milesfides wrote:I'm sorry, I don't think you know what you're talking about.
I can live with that...
OT: Stern on Jim Rome
Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb
Re: OT: Stern on Jim Rome
-
Kilroy
- Forum Mod - Lakers
- Posts: 21,603
- And1: 12,316
- Joined: Jul 10, 2006
- Location: The Motel 9 in Vegas
-
Re: OT: Stern on Jim Rome
I can live with that...
Never have rice at Hanzo's house...
Re: OT: Stern on Jim Rome
-
Anklebreaker702
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,946
- And1: 164
- Joined: Mar 29, 2008
- Location: Las Vegas (2nd Home of the Lakers)
-
Re: OT: Stern on Jim Rome
milesfides wrote:"Was the fix in for the lottery" is not a loaded question, because it doesn't have a false presupposition.
If Rome had asked, "Have you stopped fixing the lottery?" or "Have you continued to fix the lottery?" then yes, Rome would be guilty of a loaded question. But Rome simply asked if Stern had fixed the lottery. That's not a loaded question.
And David Stern, as a lawyer, should have known that. He probably did, which is why he resorted to red herring and straw man tactics. Either way, his response was inappropriate to his profession, his position, and the situation.
It was as simple as that to me as well miles
VETERAN LAKER FAN