Ball so hard wrote:tamaraw08 wrote:JVL wrote:[/u][/b]
.5 DWS at this point in the season puts you in the top 40 of the league. And place 20-40 are all at 0.5 DWS.
Some other names next to Green:
Jimmy Butler
Anunoby
Marc Gasol
Montrezl Harrell
Al Horford
Joe Ingles
Brook Lopez
KAT
Bradley and McGee also have 0.5 DWS btw. Danny is doing fine.
I'm not sure what you guys were expecting, but a guard who gives you >40% 3P shooting and above average defense is extremely rare. If we look at all guards in NBA history who scored at least 100 3 point shots at 40% or higher and had a DBPM of at least Danny his current 1.7 in a single season then we get:
Ginobili - 2008
Wesley Person - 1998
Kidd - 2009
Danny Green - 2015
Danny Green - 2014
That's it. Assuming he keeps up what he's doing right now his 2020 season will join that list. And those aren't really arbitrary stats either.
Unfortunately there are posters who love certain Lakers like KCP whose been ridiculed because of his horrible performances lately. So they have a tendency to being down other Lakers to insinuate that they’re also underperforming.
It would be nearly impossible to fine anyone on this entire board who loves KCP... try to find another strawman. Ridiculed for his horrible performance lately... really?? KCP has been regularly criticized the minute he signed what many perceive to be too large a contract. I've regularly defended KCP against irrational posters like yourself, who constantly screams KCP is terrible and we should trade him. I neither like nor dislike KCP. I've consistently mentioned that KCP defense is good, especially against PGs. Even in this atrocious season he's having, his defense is still solid; offensively he's terrible. I can walk and chew gum at the same time.
Hey, I'm not the one who decided to create ANOTHER ADVANCED defensive stats put them in a spreadsheet completely IGNORING advanced stats put up by nerds from ESPN (REAL defensive plus/minus), Cleaningtheglass.com and basketballreference's DBPM AND DRTG so you can convince posters here that KCP was the BEST player to cover opposing PGs. You started from all players, a noted weak defender like Kuzma to show, "see guys, my study is accurate, he too is weak from my research". Then boom, you showed KCP and btw Caruso being really good in defending PGs. Then Rondo also looked good, which was odd to you and some here including me. Then you STOPPED!!!!,
Why? no more research for Daniels, Cook and Green? You didn't like the results? Or mission accomplished, you already convinced a few here that KCP is the best PG defender?
Then you get REALLY annoyed with the Caruso hype, which is understandable to me even tho I like Alex. I then brought up your own results about him actually proving he is actually a very good defender but your counter is well, he didn't really cover a ton of PG starters?.
Now you suggest that Green is not living up to expectations revealing his defensive winshares? that it's only .5?, Sedalethreat and JVL were very confused and did their own research which contradicted yours, and now you jump to defensive winshares/48?
Just FYI, WINSHARES/48, KCP is ranked 14th with Zach Norvell as the worst.
But do you know what is the most IRONIC about this? Kilroy was right, at some point you have to throw away some of these advanced stats and use your eye test which I have been doing since day 1 of this season.
BELIEVE IT OR NOT, I am now convinced THAT KCP is NOT HORRIBLE DEFENDER,that he is actually a pretty good one chasing quick guards etc.