ImageImageImageImageImage

Luke's rotations (Clarkson frustrated)

Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb

larry14r
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,265
And1: 131
Joined: Jun 08, 2006

Re: Luke's rotations (Clarkson frustrated) 

Post#61 » by larry14r » Thu Nov 30, 2017 1:42 am

-Spyda- wrote:Trade
Clarkson
Deng
Randle
Ball



Ball stays orders of Magic.
Kilroy
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 21,603
And1: 12,316
Joined: Jul 10, 2006
Location: The Motel 9 in Vegas
       

Re: Luke's rotations (Clarkson frustrated) 

Post#62 » by Kilroy » Thu Nov 30, 2017 1:50 am

I mean Magic would be an idiot to trade Lonzo Ball... For basketball reasons...
You just don't trade a potential elite, 19yo, rookie PG in the modern NBA... Steve Nash looked like a bust for a few years there too...
That's a hand you stand pat on, not fold.
You either play the hell out of him and hope he finds a way to play through it... Because if he figures it out on his own, he'll be much harder, better and more confident in the long term... Which is what they're clearly doing...
Or you start rolling back his minutes a little bit and dial down the frustration... Teach more and take the pressure off a little... Let him run with the bench guys like they did with Clarkson and see if he shines... This might be something to consider.

But you don't trade him... It would be a bad basketball move and a horribly weak negotiation position to put yourself in...
Never have rice at Hanzo's house...
Showtime:Part2
General Manager
Posts: 8,434
And1: 514
Joined: Jul 12, 2003

Re: Luke's rotations (Clarkson frustrated) 

Post#63 » by Showtime:Part2 » Thu Nov 30, 2017 4:14 am

Kilroy wrote:I mean Magic would be an idiot to trade Lonzo Ball... For basketball reasons...
You just don't trade a potential elite, 19yo, rookie PG in the modern NBA... Steve Nash looked like a bust for a few years there too...
That's a hand you stand pat on, not fold.
You either play the hell out of him and hope he finds a way to play through it... Because if he figures it out on his own, he'll be much harder, better and more confident in the long term... Which is what they're clearly doing...
Or you start rolling back his minutes a little bit and dial down the frustration... Teach more and take the pressure off a little... Let him run with the bench guys like they did with Clarkson and see if he shines... This might be something to consider.

But you don't trade him... It would be a bad basketball move and a horribly weak negotiation position to put yourself in...


you mean like he traded dangelo, a guy who is pretty much on the way to one day being a 25/5/5 player? not that i disagree with you, just saying magic isnt smart. if he is so sure he can get 3 max FAs (the wink), then he has to consider dealing lonzo with deng. if he is oh so sure about the 3 max FAs (lebron, pg, cousins), you do it. but he's probably full of hot air.
Warspite:

Prince + filler for Kobe Bryant
To be honest the way Prince has played and with Kobes injury/age/mileage Im not sure I would do that deal either. Still Prince is more important and he wins the head to head battles with Kobe.
Kilroy
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 21,603
And1: 12,316
Joined: Jul 10, 2006
Location: The Motel 9 in Vegas
       

Re: Luke's rotations (Clarkson frustrated) 

Post#64 » by Kilroy » Thu Nov 30, 2017 4:17 am

Showtime:Part2 wrote:
Kilroy wrote:I mean Magic would be an idiot to trade Lonzo Ball... For basketball reasons...
You just don't trade a potential elite, 19yo, rookie PG in the modern NBA... Steve Nash looked like a bust for a few years there too...
That's a hand you stand pat on, not fold.
You either play the hell out of him and hope he finds a way to play through it... Because if he figures it out on his own, he'll be much harder, better and more confident in the long term... Which is what they're clearly doing...
Or you start rolling back his minutes a little bit and dial down the frustration... Teach more and take the pressure off a little... Let him run with the bench guys like they did with Clarkson and see if he shines... This might be something to consider.

But you don't trade him... It would be a bad basketball move and a horribly weak negotiation position to put yourself in...


you mean like he traded dangelo, a guy who is pretty much on the way to one day being a 25/5/5 player?


:lol:
Never have rice at Hanzo's house...
Tee212
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,782
And1: 423
Joined: Jan 10, 2009

Re: Luke's rotations (Clarkson frustrated) 

Post#65 » by Tee212 » Thu Nov 30, 2017 9:12 pm

whatever JC you had like 3 years to prove yourself. youre lucky to have a spot on the bench. now and going forward this team isnt built around you so deal with it.
Landsberger
General Manager
Posts: 9,146
And1: 2,001
Joined: Jul 04, 2016
 

Re: Luke's rotations (Clarkson frustrated) 

Post#66 » by Landsberger » Sat Dec 2, 2017 9:16 pm

gts1 wrote:let's not put this on Luke.. this comes straight from the FO.


If Walton is taking orders on rotations from the front office then it's directly on him IMHO.

Walton has played with rotations to absurd levels for 2 different front offices so I'm inclined to disagree with you on this one.
User avatar
macNcheese3
RealGM
Posts: 11,214
And1: 6,916
Joined: Jul 04, 2015
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada.
   

Re: Luke's rotations (Clarkson frustrated) 

Post#67 » by macNcheese3 » Sun Dec 3, 2017 2:17 am

While I respect Luke's ability to communicate effectively with the players, his X and O's are a little questionable, IMO.

Return to Los Angeles Lakers