Kilroy wrote: Did you catch the fact that he's talking in the past tense about the 'deadline'? That's because this wasn't the first interview where he initially said he'd be disappointed if we weren't deep in the playoffs in 5 years... He was actually basically saying 'it's a process but I would be disappointed if we weren't in the playoffs in 5 years.'
Then the media made a big deal about it and went to Jeannie for her comments and that's when she said she was the boss and would take action if the team didn't perform. They asked her if that meant she'd fire Jim if they weren't in contention in 5 years, and she said that was within her power...
This interview was about 3 years after that, after the 'deadline' had become set in stone and a thing in the media... It was Jim's first comment about it since I believe, but what was he supposed to say? He was backed into a corner already at that point...
And not too long after this, we signed Mozgov and Deng...
"
Lakers' Jim Buss: I'll quit if club doesn't contend 'in 3 or 4 years'
Son of Jerry Buss puts his job on the line after the worst season in franchise history.
by Matt Moore Apr 20, 2014 "
That's the buyline. Note it's April of 2014. And that this is in response to the fact that we have already just had the worst season in Laker franchise history (Not for long!) Next part:
"
Lakers owner and head of basketball operations Jim Buss says he told his family business during a January business meeting that he will step down if the Lakers do not return to contention within "three or fours years." "
So that wasn't in response to something he said back in the past. It was something he told his family at a meeting about 2-3 months earlier. The next paragraph of the article is the first quote I already posted. The second quote I posted earlier, is something he says almost 2 years later. And he was fired about a year after that.
His quotes are his quotes man.....I don't know what to tell ya. He was given 3 years after that first quote. For the record....we had already endured our (till then) worst season ever. So the guy got about 4-1/2 - years. Maybe 5-1/2. I don't really care.
We can quibble details...this month....that month. But the idea that Jeanie twisted his words.....
Cause unless those reporters are lying....he said what he said very clear.
And for the record...I was really happy when Jim took over. I felt he had a hand in our two titles with Pau. I personally loved the CP3 trade. We got Dwight...and Nash as a plan B to no CP3. <-----yes that turned into a disaster....but we all loved it at the time, I loved the push...the drive to be top-notch. Alot of that was during Jerry....but he was pretty damn old and sick. It would be very unfair to give Jim no credit. And of course Mitch...I don't even gotta say that.
I WANTED the next Buss to carry the torch. So I really don't hate the guy. He was just terrible. Let me say that a little nicer: I think he and Mitch just didn't adapt to the new NBA at all. They were old ideas and plans. They looked the fool to young players, and much like when a coach loses the locker-room....you gotta can him. Right or wrong....he's gotta go. Jim and Mitch has lost the stars. They weren't even willing to give them courtesy meetings at the end.
I don't think Jeanie needed his quotes to do what she did. She might have enjoyed it. She might have sent him a smiley text an hour after tossing him. Who really knows? But it still doesn't change the fact that A) It really needed to happen, and B) Boy did Jim soft-ball that one for her.