ImageImageImageImageImage

Should Mike Brown consider starting Goudelock at PG?

Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb

Michael Lucky
RealGM
Posts: 15,140
And1: 6,789
Joined: Jan 02, 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
       

Re: Should Mike Brown consider starting Goudelock at PG? 

Post#21 » by Michael Lucky » Thu Mar 8, 2012 11:29 pm

What they should do is start Blake and have Goudelock get Blake's back up minutes. Unfortunately that will never happen. Ask Jordan Farmar.
ScramboD8
Pro Prospect
Posts: 757
And1: 2
Joined: Apr 13, 2011

Re: Should Mike Brown consider starting Goudelock at PG? 

Post#22 » by ScramboD8 » Fri Mar 9, 2012 1:02 am

I love this guy but he's not really the kind of PG the Lakers need to start. They need a PG that runs the offense well and that can penetrate and score.
User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 56,660
And1: 23,966
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
     

Re: Should Mike Brown consider starting Goudelock at PG? 

Post#23 » by dockingsched » Fri Mar 9, 2012 3:59 am

Michael Lucky wrote:What they should do is start Blake and have Goudelock get Blake's back up minutes. Unfortunately that will never happen. Ask Jordan Farmar.


yeah, this. then give fisher any minutes that goudelock was getting, cause you know fisher isn't going to get cut out totally.
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
User avatar
snaquille oatmeal
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,819
And1: 4,827
Joined: Nov 15, 2005
Location: San Diego
   

Re: Should Mike Brown consider starting Goudelock at PG? 

Post#24 » by snaquille oatmeal » Fri Mar 9, 2012 5:10 am

dockingsched wrote:
Michael Lucky wrote:What they should do is start Blake and have Goudelock get Blake's back up minutes. Unfortunately that will never happen. Ask Jordan Farmar.


yeah, this. then give fisher any minutes that goudelock was getting, cause you know fisher isn't going to get cut out totally.

at this point i would be happy if we start Jimmy's friend the bartender scout at the pg position.
Forum permissions
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot trade for basketball reasons in this forum
You cannot but I can...five rings!
User avatar
ennui
General Manager
Posts: 9,719
And1: 955
Joined: Feb 10, 2011
Location: I see jigaboos, I see styrofoam

Re: Should Mike Brown consider starting Goudelock at PG? 

Post#25 » by ennui » Fri Mar 9, 2012 5:14 am

snaquille oatmeal wrote:
dockingsched wrote:
Michael Lucky wrote:What they should do is start Blake and have Goudelock get Blake's back up minutes. Unfortunately that will never happen. Ask Jordan Farmar.


yeah, this. then give fisher any minutes that goudelock was getting, cause you know fisher isn't going to get cut out totally.

at this point i would be happy if we start Jimmy's friend the bartender scout at the pg position.


At least he knows something about making shots.

















I'm sorry. :oops:
C'mon, you apes! You wanna live forever?
User avatar
doozyj
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,795
And1: 1,842
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
       

Re: Should Mike Brown consider starting Goudelock at PG? 

Post#26 » by doozyj » Fri Mar 9, 2012 8:50 am

lol. Zing! :P
VIPER8382
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,784
And1: 105
Joined: Aug 09, 2007

Re: Should Mike Brown consider starting Goudelock at PG? 

Post#27 » by VIPER8382 » Fri Mar 9, 2012 12:56 pm

ScramboD8 wrote:I love this guy but he's not really the kind of PG the Lakers need to start. They need a PG that runs the offense well and that can penetrate and score.


He isn't the best in the league for those things, but I would argue that he is better than Fisher or Blake in all of those areas, so until management wakes up he should be the temporary answer.
So Gutta
Pro Prospect
Posts: 954
And1: 60
Joined: Nov 29, 2009
Location: Rancho Cucamonga
Contact:
 

Re: Should Mike Brown consider starting Goudelock at PG? 

Post#28 » by So Gutta » Sat Mar 10, 2012 6:23 am

Gek wrote:Our solution is not to start a rookie, second round draft pick and undersized shooting guard.


Who cares where he was drafted!!!!!! The kid can ball.

No one said that it would be any type of "solution" - you have to go with who's on your roster.

The current starter is a 37 year old!! The guy can't even move his feet. Can't play D. Can't shoot. Can't pass. On probably any other team he would be regulated high-five guy and spot up duty (too bad Walton already has that spot.)

The alternative is Blake, who you think would start based on experience, but Goudelock has a floater that Blake does not. Blake is too timid to shoot sometimes when he needs to.

Let the rookie at least be outplayed by Blake or Fisher, neither of which has happened.

I feel the same way with the Metta/Barnes/Ebanks situation. I have really yet to see Metta earn the starting spot, he's been so inconsistent. Not sure why Ebanks gets 0 PT...
"Put five thousand bucks on the Lakers." --Krusty The Clown
User avatar
Mamba Venom
RealGM
Posts: 17,979
And1: 582
Joined: Sep 07, 2005
Location: California
Contact:

Re: Should Mike Brown consider starting Goudelock at PG? 

Post#29 » by Mamba Venom » Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:12 pm

He should have started Goudlock back in December and the entire time Blake was hurt.

If Goudlock averaged 10 points or better w/ PT, we could have traded he and Drew for D-12. Giving the young talent a chance to shine more would have been my move if I were coach w/ Blake injured for a 5 weeks. Use Fish is the 4th.
Lakers are 22-3 in OT last 6 seasons:Kobe best OT closer!
User avatar
jigga_man
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,151
And1: 2,382
Joined: Jul 02, 2004
Location: ...breakfast table in an otherwise empty room
 

Re: Should Mike Brown consider starting Goudelock at PG? 

Post#30 » by jigga_man » Sun Mar 11, 2012 6:38 pm

Goudelock is a pure 2 through & through. The good thing that Brown has done is not try to make him into something he's not.
Sedale Threatt
RealGM
Posts: 50,968
And1: 45,163
Joined: Feb 06, 2007
Location: Clearing space in the trophy case.

Re: Should Mike Brown consider starting Goudelock at PG? 

Post#31 » by Sedale Threatt » Sun Mar 11, 2012 7:06 pm

Yeah, I'm all for an expanded role, but I think it might be more about trying to ease him into a position he's never played before rather than just throwing him into the fire and risk f'ing up his confidence.
ROballer
General Manager
Posts: 9,711
And1: 2,965
Joined: Sep 06, 2009
Location: Romania
   

Re: Should Mike Brown consider starting Goudelock at PG? 

Post#32 » by ROballer » Mon Mar 12, 2012 8:35 am

Not necessarily starting but I do think he needs more minutes

Right now he's only getting the leftovers after Kobe at SG...I'd want to see him grab some minutes from Blake/Fisher or even go small sometimes(when our SF are useless,which is quite often,unfortunately)
with a PG/Goudelock/Kobe lineup
He needs at least 15 mins a night and he's not getting it.


The rotations are too simple,split between Blake/Fisher at PG,Kobe/Goudelock at SG,MWP/Barnes at the SF and a 3 man rotation in the frontcourt... Kobe never sees time on the floor with G-lock

Wanna see some dynamic lineups,from time to time,some changes,to see how different lineups work
Steve Nash injures his back while carrying bags

Slava wrote:I pulled a hammy while fapping. I won't make fun of Nash.
User avatar
Doormatt
RealGM
Posts: 17,438
And1: 2,013
Joined: Mar 07, 2011
   

Re: Should Mike Brown consider starting Goudelock at PG? 

Post#33 » by Doormatt » Mon Mar 12, 2012 8:57 am

he really cant play defense against.. anybody though. hes too small and simply cant guard 2s, and hes meh against 1s. granted blake isnt much better. i really dont see any reason fisher gets minutes ever. his role/minutes should be totally reversed with goudelocks.
#doorgek
ROballer
General Manager
Posts: 9,711
And1: 2,965
Joined: Sep 06, 2009
Location: Romania
   

Re: Should Mike Brown consider starting Goudelock at PG? 

Post#34 » by ROballer » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:30 am

Iamabeasttt wrote:i think he should start at PG.. he's a decent passer, but he can penetrate and score. the defense collapses on him and even if he misses that floater after penetrating the bigs will be there to put it back in.


Just some stats when he played PG(I'm talking about when he was played a decent number of mins,not in garbage time at the beginning of the season)..he played mostly at SG,but there was that stretch when Blake was out and Morris really struggled,so Brown used him as the backup PG

7 games sample

20,4 mpg 10,3 ppg on 51% FG(28-55) 45% 3P(10-22) 100% FT(6-6)...now his defense isn't that great(neither is Fisher's or Blake's)and he isn't a playmaker(we already knew this)but he is way more efficient and scores a lot more than the other 2 PG's we have

For example,Blake and Fisher score COMBINED just 11,3 ppg and shoot just 38% from the field and 31% from deep...they do have more assists per game(6,8 combined) but they do play a whole lot more and this doesn't really negate their inefficiency and lack of scoring
Steve Nash injures his back while carrying bags

Slava wrote:I pulled a hammy while fapping. I won't make fun of Nash.
B-Scott
Head Coach
Posts: 7,180
And1: 94
Joined: Dec 22, 2005
Location: Los Angeles California

Re: Should Mike Brown consider starting Goudelock at PG? 

Post#35 » by B-Scott » Tue Mar 13, 2012 6:20 am

It seems like Mike Brown is to by the book. He's not as creative as Phil Jackson. Brown thinks because you are a shooting guard than you play that position, because your a small forward same thing.

Phil used to run lineups of Kobe, Farmar, Sasha at the same time with Kobe at SF. Mike Brown could do something similair with Bynum, Gasol, Kobe, Goudelock, Blake at certain times of the game.

But Brown just isnt creative like that unfortunately. If the big three are drawing a lot of attention G-Lock would get a ton of wide open threes and defenders running at him, which would open up his pump fake pull up jumper or pump fake, attack and finish with the floater

Return to Los Angeles Lakers