Sedale Threatt wrote:iamworthy wrote:Kilroy wrote:
Yeah, I don't get it either... He may have gotten a little salty about them messing with his role for 2 years, but he still carried the team on both ends of the floor many nights... And I'm sure they were pissed at his agent, but it seems monumentally petty to let him walk for nothing just to spite them both.
But he was kind of a unicorn... A 4 with small ball 5 skills, who could defend from 1-5, but wasn't much of a 3pt threat... It's hard to put a value on that... Although I think NO got a steal.
I guess it just came down to this FO being lazer focused on Kawhi and maintaining the cap space to sign him outright next season.
I just wonder why they didn't have more confidence in their ability to trade for space if they needed it.
It shows the inexperience of our front office. The spurs would never let a guy like Randle walk for nothing. This is a business, even if you gotta massage egos you do that until you can figure out what the next play is. You don't let him leave for nothing. Lakers assistant coaches put in a lot of hard work developing this guy and for what......
Let me preface this by saying that I am also disappointed to see a flawed but obviously talented and productive young player skate, not necessarily because we got nothing in return, although that sucks, but with what we used that salary on.
It's clear that the No. 1 priority, beyond getting LeBron and whoever else this summer, was maintaining flexibility moving forward if that plan falls through. We'll see how that all pans out. But I just do not get the Rondo addition. We already have one point guard who can't shoot, on a team that doesn't really even need a classic PG with LeBron. Why add a second?
Anyways, with all of that said, it would seem that the market for Julius was next to nil. Now, something is obviously better than nothing, even if it's just a second round pick or something flimsy like that. So while that's not a huge missed opportunity, if that was available somewhere then you should take it.
But, and you guys can correct me if I'm wrong, I was under the impression that we shopped him pretty heavily before the trade deadline and pretty much got no bites. Obviously he played his best basketball after that, so his value should have improved. To what extent, I don't know. But it wouldn't seem to be all that significant given the lack of action thus far, as admittedly early as it is in this year's free agent season.
Just all around, it's definitely a bummer. It always sucks to see the promise of a lottery pick, a player you hope can be an essential piece moving forward, not realized. I think pretty much all of us would have been ecstatic if we knew he was going to end up signing for $9 million per, and automatically assumed that meant he was coming back.
But from his standpoint, it has way less to do with the money than the opportunity to play a huge role that he just wasn't going to get here. And from our standpoint, it was less about the money than the years, and being concerned (right or wrong) with Randle's attitude moving forward without that substantial role. (I definitely think the sh*t with his agent is totally overblown. I could be wrong, but with Pelinka having done that for a living, I can't believe he'd allow us to take anything on that front personally.)
So I see both sides. Without having scoured the available free agents to see who I like better, I would just feel a lot better about it if we'd done something different with the money.