Lakers(19-37) at Pacers(42-13),Tuesday February 25 ,4 PM PT
Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb
Re: Lakers(19-37) at Pacers(42-13),Tuesday February 25 ,4 PM
- leeprettyp
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,950
- And1: 680
- Joined: Sep 18, 2012
- Location: The City of Champions Los Angeles, CA
- Contact:
-
Re: Lakers(19-37) at Pacers(42-13),Tuesday February 25 ,4 PM
We need Nick Young scoring prowess of the bench... Dont let these Dantoni system numbers fool you.. Bazemore couldn't fill the role that Nick young does

Re: Lakers(19-37) at Pacers(42-13),Tuesday February 25 ,4 PM
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,845
- And1: 225
- Joined: Jan 05, 2013
Re: Lakers(19-37) at Pacers(42-13),Tuesday February 25 ,4 PM
Bazemore get up there
Wonderllama wrote:George/Hibbert = the next Kobe/Shaq?
PG seems like he could be even better than Kobe... IMO.
Re: Lakers(19-37) at Pacers(42-13),Tuesday February 25 ,4 PM
- DEEP3CL
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,899
- And1: 3,207
- Joined: Jul 23, 2005
- Location: LOS ANGELES,CA.
-
Re: Lakers(19-37) at Pacers(42-13),Tuesday February 25 ,4 PM
You're probably right. Nick can get buckets in bunches, Baze can't do that. But we have to be careful how much we pay at least Nick and Jordan, can't mess up the 2015 plan by no means.leeprettyp wrote:We need Nick Young scoring prowess of the bench... Dont let these Dantoni system numbers fool you.. Bazemore couldn't fill the role that Nick young does
VETERAN LAKERS FAN
SmartWentCrazy wrote:It's extremely unlikely that they end up in the top 3.They're probably better off trying to win and giving Philly the 8th pick than tanking and giving them the 4th.
Re: Lakers(19-37) at Pacers(42-13),Tuesday February 25 ,4 PM
- ArC_man
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,982
- And1: 910
- Joined: Oct 28, 2012
- Location: UCLA
-
Re: Lakers(19-37) at Pacers(42-13),Tuesday February 25 ,4 PM
NoseBleedLakers wrote:Lakers slowly but surely separating themselves from the rest of the West for sole possession of last place lol.
Who thinks the Lakers will hit 40 losses before reaching 20 wins?
I think we'll *barely* hit 20 wins before 40 losses. The deciding game will be vs Sac this Friday, will be one for the ages

Re: Lakers(19-37) at Pacers(42-13),Tuesday February 25 ,4 PM
- DEEP3CL
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,899
- And1: 3,207
- Joined: Jul 23, 2005
- Location: LOS ANGELES,CA.
-
Re: Lakers(19-37) at Pacers(42-13),Tuesday February 25 ,4 PM
Not worried about none of these so call streaks being broken, NONE of these teams are playing against the REAL Lakers. We haven't had a complete team for damn near 2 seasons now.
Props to the Pacers though, they're a damn good team who I fully expect to be NBA champs come June. I said that about them before the season started.
Props to the Pacers though, they're a damn good team who I fully expect to be NBA champs come June. I said that about them before the season started.
VETERAN LAKERS FAN
SmartWentCrazy wrote:It's extremely unlikely that they end up in the top 3.They're probably better off trying to win and giving Philly the 8th pick than tanking and giving them the 4th.
Re: Lakers(19-37) at Pacers(42-13),Tuesday February 25 ,4 PM
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,140
- And1: 6,789
- Joined: Jan 02, 2012
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
-
Re: Lakers(19-37) at Pacers(42-13),Tuesday February 25 ,4 PM
At least Bazemore is exciting to watch.
Re: Lakers(19-37) at Pacers(42-13),Tuesday February 25 ,4 PM
- gotokyo
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,150
- And1: 283
- Joined: Feb 29, 2012
Re: Lakers(19-37) at Pacers(42-13),Tuesday February 25 ,4 PM
And the tank rolls on...


Re: Lakers(19-37) at Pacers(42-13),Tuesday February 25 ,4 PM
- DEEP3CL
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,899
- And1: 3,207
- Joined: Jul 23, 2005
- Location: LOS ANGELES,CA.
-
Re: Lakers(19-37) at Pacers(42-13),Tuesday February 25 ,4 PM
1. Bucks 11-45
2. 76ers 15-42
3. Magic 17-42
4. Celtics 19-39
5. Lakers 19-38
2. 76ers 15-42
3. Magic 17-42
4. Celtics 19-39
5. Lakers 19-38
VETERAN LAKERS FAN
SmartWentCrazy wrote:It's extremely unlikely that they end up in the top 3.They're probably better off trying to win and giving Philly the 8th pick than tanking and giving them the 4th.
Re: Lakers(19-37) at Pacers(42-13),Tuesday February 25 ,4 PM
- DEEP3CL
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,899
- And1: 3,207
- Joined: Jul 23, 2005
- Location: LOS ANGELES,CA.
-
Re: Lakers(19-37) at Pacers(42-13),Tuesday February 25 ,4 PM
And on cue Pau mentions the flow is "one on one".
Not surprised this was bound to happen with guys on one year deals and it's only 6 1/2 weeks left in the season.
Not surprised this was bound to happen with guys on one year deals and it's only 6 1/2 weeks left in the season.
VETERAN LAKERS FAN
SmartWentCrazy wrote:It's extremely unlikely that they end up in the top 3.They're probably better off trying to win and giving Philly the 8th pick than tanking and giving them the 4th.
Re: Lakers(19-37) at Pacers(42-13),Tuesday February 25 ,4 PM
- crazyeights
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 8,923
- And1: 2,231
- Joined: Dec 27, 2005
-
Re: Lakers(19-37) at Pacers(42-13),Tuesday February 25 ,4 PM
What happened with Kendall? Only 18 minutes and no points.
Re: Lakers(19-37) at Pacers(42-13),Tuesday February 25 ,4 PM
-
- Forum Mod - Lakers
- Posts: 21,603
- And1: 12,316
- Joined: Jul 10, 2006
- Location: The Motel 9 in Vegas
-
Re: Lakers(19-37) at Pacers(42-13),Tuesday February 25 ,4 PM
I think they were just trying to emphasize other guys maybe...
Never have rice at Hanzo's house...
Re: Lakers(19-37) at Pacers(42-13),Tuesday February 25 ,4 PM
- DEEP3CL
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,899
- And1: 3,207
- Joined: Jul 23, 2005
- Location: LOS ANGELES,CA.
-
Re: Lakers(19-37) at Pacers(42-13),Tuesday February 25 ,4 PM
It's called scouting catching up to reality. Some of the stuff he tries in games leaves you scratching your head. The IQ of this team isn't very high at all.crazyeights wrote:What happened with Kendall? Only 18 minutes and no points.
VETERAN LAKERS FAN
SmartWentCrazy wrote:It's extremely unlikely that they end up in the top 3.They're probably better off trying to win and giving Philly the 8th pick than tanking and giving them the 4th.
Re: Lakers(19-37) at Pacers(42-13),Tuesday February 25 ,4 PM
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,484
- And1: 343
- Joined: Jan 29, 2011
- Location: 1 hour North of Staples
-
Re: Lakers(19-37) at Pacers(42-13),Tuesday February 25 ,4 PM
ArC_man wrote:NoseBleedLakers wrote:Lakers slowly but surely separating themselves from the rest of the West for sole possession of last place lol.
Who thinks the Lakers will hit 40 losses before reaching 20 wins?
I think we'll *barely* hit 20 wins before 40 losses. The deciding game will be vs Sac this Friday, will be one for the ages
lol that game should be interesting. Found some tickets to that game for $15 and I'm kinda tempted to go, but it will probably be a real snooze-fest and I might be better off buying a Costco pizza instead haha.

Re: Lakers(19-37) at Pacers(42-13),Tuesday February 25 ,4 PM
- myersia
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,452
- And1: 788
- Joined: Feb 08, 2011
-
Re: Lakers(19-37) at Pacers(42-13),Tuesday February 25 ,4 PM
I don't know how teams like Sacramento, Charlotte (not this year but every year prior) deal with sucking this bad every year. The lottery sounds exciting, however, it also makes me nervous depending on who we choose. Can't wait until our season opener next year. Hope Kobe is healthy by then. Scary to think that Kobe really will be gone someday.
Re: Lakers(19-37) at Pacers(42-13),Tuesday February 25 ,4 PM
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 20,606
- And1: 1,146
- Joined: Jul 09, 2008
Re: Lakers(19-37) at Pacers(42-13),Tuesday February 25 ,4 PM
I still haven't seen a full game by Bazemore yet due to work but dam does this guy fill that the stat sheet. I'm hoping this isn't Clark 2.0 in that Bazemore is just getting freedom from Pringles like no other coach would give cause I really dont want to see Pringles back after this season.
Re: Lakers(19-37) at Pacers(42-13),Tuesday February 25 ,4 PM
- crazyeights
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 8,923
- And1: 2,231
- Joined: Dec 27, 2005
-
Re: Lakers(19-37) at Pacers(42-13),Tuesday February 25 ,4 PM
DEEP3CL wrote:It's called scouting catching up to reality. Some of the stuff he tries in games leaves you scratching your head. The IQ of this team isn't very high at all.crazyeights wrote:What happened with Kendall? Only 18 minutes and no points.
Thanks, Deep. Was making sure he wasn't injured.