kio80 wrote:Trade josh hart for fultz, problem solved for both teams
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
KCP for Fultz.
Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb
kio80 wrote:Trade josh hart for fultz, problem solved for both teams
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
IAMRANDYMARSH wrote:kio80 wrote:Trade josh hart for fultz, problem solved for both teams
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
KCP for Fultz.
Slava wrote:Would Utah deal Raul Neto for a 2nd?
kio80 wrote:Trade josh hart for fultz, problem solved for both teams
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Showtime:Part2 wrote:I really don’t get the rush if rondo is coming back soon. Bi and lance can cover for a game or two.
Slava wrote:kio80 wrote:Trade josh hart for fultz, problem solved for both teams
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah let's trade for a PG who cannot play or shoot when he does play and is on the hook for $10M next season. Terrific idea.
kio80 wrote:Slava wrote:kio80 wrote:Trade josh hart for fultz, problem solved for both teams
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah let's trade for a PG who cannot play or shoot when he does play and is on the hook for $10M next season. Terrific idea.
Fultz can play, but he won’t be able to shine in philly. He needs a new environment.
This kid can ball, and he will get his shot back.
Lonzo can’t shoot as well, or barely....
Think of fultz as a more athletic finisher than ball without the full court passes.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
kio80 wrote:Trade josh hart for fultz, problem solved for both teams
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
dAdo dA dEvil wrote:kio80 wrote:Slava wrote:
Yeah let's trade for a PG who cannot play or shoot when he does play and is on the hook for $10M next season. Terrific idea.
Fultz can play, but he won’t be able to shine in philly. He needs a new environment.
This kid can ball, and he will get his shot back.
Lonzo can’t shoot as well, or barely....
Think of fultz as a more athletic finisher than ball without the full court passes.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So that's why we aren't trading for Fultz. We already have shooting issues in this team. We don't need another guy who can't shoot. And I'm picking Lonzo's passing over Fultz athletic finishing. Hart can shoot and finish better than Fultz plus Hart is not injury prone like Fultz.
kio80 wrote:dAdo dA dEvil wrote:kio80 wrote:
Fultz can play, but he won’t be able to shine in philly. He needs a new environment.
This kid can ball, and he will get his shot back.
Lonzo can’t shoot as well, or barely....
Think of fultz as a more athletic finisher than ball without the full court passes.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So that's why we aren't trading for Fultz. We already have shooting issues in this team. We don't need another guy who can't shoot. And I'm picking Lonzo's passing over Fultz athletic finishing. Hart can shoot and finish better than Fultz plus Hart is not injury prone like Fultz.
It’s a gamble, Fultz has a much higher ceiling than Hart on paper.
Fultz was actually shooting well in college, and he finishes at the rim as well if not better than Hart.
He is also a better defender than Hart.
Hart struggles to stay in front of his man in many occasions, for some reason and sidesteps seems extremely clumsy.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
dAdo dA dEvil wrote:kio80 wrote:dAdo dA dEvil wrote:
So that's why we aren't trading for Fultz. We already have shooting issues in this team. We don't need another guy who can't shoot. And I'm picking Lonzo's passing over Fultz athletic finishing. Hart can shoot and finish better than Fultz plus Hart is not injury prone like Fultz.
It’s a gamble, Fultz has a much higher ceiling than Hart on paper.
Fultz was actually shooting well in college, and he finishes at the rim as well if not better than Hart.
He is also a better defender than Hart.
Hart struggles to stay in front of his man in many occasions, for some reason and sidesteps seems extremely clumsy.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
A gamble mostly for the Lakers so I'd say no. Right now Hart is playing better than Fultz. Hart is an awful perimeter defender and fouls a three point shooter at least once a game, but Hart is solid in defending bigs which is actually interesting given his height which is very undersized. You can see that Hart is at least trying and is a very good rebounder for his size. And the very fact that Hart is playing and Fultz is not and is very injury prone makes me say no to this trade.
kio80 wrote:dAdo dA dEvil wrote:kio80 wrote:
It’s a gamble, Fultz has a much higher ceiling than Hart on paper.
Fultz was actually shooting well in college, and he finishes at the rim as well if not better than Hart.
He is also a better defender than Hart.
Hart struggles to stay in front of his man in many occasions, for some reason and sidesteps seems extremely clumsy.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
A gamble mostly for the Lakers so I'd say no. Right now Hart is playing better than Fultz. Hart is an awful perimeter defender and fouls a three point shooter at least once a game, but Hart is solid in defending bigs which is actually interesting given his height which is very undersized. You can see that Hart is at least trying and is a very good rebounder for his size. And the very fact that Hart is playing and Fultz is not and is very injury prone makes me say no to this trade.
I didn’t say it’s not a gamble slightly against the Lakers, but the the topic is about Lakers needing a point guard, hence there are more urgency also for the Lakers.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
VCfor3 wrote:I don't know how you guys feel about Shelvin Mack, but he'd be cheap to acquire if the Grizzlies go through with the blow up.