I still think we could add another knock down shooter at 3
Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb
Re: I still think we could add another knock down shooter at
- Jajwanda
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,611
- And1: 105
- Joined: Jun 01, 2007
Re: I still think we could add another knock down shooter at
I don't know if they like him very much. The other thought I had was Blake+Ebanks for a young PG (lmao Sessions) and then signing Martell Webster for the SF spot.
Re: I still think we could add another knock down shooter at
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 107
- And1: 12
- Joined: Jul 25, 2012
- Location: Riverside
Re: I still think we could add another knock down shooter at
Jajwanda wrote:I don't know if they like him very much. The other thought I had was Blake+Ebanks for a young PG (lmao Sessions) and then signing Martell Webster for the SF spot.
How about we find a way to get jose calderon from the raptors??
Something like a, metta world peace + ebanks + blake.
Then we sign webster
Re: I still think we could add another knock down shooter at
- Jajwanda
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,611
- And1: 105
- Joined: Jun 01, 2007
Re: I still think we could add another knock down shooter at
They wouldn't do it. Have to find a team that has a logjam and a contract that matches up with Blake, that has interest in Ebanks. I still think Charlotte's situation is going to get a little ugly as far as Sessions goes and I'd like to see him back in L.A. as a backup, eventual starter.
Orlando Magic, Oklahoma City Thunder, Atlanta Hawks, Brooklyn Nets and Philadelphia 76ers were the teams interested in Ebanks. Take OKC out and most likely Orlando out. That leaves you with the Nets showing interest (they don't give a **** about salary), the Hawks as a possible solution at SF (who is their SF, I forget), and the 76ers.
Orlando Magic, Oklahoma City Thunder, Atlanta Hawks, Brooklyn Nets and Philadelphia 76ers were the teams interested in Ebanks. Take OKC out and most likely Orlando out. That leaves you with the Nets showing interest (they don't give a **** about salary), the Hawks as a possible solution at SF (who is their SF, I forget), and the 76ers.
I still think we could add another knock down shooter at 3
- Gek
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,024
- And1: 1,807
- Joined: Aug 12, 2004
- Contact:
-
I still think we could add another knock down shooter at 3
Why is everyone trying to trade MWP? I don't want him going anywhere.
Re: I still think we could add another knock down shooter at
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 107
- And1: 12
- Joined: Jul 25, 2012
- Location: Riverside
Re: I still think we could add another knock down shooter at
Gek wrote:Why is everyone trying to trade MWP? I don't want him going anywhere.
well, we don't have to trade him if we can find a starting caliber small forward and use ron artest off the bench to sub in at a 3/4 positions.
I don't want him to be another derek fisher, devean george type situation.
Re: I still think we could add another knock down shooter at
-
- Freshman
- Posts: 67
- And1: 1
- Joined: May 24, 2012
Re: I still think we could add another knock down shooter at
my option is Stuckey, he has bad contract for Pistons, but good for us. Knight is Det future. Stuck is perfect 6th man guard.
blake duhon goudelock/ebanks? 3 team trade? with Blazers?
Stuckey to Lakers
Blake and Ebanks to Blazers
Duhon and Shawne Williams to Pistons
blake duhon goudelock/ebanks? 3 team trade? with Blazers?
Stuckey to Lakers
Blake and Ebanks to Blazers
Duhon and Shawne Williams to Pistons
Re: I still think we could add another knock down shooter at
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 107
- And1: 12
- Joined: Jul 25, 2012
- Location: Riverside
Re: I still think we could add another knock down shooter at
stuckey, jamison and hill off the bench?
we would have the bets rotation in the NBA, but we still lack a wing player.
we would have the bets rotation in the NBA, but we still lack a wing player.