Nightwing wrote:ever since superstars teaming up and not wanting to beat each other, i'd say yes college basketball is better at this point. so you're exactly right, this is not some college basketball or anything.
what exactly are we losing? a lot. you see, you guys are so in love with the idea of lebron coming here and forgot that he's a ticking bomb waiting to explode. if you're not familiar with lebrons drama antics then i suggest take a deeper look . don't get me wrong, lebron is one of the greatest player ever no doubt about it but signing him at this point of his career, a risk not worth taking.
no one said that we're too good not wanting him, i didn't say that but i love what we build here, i want it to stay that way and start from there. having lebron, he might make it better or ruin it that we don't know but like i said,no sir it's not the risk i'm willing to take as a fan.
what petty? the problem with some lakers fan, if you don't want lebron then you're a passionate kobe stan that don't know laker basketball. really? what's wrong with wanting to beat him instead? what's wrong with letting him win somewhere else and not use this organization for his so called legacy.
no one is beating golden state at this point then i don't get why by not wanting him is petty and snob.
The Lakers won't lose anything by signing LeBron. They're already losing given that they've picked in the lottery for the past several years. Talentwise, possibly Ingram and Ball are worth keeping; we know what we got with Randle and Clarkson. You really think LeBron drama is a reason to not sign him? That's about as dumb as it gets. Signs with Miami, wins 2 titles; goes back to Cleveland, wins a title. Your only argument is his age which would be a good point. But even during the majority of this next contract, he'd still be one of the best players in the league.
There's no risk now because it's a lottery team. There's nothing to blow up. Yea, you got some young pieces but none of them have shown to be that transcendent talent every team covets. Ingram might be that guy. Ball, I doubt it.
LeBron doesn't need the Lakers for his legacy. He's already a top 5 player of all-time; one can argue top 3 or even best ever.