r U guys serious?
- doozyj
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,795
- And1: 1,842
- Joined: Dec 31, 2007
-
Re: r U guys serious?
No, US GuYs R Not Serious?
Re: r U guys serious?
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,035
- And1: 94
- Joined: May 11, 2006
- Location: Not California :(
Re: r U guys serious?
- blix
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,299
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 14, 2005
- Location: The ATX
Re: r U guys serious?
fine piece of journalism. top notch.
durrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
durrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

Re: r U guys serious?
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 130
- And1: 0
- Joined: Apr 24, 2010
Re: r U guys serious?
i think after that move, the lakers will trade bynum and pau for the collins twins and kobe for harold minor, benoit benjamin and 2 future 2nd round picks...this is a joke..whoever are the 4 and a half laker fans advocating this...take off your masks and show us your favorite ben wallace jersey
Re: r U guys serious?
- DEEP3CL
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,899
- And1: 3,207
- Joined: Jul 23, 2005
- Location: LOS ANGELES,CA.
-
Re: r U guys serious?
Hey paperboy.............get off these forums, we know you wrote the bogus article. Now you wanna come back and read the responses. It would've been more believable if your sign up date wasn't March 13, 2010................and this was your FIRST post ? Yeah yeah paperboy you're good.kaloozulu wrote:the lakers can't really b that stupid
http://blog.mlive.com/fullcourtpress/20 ... ks_25.html
oh my
VETERAN LAKERS FAN
SmartWentCrazy wrote:It's extremely unlikely that they end up in the top 3.They're probably better off trying to win and giving Philly the 8th pick than tanking and giving them the 4th.
Re: r U guys serious?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 2,216
- And1: 29
- Joined: Jul 04, 2008
Re: r U guys serious?
LO for a guy who is 6'7 and undersize. I think I keep LO. 6 points and 5 rebounds. For LO, they better throw a few #1's in and Prince.