ImageImageImageImageImage

The Horse's Mouth: No Luxury Tax next Two Years

Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb

AdonisDeMarion
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,329
And1: 122
Joined: Jun 22, 2012

Re: The Horse's Mouth: No Luxury Tax next Two Years 

Post#21 » by AdonisDeMarion » Wed Feb 19, 2014 12:29 am

BullsLakersFan wrote:
AdonisDeMarion wrote:with Young and Henry out he was the only one attacking the basket, that what I'm pointing out. Nash getting minutes in any game is beyond stupid. Out with the old in with the new. My point is to give all the young talent time, because the season is already lost. We would need a prime Shaq and Kobe to even get in the post season race now. I'm not worried about him not being there in the future, I'm saying that keeping Nash, Blake and Kaman doesn't nothing for us at all, trade Blake and Kaman for any type of picks. Nobody will want Nash, shut him down and get rid of him in the off-season. I just want to give younger players more minutes.

kinda like the Spurs, they kept the same core but added younger player the fit well around their big 3. Young, Harris, Johnson, Henry and Marshall are those type of young players the Lakers fans have been asking for.


I've never say the opposite, because in fact, I agree with you. The point is the OP started this saying that Manny didn't get another contract 'cause of the tax, or at least that's what I understood; and I replied why I think they let him go. Then all started about Harris and the snowball got bigger. Me saying that he (OP) was overvaluing Manny is because he made it sound like he's some kind of no-miss-prospect, I have no problem with the guy coming back. But let's get over this subject because it has nothing to with the post lol

PS: Reading my previous post again, I apologize if I sounded heated/mad in the reply, even if you answered me very polite.



its all good man we're only here to share our views. I just love how the kid played. I really hope they bring him back tho

Return to Los Angeles Lakers