Kilroy wrote:Not trading the #2 or Randle for disgruntled, sure to be a free agent Paul George... That's silly...
There's no trade that makes sense for us right now. George is sure to walk and we don't really need him.
Trading a combo of Randle/Clarkson/28 makes all the sense in the world since it allows you to get him without dipping into your future cap. Actually helps future cap direction since you're not having to make a decision on Randle's contract that would eat into the ability to sign a second star player.
If pacers were to accept an offer like that, which I'd be shocked if they did, lakers have to jump all over it. Too bad I think the pacers might just be better off letting George test free agency.
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore