Kilroy wrote:Michael Lucky wrote:Kilroy wrote:
Byron put the ball in a rookie's hands and trusted him enough to keep it there for better or worse... Clarkson's development is a direct result of that trust. Regardless of agenda, you simply cannot make a case for Scott having nothing to do with what Clarkson has achieved so far... It was his job to develop our prospects and so far he's done it...
Clakrson got development time because of all our injuries last year. Scott had no choice but to play him at that point.
There's always a choice...
Clarkson started every game after January 23rd... Lin wasn't injured until April. Price was starting until Clarkson took over... He wasn't injured until March.
Clarkson was starting because he was the best option and despite him being a low draft rookie, Scott recognized that and despite all the calls for Lin, he stayed with Clarkson.
Not sure how this could be anything but a positive for Scott.
How is it a positive that he was starting over Price, nor did he start getting his heaviest minutes until Price was injured. He had three guards at his disposal. He had no choice but to play all of them. Jabari was even getting crazy minutes at the end of the year.