Trade for Wiggins if we can't get both max players
Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb
Trade for Wiggins if we can't get both max players
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,865
- And1: 3,879
- Joined: Jun 16, 2015
-
Trade for Wiggins if we can't get both max players
I know this idea is going to get a lot of hate but, lets say we're unable to get both max slots filled, maybe even neither (both Lebron and PG Stay), would it be outrageous for us to trade for Wiggins on the cheap.
Ball-Wiggins-Ingram-Kuzma-Randle/Lopez
That makes us a lot better and there's a few things in his favour
1. He'd be the #1 option (no disrespect to Ingram but Wiggins has been putting up big numbers regardless)
2. Walton has the knack of getting the best out of players (look at everyone we have, he can extract that talent)
3. Wiggins raw talent, he has been touted before this season as a top 5 talent potentially, maybe we help him realise that.
Obviously we wouldn't be trading core pieces to get him in theory, because this for Minnesota would be more about dumping salary than neccesarily the return (Maybe they agree a deal for KCP and we can S&T him out perhaps).
Ball-Wiggins-Ingram-Kuzma-Randle/Lopez
That makes us a lot better and there's a few things in his favour
1. He'd be the #1 option (no disrespect to Ingram but Wiggins has been putting up big numbers regardless)
2. Walton has the knack of getting the best out of players (look at everyone we have, he can extract that talent)
3. Wiggins raw talent, he has been touted before this season as a top 5 talent potentially, maybe we help him realise that.
Obviously we wouldn't be trading core pieces to get him in theory, because this for Minnesota would be more about dumping salary than neccesarily the return (Maybe they agree a deal for KCP and we can S&T him out perhaps).
Re: Trade for Wiggins if we can't get both max players
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,434
- And1: 514
- Joined: Jul 12, 2003
Re: Trade for Wiggins if we can't get both max players
I thought we already got rid of guys that don’t like working hard. Maybe Brooklyn can trade for him and get the all slacker team
Warspite:
Prince + filler for Kobe Bryant
To be honest the way Prince has played and with Kobes injury/age/mileage Im not sure I would do that deal either. Still Prince is more important and he wins the head to head battles with Kobe.
Prince + filler for Kobe Bryant
To be honest the way Prince has played and with Kobes injury/age/mileage Im not sure I would do that deal either. Still Prince is more important and he wins the head to head battles with Kobe.
Re: Trade for Wiggins if we can't get both max players
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,992
- And1: 1,958
- Joined: Dec 20, 2015
-
Re: Trade for Wiggins if we can't get both max players
Spens1 wrote:I know this idea is going to get a lot of hate but, lets say we're unable to get both max slots filled, maybe even neither (both Lebron and PG Stay), would it be outrageous for us to trade for Wiggins on the cheap.
Ball-Wiggins-Ingram-Kuzma-Randle/Lopez
That makes us a lot better and there's a few things in his favour
1. He'd be the #1 option (no disrespect to Ingram but Wiggins has been putting up big numbers regardless)
2. Walton has the knack of getting the best out of players (look at everyone we have, he can extract that talent)
3. Wiggins raw talent, he has been touted before this season as a top 5 talent potentially, maybe we help him realise that.
Obviously we wouldn't be trading core pieces to get him in theory, because this for Minnesota would be more about dumping salary than neccesarily the return (Maybe they agree a deal for KCP and we can S&T him out perhaps).
If you had Wiggins on your team....would you trade him for a KCP s&t? You can bet teams will try and do an enticing S&T with Minn. I'm not against getting him (I'm not super into getting him) but I just think we're gonna have to do better than a KCP sign & trade.
Not "hating" your idea....but I think your gonna need to be a little more realistic about what it would take to get him. There are alot of teams who'd love to get him.
Re: Trade for Wiggins if we can't get both max players
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,702
- And1: 2,964
- Joined: Sep 06, 2009
- Location: Romania
-
Re: Trade for Wiggins if we can't get both max players
Spens1 wrote:
1. He'd be the #1 option (no disrespect to Ingram but Wiggins has been putting up big numbers regardless)
You are **** tripping. I would not take Wiggins over Kuzma, let alone Ingram.
No thanks.
Steve Nash injures his back while carrying bags
Slava wrote:I pulled a hammy while fapping. I won't make fun of Nash.
Re: Trade for Wiggins if we can't get both max players
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 50,842
- And1: 44,879
- Joined: Feb 06, 2007
- Location: Clearing space in the trophy case.
Re: Trade for Wiggins if we can't get both max players
F no. He's had a terrible season.
Re: Trade for Wiggins if we can't get both max players
- Beethoven
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,710
- And1: 4,667
- Joined: May 03, 2012
- Location: Utopian Dystopia
-
Re: Trade for Wiggins if we can't get both max players
Lock this thread up
Kobe Bryant forever
GO LAKERS

I've heard it through the grapevine..NBA gods have already designated Los Angeles LAKERS as NBA Champions in near future. The destiny is real. TRUST ME.
GO LAKERS

I've heard it through the grapevine..NBA gods have already designated Los Angeles LAKERS as NBA Champions in near future. The destiny is real. TRUST ME.
Re: Trade for Wiggins if we can't get both max players
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,865
- And1: 3,879
- Joined: Jun 16, 2015
-
Re: Trade for Wiggins if we can't get both max players
ROballer wrote:Spens1 wrote:
1. He'd be the #1 option (no disrespect to Ingram but Wiggins has been putting up big numbers regardless)
You are **** tripping. I would not take Wiggins over Kuzma, let alone Ingram.
No thanks.
Kuzma isn't better than Wiggins is now on talent alone. Kuzma will be but not right now. The case between Ingram and Wiggins can be made. Fact of the matter is, Wiggins maybe taking the most shots but he still has two other big time players with him. Ingram is the guy and is averaging 16PPG, which is a huge jump but is 2PPG less than Wiggins and both have similarish shooting percentages.
Re: Trade for Wiggins if we can't get both max players
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,032
- And1: 4,128
- Joined: Jun 25, 2014
Re: Trade for Wiggins if we can't get both max players
Id Welcome Wiggins....for Deng
Re: Trade for Wiggins if we can't get both max players
- TylersLakers
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,959
- And1: 2,866
- Joined: Jan 20, 2006
- Location: Winnipeg Canada
-
Re: Trade for Wiggins if we can't get both max players
Hmmm.. I'm not so against this idea. Another guy to grow with the young core. He gets up and down and ideally would be another shooter. With that said, his 3PT and FT% have dropped significantly. I'd take the gamble, however. He's still really young.
But I'm also the guy would love to absorb Nic Batum + Malik Monk into our cap space if no stars come this off-season.
But I'm also the guy would love to absorb Nic Batum + Malik Monk into our cap space if no stars come this off-season.

Re: Trade for Wiggins if we can't get both max players
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,702
- And1: 2,964
- Joined: Sep 06, 2009
- Location: Romania
-
Re: Trade for Wiggins if we can't get both max players
Spens1 wrote:ROballer wrote:Spens1 wrote:
1. He'd be the #1 option (no disrespect to Ingram but Wiggins has been putting up big numbers regardless)
You are **** tripping. I would not take Wiggins over Kuzma, let alone Ingram.
No thanks.
Kuzma isn't better than Wiggins is now on talent alone. Kuzma will be but not right now. The case between Ingram and Wiggins can be made. Fact of the matter is, Wiggins maybe taking the most shots but he still has two other big time players with him. Ingram is the guy and is averaging 16PPG, which is a huge jump but is 2PPG less than Wiggins and both have similarish shooting percentages.
Ingram is a far superior playmaker, defender and rebounder than Wiggins RIGHT now, 20 yrs old, skinny as **** and in his 2nd year.
And Wiggins is not a world class scorer to compensate for this other shortcomings, I'd argue they're close right now and Ingram will be far better beginning of next year.
What does Wiggins do well really?
Steve Nash injures his back while carrying bags
Slava wrote:I pulled a hammy while fapping. I won't make fun of Nash.
Re: Trade for Wiggins if we can't get both max players
- Beethoven
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,710
- And1: 4,667
- Joined: May 03, 2012
- Location: Utopian Dystopia
-
Re: Trade for Wiggins if we can't get both max players
He's good at obtaining a max contract.
Kobe Bryant forever
GO LAKERS

I've heard it through the grapevine..NBA gods have already designated Los Angeles LAKERS as NBA Champions in near future. The destiny is real. TRUST ME.
GO LAKERS

I've heard it through the grapevine..NBA gods have already designated Los Angeles LAKERS as NBA Champions in near future. The destiny is real. TRUST ME.
Re: Trade for Wiggins if we can't get both max players
- Scuall
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,841
- And1: 2,768
- Joined: Jan 05, 2009
- Location: Deutschland Ausländer
-
Re: Trade for Wiggins if we can't get both max players
ROballer wrote:What does Wiggins do well really?
Make money

Re: Trade for Wiggins if we can't get both max players
- dockingsched
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 56,660
- And1: 23,966
- Joined: Aug 02, 2005
-
Re: Trade for Wiggins if we can't get both max players
PKABOOICU wrote:Id Welcome Wiggins....for Deng
Unless I had a third team willing to take Wiggins for salary relief, I would rather keep Deng cause I know I can stretch him wit relative ease.
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
Re: Trade for Wiggins if we can't get both max players
-
- Forum Mod - Lakers
- Posts: 21,603
- And1: 12,316
- Joined: Jul 10, 2006
- Location: The Motel 9 in Vegas
-
Re: Trade for Wiggins if we can't get both max players
The people has spoken...
Never have rice at Hanzo's house...