GAME:80 Los Angeles Lakers (34-45) VS Utah Jazz (46-33) - LOSS - 34-46
Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb
Re: GAME:80 Los Angeles Lakers (34-45) VS Utah Jazz (46-33)
- Crooked-I
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,118
- And1: 2,686
- Joined: Jun 23, 2006
- Location: Eastside Long Beach
-
Re: GAME:80 Los Angeles Lakers (34-45) VS Utah Jazz (46-33)
You know the offense is crap when Channing Frye post ups are a regular occurrence lol.
LAKER FAN FOR LIFE
RIP Kobe and Gigi
RIP Kobe and Gigi
Re: GAME:80 Los Angeles Lakers (34-45) VS Utah Jazz (46-33)
- Crooked-I
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,118
- And1: 2,686
- Joined: Jun 23, 2006
- Location: Eastside Long Beach
-
Re: GAME:80 Los Angeles Lakers (34-45) VS Utah Jazz (46-33)
Lava Rock Kid wrote:TwoStarz wrote:This team is so depleted holy...certainly not the way you wanna end a season
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
I think you are hard on the Lakers, they are the only lotto team showing Promise at this point. Your team doesn't quit and has a lot of good talented youth.
Yes, I know the clippers and nuggets will probably be in the lotto, but they are still playing for something.
Yeah I consider this season a success. These last few games with injuries isn't going to change anything.
LAKER FAN FOR LIFE
RIP Kobe and Gigi
RIP Kobe and Gigi
Re: GAME:80 Los Angeles Lakers (34-45) VS Utah Jazz (46-33)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 50,842
- And1: 44,876
- Joined: Feb 06, 2007
- Location: Clearing space in the trophy case.
Re: GAME:80 Los Angeles Lakers (34-45) VS Utah Jazz (46-33)
It's definitely a bummer Ball, Randle, Ingram and Kuzma only got 30 games together, but yeah, this was absolutely a successful season. Relatively speaking, of course.
Given that we're still not a playoff team, the difference between 34 wins and 40 is a fart in the wind. The main thing is to make sure all these guys have enough time over the summer to really lock in and work on their games and come back even better. We've also got some big financial/personnel decisions to make, and we're going to have to get lucky on top of it.
But for the first time in a long time we're finally headed in the right direction.
Given that we're still not a playoff team, the difference between 34 wins and 40 is a fart in the wind. The main thing is to make sure all these guys have enough time over the summer to really lock in and work on their games and come back even better. We've also got some big financial/personnel decisions to make, and we're going to have to get lucky on top of it.
But for the first time in a long time we're finally headed in the right direction.
Re: GAME:80 Los Angeles Lakers (34-45) VS Utah Jazz (46-33)
- DEEP3CL
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,899
- And1: 3,207
- Joined: Jul 23, 2005
- Location: LOS ANGELES,CA.
-
Re: GAME:80 Los Angeles Lakers (34-45) VS Utah Jazz (46-33)
Sedale's post sums it up perfectly we had injuries that robbed the squad of forming a real chemistry bit that said we had a damn good season.
The thing I loved was we competed every damn game.
This game today was meaningless for us. We have other decisions that are more pressing than worrying when we'll be a playoff team.
But this much is damn sure we're not as far off as media and hater ass fans think.
I see too many people mainly fans of the team worrying about what free agency will be about....let's just let it play out.
If we land something cool if not we're on a good building path regardless.
For the first time in 5 years Im good with where we're at.
Screw the haters...we already know what their sorry reason for hating is.
The thing I loved was we competed every damn game.
This game today was meaningless for us. We have other decisions that are more pressing than worrying when we'll be a playoff team.
But this much is damn sure we're not as far off as media and hater ass fans think.
I see too many people mainly fans of the team worrying about what free agency will be about....let's just let it play out.
If we land something cool if not we're on a good building path regardless.
For the first time in 5 years Im good with where we're at.
Screw the haters...we already know what their sorry reason for hating is.
VETERAN LAKERS FAN
SmartWentCrazy wrote:It's extremely unlikely that they end up in the top 3.They're probably better off trying to win and giving Philly the 8th pick than tanking and giving them the 4th.
Re: GAME:80 Los Angeles Lakers (34-45) VS Utah Jazz (46-33)
- BEazy
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,101
- And1: 2,497
- Joined: Aug 06, 2010
-
Re: GAME:80 Los Angeles Lakers (34-45) VS Utah Jazz (46-33)
Big decisions coming up this summer. Hopefully this is the last season we stay out of the playoffs.

Long Live The Black Mamba. Kobe Bean Bryant Laker For Life. 8/24
Re: GAME:80 Los Angeles Lakers (34-45) VS Utah Jazz (46-33)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,432
- And1: 925
- Joined: Sep 16, 2008
-
Re: GAME:80 Los Angeles Lakers (34-45) VS Utah Jazz (46-33)
Well said both of you. I could not be happier with this season. I wish we could have seen Zo, Hart Ingram, Kuzma, and Randle finish off the season but this off season will be about the guys getting healthy and improving their games.
The important thing is that for anyone who’s been paying attention to the Lakers this season, they’ve done enough to entice free agents. I never felt that confidence going into the off season in the past 5 seasons. If they “strike out” again I won’t be disappointed because they’ve shown that there is a great foundation to build upon even without major free agent signings.
The important thing is that for anyone who’s been paying attention to the Lakers this season, they’ve done enough to entice free agents. I never felt that confidence going into the off season in the past 5 seasons. If they “strike out” again I won’t be disappointed because they’ve shown that there is a great foundation to build upon even without major free agent signings.
Re: GAME:80 Los Angeles Lakers (34-45) VS Utah Jazz (46-33)
- DEEP3CL
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,899
- And1: 3,207
- Joined: Jul 23, 2005
- Location: LOS ANGELES,CA.
-
Re: GAME:80 Los Angeles Lakers (34-45) VS Utah Jazz (46-33)
As far as the Jazz...good team but not a contender. I think I would know what a contender looks like been watching this game too damn long to know.
Last time the Jazz was a contender they had 10 and 32 running for them.....and even then I perfectly predicted their demise to the Bulls twice.
They might win their first round series but nothing is happening past that.
Last time the Jazz was a contender they had 10 and 32 running for them.....and even then I perfectly predicted their demise to the Bulls twice.
They might win their first round series but nothing is happening past that.
VETERAN LAKERS FAN
SmartWentCrazy wrote:It's extremely unlikely that they end up in the top 3.They're probably better off trying to win and giving Philly the 8th pick than tanking and giving them the 4th.
Re: GAME:80 Los Angeles Lakers (34-45) VS Utah Jazz (46-33)
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,146
- And1: 2,001
- Joined: Jul 04, 2016
-
Re: GAME:80 Los Angeles Lakers (34-45) VS Utah Jazz (46-33)
Was out doing stuff today and couldn't see the game. Looks like the SB Lakers took a hard loss to Utah.
Injuries have been nagging us all year. Here's to a healthy 18-19 campaign next year. Also.... here's to a successful offseason that puts us talking playoff seeding this time next year.
Injuries have been nagging us all year. Here's to a healthy 18-19 campaign next year. Also.... here's to a successful offseason that puts us talking playoff seeding this time next year.
Re: GAME:80 Los Angeles Lakers (34-45) VS Utah Jazz (46-33) - LOSS - 34-46
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,865
- And1: 3,879
- Joined: Jun 16, 2015
-
Re: GAME:80 Los Angeles Lakers (34-45) VS Utah Jazz (46-33) - LOSS - 34-46
Can we actually cut lopez. That was the scrubbiest of scrub performances that you could put out.
Glad i didn't watch this one and opted for wrestlemania instead but damn. Did Gobert own him that badly?
Also Ennis scoring 22
This current incarnation of the lakers (without Ingram, Kuzma or anyone really worth anything outside of Randle and Hart) is probably worse than the 76ers at the beginning of the process. If we played this way the whole season we wouldn't have made 10 wins.
Fire the medical staff because these guys cannot remain healthy to save themselves either.
On top of our 2 big name F.A's (or trading for Kawhi, hopefully), we need some depth.
Glad i didn't watch this one and opted for wrestlemania instead but damn. Did Gobert own him that badly?
Also Ennis scoring 22

Fire the medical staff because these guys cannot remain healthy to save themselves either.
On top of our 2 big name F.A's (or trading for Kawhi, hopefully), we need some depth.
Re: GAME:80 Los Angeles Lakers (34-45) VS Utah Jazz (46-33)
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,122
- And1: 3,790
- Joined: May 12, 2014
-
Re: GAME:80 Los Angeles Lakers (34-45) VS Utah Jazz (46-33)
DEEP3CL wrote:As far as the Jazz...good team but not a contender. I think I would know what a contender looks like been watching this game too damn long to know.
Last time the Jazz was a contender they had 10 and 32 running for them.....and even then I perfectly predicted their demise to the Bulls twice.
They might win their first round series but nothing is happening past that.
I like their team though, Mitchell would have to become a harden level player for them to contend, anything can happen he is awesome
Tinseltown wrote:True Story wrote:KD is the best player in the NBA.
Kevin Durant is a better scorer than Jordan
MJ was never this efficient
Re: GAME:80 Los Angeles Lakers (34-45) VS Utah Jazz (46-33)
- Beethoven
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,710
- And1: 4,667
- Joined: May 03, 2012
- Location: Utopian Dystopia
-
Re: GAME:80 Los Angeles Lakers (34-45) VS Utah Jazz (46-33)
DEEP3CL wrote:Sedale's post sums it up perfectly we had injuries that robbed the squad of forming a real chemistry bit that said we had a damn good season.
The thing I loved was we competed every damn game.
But this much is damn sure we're not as far off as media and hater ass fans think.
Damn straight.
Kobe Bryant forever
GO LAKERS

I've heard it through the grapevine..NBA gods have already designated Los Angeles LAKERS as NBA Champions in near future. The destiny is real. TRUST ME.
GO LAKERS

I've heard it through the grapevine..NBA gods have already designated Los Angeles LAKERS as NBA Champions in near future. The destiny is real. TRUST ME.
Re: GAME:80 Los Angeles Lakers (34-45) VS Utah Jazz (46-33)
-
- Forum Mod - Lakers
- Posts: 38,250
- And1: 9,955
- Joined: Apr 17, 2005
- Location: Pitcher's Mound
-
Re: GAME:80 Los Angeles Lakers (34-45) VS Utah Jazz (46-33)
Sedale Threatt wrote:It's definitely a bummer Ball, Randle, Ingram and Kuzma only got 30 games together, but yeah, this was absolutely a successful season. Relatively speaking, of course.
Given that we're still not a playoff team, the difference between 34 wins and 40 is a fart in the wind. The main thing is to make sure all these guys have enough time over the summer to really lock in and work on their games and come back even better. We've also got some big financial/personnel decisions to make, and we're going to have to get lucky on top of it.
But for the first time in a long time we're finally headed in the right direction.

Read more, learn more, change your posts.
Re: GAME:80 Los Angeles Lakers (34-45) VS Utah Jazz (46-33) - LOSS - 34-46
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,702
- And1: 2,964
- Joined: Sep 06, 2009
- Location: Romania
-
Re: GAME:80 Los Angeles Lakers (34-45) VS Utah Jazz (46-33) - LOSS - 34-46
We could get Jesus in FA, I don't give a flying ****....but if Josh Hart is not a regular part of our core guys next year I will go berserk.
Minimum 25 mins a game. Period.
What a damn fine draft we had, I still can't believe it.
Minimum 25 mins a game. Period.
What a damn fine draft we had, I still can't believe it.
Steve Nash injures his back while carrying bags
Slava wrote:I pulled a hammy while fapping. I won't make fun of Nash.
Re: GAME:80 Los Angeles Lakers (34-45) VS Utah Jazz (46-33) - LOSS - 34-46
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 47,741
- And1: 17,306
- Joined: Jul 06, 2014
-
Re: GAME:80 Los Angeles Lakers (34-45) VS Utah Jazz (46-33) - LOSS - 34-46
Pretty much where I wanted and projected this team to be. A improvement for sure
Re: GAME:80 Los Angeles Lakers (34-45) VS Utah Jazz (46-33) - LOSS - 34-46
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,806
- And1: 3,196
- Joined: Mar 21, 2011
-
Re: GAME:80 Los Angeles Lakers (34-45) VS Utah Jazz (46-33) - LOSS - 34-46
Luke Walton deserves a ton of credit for developing some of his guys. Kuzma has been great all season, and for a while now Hart is looking very good.
Lakeshow has really fizzled out lately, but it's due to injuries and not effort.
Lakeshow has really fizzled out lately, but it's due to injuries and not effort.
Re: GAME:80 Los Angeles Lakers (34-45) VS Utah Jazz (46-33) - LOSS - 34-46
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,840
- And1: 1,769
- Joined: Oct 20, 2015
-
Re: GAME:80 Los Angeles Lakers (34-45) VS Utah Jazz (46-33) - LOSS - 34-46
UtahJazzFan88 wrote:Luke Walton deserves a ton of credit for developing some of his guys. Kuzma has been great all season, and for a while now Hart is looking very good.
Lakeshow has really fizzled out lately, but it's due to injuries and not effort.
Thanks for being a decent visitor.
Yeah, I have full and complete confidence that Luke will be a great coach. He’s well on his way. High IQ, good at Xs and Os but he’s also very good at inspiring them; holding guys accountable while making them believe in themselves. The defensive end is looking promising. On the offensive end he has shown impressive versatility given all the lineup changes etc.
You’ve got yourselves one hell of a special talent in that rookie yourselves, btw. Good coach, too. I see many intense playoffs series in our near future.
Since the 1976 merger LAL 11, CHI 6, BOS 6, SAS 5, GSW 4
PG: Luka / Vincent / Bronny
SG: Smart / Reaves / Knecht / Mañon
SF: LaRavia / Rui / Thiero
PF: Bron / Vando / Kleber
C: Ayton / Hayes / Koloko
PG: Luka / Vincent / Bronny
SG: Smart / Reaves / Knecht / Mañon
SF: LaRavia / Rui / Thiero
PF: Bron / Vando / Kleber
C: Ayton / Hayes / Koloko