Could Julius be our PG?
Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb
Re: Could Julius be our PG?
- Sofa King
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,352
- And1: 3,044
- Joined: Jul 27, 2003
- Contact:
-
Re: Could Julius be our PG?
No and you should feel ashamed of yourself.
Re: Could Julius be our PG?
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,782
- And1: 423
- Joined: Jan 10, 2009
Re: Could Julius be our PG?
all hes good for is a few rebounds and push the pace for easy offense other than that, he cant read the defense nor handle the ball well, his 3p needs tons of work!
Re: Could Julius be our PG?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,547
- And1: 4,388
- Joined: Jun 19, 2012
Re: Could Julius be our PG?
LOL I love the other thread about Randle being a C and now this? lol
Randle will be traded if the right trade comes mark my words < if the right trade doesn't come then we'll keep him most likely
either way I'm happy with him being PF
Randle will be traded if the right trade comes mark my words < if the right trade doesn't come then we'll keep him most likely

My Go Team
Magic, Jordan, Pippen, Duncan, Shaq
My Counter
Stockton, Kobe, Bird, Rodman, Dirk
Today's Team
Luka, SGA, Tatum, Giannis, Wemby
Magic, Jordan, Pippen, Duncan, Shaq
My Counter
Stockton, Kobe, Bird, Rodman, Dirk
Today's Team
Luka, SGA, Tatum, Giannis, Wemby
Re: Could Julius be our PG?
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,868
- And1: 476
- Joined: Nov 20, 2005
-
Re: Could Julius be our PG?
Kilroy wrote:dockingsched wrote:Kilroy wrote:I don't think you want Randle being a PG, but that said, I don't see why this subject is so crazy... We've talked about literally everyone else on the team playing PG, why not the guy that had basically the same assists as our 'best PG?"
If you think Randle is anywhere in the same stratosphere as Russell in ability to run point just cause of Randle's apg, you are as blind to Russell's talent as ever.
Watch some easily available vids from lakers film room go see the difference between someone like Russell reading and reacting to the defense compared to someone like Clarkson, much less Randle.
I didn't say any of that... In fact I pretty clearly stated the opposite.
Lakers film room are unmitigated Russell Homers... They have absolutely zero credibility on that particular subject. I can't believe you don't see that.
I guess the standard Russell defensiveness is going to ruin this thread too...
C'mon man... Trying to say that you, somehow, have more credibility than Laker Film Room is pretty laughable.
I get where OP is going with this. Julius has shown to be good at finding guys in the open court, but running an offense is something completely different. You gotta understand offenses, and defenses. You gotta be at least decent as a ballhandler in the pick-n-roll. And... You gotta be able to handle ball pressure while at the same time being able to make the right reads.
I hate to say it, Julius just ain't that guy. Especially not full-time.
Talking about how bad Julius Randle is:
DEEP3CL wrote:... When dudes know ball we're just going to call out what we see period.
Re: Could Julius be our PG?
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,670
- And1: 1,359
- Joined: May 11, 2015
Re: Could Julius be our PG?
I'd like to see if he could do it. I think his lack of a perimeter game doesn't help him in this regard, but having him be PG could throw a wrench in the opponent's game plan.
Re: Could Julius be our PG?
-
- Forum Mod - Lakers
- Posts: 21,603
- And1: 12,316
- Joined: Jul 10, 2006
- Location: The Motel 9 in Vegas
-
Re: Could Julius be our PG?
lake_show wrote:Kilroy wrote:dockingsched wrote:
If you think Randle is anywhere in the same stratosphere as Russell in ability to run point just cause of Randle's apg, you are as blind to Russell's talent as ever.
Watch some easily available vids from lakers film room go see the difference between someone like Russell reading and reacting to the defense compared to someone like Clarkson, much less Randle.
I didn't say any of that... In fact I pretty clearly stated the opposite.
Lakers film room are unmitigated Russell Homers... They have absolutely zero credibility on that particular subject. I can't believe you don't see that.
I guess the standard Russell defensiveness is going to ruin this thread too...
C'mon man... Trying to say that you, somehow, have more credibility than Laker Film Room is pretty laughable.
I get where OP is going with this. Julius has shown to be good at finding guys in the open court, but running an offense is something completely different. You gotta understand offenses, and defenses. You gotta be at least decent as a ballhandler in the pick-n-roll. And... You gotta be able to handle ball pressure while at the same time being able to make the right reads.
I hate to say it, Julius just ain't that guy. Especially not full-time.
Yeah, I didn't say any of that either... I think the basic level of commitment required to participate in an internet forum, is probably to actually read the posts. Beyond that, a basic, fundamental, ability to then understand what you read, is probably a minimum requirement as well.
So how much of that did you read? I'm betting it's all a blur after 'say'...
Never have rice at Hanzo's house...
Re: Could Julius be our PG?
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,868
- And1: 476
- Joined: Nov 20, 2005
-
Re: Could Julius be our PG?
Kilroy wrote:lake_show wrote:Kilroy wrote:
I didn't say any of that... In fact I pretty clearly stated the opposite.
Lakers film room are unmitigated Russell Homers... They have absolutely zero credibility on that particular subject. I can't believe you don't see that.
I guess the standard Russell defensiveness is going to ruin this thread too...
C'mon man... Trying to say that you, somehow, have more credibility than Laker Film Room is pretty laughable.
I get where OP is going with this. Julius has shown to be good at finding guys in the open court, but running an offense is something completely different. You gotta understand offenses, and defenses. You gotta be at least decent as a ballhandler in the pick-n-roll. And... You gotta be able to handle ball pressure while at the same time being able to make the right reads.
I hate to say it, Julius just ain't that guy. Especially not full-time.
Yeah, I didn't say any of that either... I think the basic level of commitment required to participate in an internet forum, is probably to actually read the posts. Beyond that, a basic, fundamental, ability to then understand what you read, is probably a minimum requirement as well.
So how much of that did you read? I'm betting it's all a blur after 'say'...
I completely agree. For that same reason I think you should go back and read the posts. You might have to take a moment and let them sink in for a bit. I mean, they are your posts, so I wouldn't except too much too quickly, but I think it's for the best in the long run.
Don't worry though, after a while it'll start to become second nature to you. At least we all hope.
Talking about how bad Julius Randle is:
DEEP3CL wrote:... When dudes know ball we're just going to call out what we see period.
Re: Could Julius be our PG?
- dAdo dA dEvil
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,630
- And1: 508
- Joined: Jun 27, 2013
-
Re: Could Julius be our PG?
Randle as the starting C then now the PG??? Let's just trade Randle before somebody here thnks of moving him to be the head coach of this team.
Re: Could Julius be our PG?
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,505
- And1: 959
- Joined: Aug 12, 2008
Re: Could Julius be our PG?
Sure then call up Canada and bring in Royce White to be the back up PG. No turnover problems there.
I like my prospects the same way I like my women... foreign- pickIBL
Re: Could Julius be our PG?
- madmaxmedia
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,513
- And1: 7,462
- Joined: Jun 22, 2001
- Location: SoCal
-
Re: Could Julius be our PG?
LOL, you two should talk this over:


Re: Could Julius be our PG?
-
- Junior
- Posts: 300
- And1: 25
- Joined: Sep 20, 2007
- Location: La La Land
Re: Could Julius be our PG?
Julius randle has awesome handles and vision? Please pass what you are smoking this way.