ImageImageImageImageImage

Game 44: Cleveland Cavaliers (8-35) @ Los Angeles Lakers (23-20)

Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb

Landsberger
General Manager
Posts: 9,146
And1: 2,001
Joined: Jul 04, 2016
 

Re: Game 44: Cleveland Cavaliers (8-35) @ Los Angeles Lakers (23-20) 

Post#141 » by Landsberger » Mon Jan 14, 2019 11:50 pm

Slava wrote:
iamworthy wrote:
Slava wrote:
I want a porterhouse steak for dinner everyday but I settle for salmon and salad.

I'd offer a protected 1st and if push comes to shove, one of Svi, Mo or Bonga.


I don't think 20/10 guys that shoot close to 40% from 3 come that cheap. I could be wrong though.


He's an expiring contract, unless Orlando plans to resign him, his value shouldn't be higher than a mid 1st.


I get that but to get to the front of that line we might have to provide something to to sweeten the deal like Zubac. Vuc really seems to be a good complement to Bron and Kuzma. Now..... about Ingram.
Kilroy
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 21,603
And1: 12,316
Joined: Jul 10, 2006
Location: The Motel 9 in Vegas
       

Re: Game 44: Cleveland Cavaliers (8-35) @ Los Angeles Lakers (23-20) 

Post#142 » by Kilroy » Mon Jan 14, 2019 11:59 pm

TyCobb wrote:Javale McGee coming back down to Earth after his hot first month isn't getting enough attention.


He's back to what he always was, a serviceable backup big, when you need some athleticism off the bench...

I honestly think Zu is our best fit for starting Big... His combination of size athleticism and skill fit better with our starters than the other 2 guys we have...
I'm not in any way saying this is a good thing, just that I think the reality is, with all the flaws in Zu's game, he's still a better look than shaky McGee, and tired Chandler...

God, I wish we would have kept Lopez/Randle...
Never have rice at Hanzo's house...
User avatar
Dr Aki
RealGM
Posts: 35,675
And1: 31,907
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
   

Re: Game 44: Cleveland Cavaliers (8-35) @ Los Angeles Lakers (23-20) 

Post#143 » by Dr Aki » Tue Jan 15, 2019 12:01 am

BasketballFan7 wrote:
Dr Aki wrote:Problem is that noone who could shoot was even available last summer at a reasonable price

Ariza went for 15 mil ffs


Brook Lopez and Shabazz Napier were both league minimum signings, or right above it.


Don't know about Napier, but Bropez should've been brought back.

That was the biggest mistake this off season. It was crazy obvious that having a shooting big man items up so many more driving possibilities for LeBron, Ingram, Zo, Hart etc
Image
Spens1
RealGM
Posts: 13,865
And1: 3,879
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
     

Re: Game 44: Cleveland Cavaliers (8-35) @ Los Angeles Lakers (23-20) 

Post#144 » by Spens1 » Tue Jan 15, 2019 1:24 am

iamworthy wrote:This is why I stay out of the trade thread. Clearly I think a guy entering his prime with the stats he's putting up is worth more than they really are :lol:


under normal circumstances, yes, but this is only a stretch and he's not locked in next year, so will Orlando pay to extend him.
User avatar
Slink
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,301
And1: 990
Joined: Jul 04, 2017
   

Re: Game 44: Cleveland Cavaliers (8-35) @ Los Angeles Lakers (23-20) 

Post#145 » by Slink » Tue Jan 15, 2019 1:54 am

He got treatment and shots yesterday, he got treatment and shots today,” Walton said. “I don’t know if he ran today.”

When asked if James has begun running, Walton answered, “Yeah,” adding, “He tells me he feels good.”

That James is running suggests a return could be on the horizon. He’s already been ruled out for Tuesday’s game against the Chicago Bulls, and if James is unable to play Thursday or Saturday, the next opportunity would come Monday when the Lakers host the Golden State Warriors.


https://www.lakersnation.com/lakers-injury-update-lebron-james-strained-groin-recovery-running-shooting/2019/01/14/
Landsberger
General Manager
Posts: 9,146
And1: 2,001
Joined: Jul 04, 2016
 

Re: Game 44: Cleveland Cavaliers (8-35) @ Los Angeles Lakers (23-20) 

Post#146 » by Landsberger » Tue Jan 15, 2019 2:25 am

Kilroy wrote:I honestly think Zu is our best fit for starting Big... His combination of size athleticism and skill fit better with our starters than the other 2 guys we have...
I'm not in any way saying this is a good thing, just that I think the reality is, with all the flaws in Zu's game, he's still a better look than shaky McGee, and tired Chandler...


I think he is maximized with Bron and Rondo especially. They both know how to use a guy like him. Oddly enough Clarkson was very good with him too. I'd love to see him start but Luke seems to be stuck in players roles and positions.
BasketballFan7
Analyst
Posts: 3,668
And1: 2,344
Joined: Mar 11, 2015
   

Re: Game 44: Cleveland Cavaliers (8-35) @ Los Angeles Lakers (23-20) 

Post#147 » by BasketballFan7 » Tue Jan 15, 2019 9:14 am

Dr Aki wrote:
BasketballFan7 wrote:
Dr Aki wrote:Problem is that noone who could shoot was even available last summer at a reasonable price

Ariza went for 15 mil ffs


Brook Lopez and Shabazz Napier were both league minimum signings, or right above it.


Don't know about Napier, but Bropez should've been brought back.

That was the biggest mistake this off season. It was crazy obvious that having a shooting big man items up so many more driving possibilities for LeBron, Ingram, Zo, Hart etc


With Shabazz, I just tossed out the first name that came to mind. But he's putting up 7 three-point attempts per 36 minutes and hitting them at 37%; 19 points per 36 minutes.

There were probably other players like Shabazz who would have sufficed for the cheap.
FGA Restricted All-Time Draft

In My Hood, The Bullies Get Bullied
PG: 2013 Mike Conley, 1998 Greg Anthony
SG: 2005 Manu Ginobili, 2015 Khris Middleton
SF: 1991 Scottie Pippen
PF: 1986 Larry Bird, 1996 Dennis Rodman
C: 1999 Alonzo Mourning
Revived
RealGM
Posts: 37,368
And1: 22,183
Joined: Feb 17, 2011

Re: Game 44: Cleveland Cavaliers (8-35) @ Los Angeles Lakers (23-20) 

Post#148 » by Revived » Tue Jan 15, 2019 2:10 pm

BasketballFan7 wrote:
Dr Aki wrote:
BasketballFan7 wrote:
Brook Lopez and Shabazz Napier were both league minimum signings, or right above it.


Don't know about Napier, but Bropez should've been brought back.

That was the biggest mistake this off season. It was crazy obvious that having a shooting big man items up so many more driving possibilities for LeBron, Ingram, Zo, Hart etc


With Shabazz, I just tossed out the first name that came to mind. But he's putting up 7 three-point attempts per 36 minutes and hitting them at 37%; 19 points per 36 minutes.

There were probably other players like Shabazz who would have sufficed for the cheap.

Wasn’t LeBron a huge Shabazz fan too or something? Surprising that he didn’t recruit him like he did with Rondo, McGee etc.
valrond1
Senior
Posts: 688
And1: 513
Joined: Aug 21, 2017
   

Re: Game 44: Cleveland Cavaliers (8-35) @ Los Angeles Lakers (23-20) 

Post#149 » by valrond1 » Tue Jan 15, 2019 4:00 pm

iamworthy wrote:
Slava wrote:
iamworthy wrote:
They'd probably want lonzo in return since they need a point guard.


I want a porterhouse steak for dinner everyday but I settle for salmon and salad.

I'd offer a protected 1st and if push comes to shove, one of Svi, Mo or Bonga.


I don't think 20/10 guys that shoot close to 40% from 3 come that cheap. I could be wrong though.


Well, we left a 20/10 guy go for free. He doesn't shoot 40% from 3. Anyway, unless your name is Stephen Curry or Kyle Korver, your 3 point shooting % varies from season to season.

Return to Los Angeles Lakers